UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE14a-101)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.             )

Filed by the Registrant  ☑

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to§240.14a-12

The Timken Company

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

 

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

 

Fee paid previoulsy with preliminary materials.

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.0-11.


LOGO

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:


LOGO


LOGOLOGO    

John M. Timken, Jr.

Chairman – Board of Directors

 

The Timken Company

4500 Mt. Pleasant Street NW

North Canton, OH 44720

 

LOGO            LOGO

March 22, 201918, 2022

Dear Fellow Timken Shareholder:

The 2019Your Board of Directors is pleased to invite you to the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The Timken Company willto be held on Friday, May 10, 2019,6, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. local time attime. We will conduct this year’s meeting in an online-only format, with attendance via the corporate offices ofinternet, due to the company in North Canton, Ohio.ongoing pandemic.

This year, you are being asked to act upon fivefour matters. FourThree of these matters (Proposals Nos.1-4)No. 1-3) have been unanimously recommended by your Board of Directors. OneDirectors, while one of these matters (Proposal No. 5)4) is a shareholder proposal that is not supported by your Board of Directors. Details of these matters, along with the recommendations of your Board of Directors, are contained in the accompanying Notice of 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement.

Please read the enclosed information carefully before voting your shares. Voting your shares as soon as possible will ensure your representation at the meeting, whether or not you plan to attend.

I appreciate the strong participation andwant to thank you for your continuous support of our shareholdersbusiness over the years and I look forward to strong participation and a similar vote of support at the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Sincerely,

 

LOGOLOGO

John M. Timken, Jr.

Chairman – Board of Directors

Engineered Bearings   |I   Mechanical Power Transmission Products   |I   Industrial Services


THE TIMKEN COMPANY

North Canton, Ohio

 

 

NOTICE OF 20192022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

The 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The Timken Company will be held on Friday, May 10, 2019,6, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. local time, in an online-only format, with attendance via the internet at 4500 Mt. Pleasant Street NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720,the following web address: www.cesonlineservices.com/tkr22_vm. You will not be able to attend this meeting in person due to the ongoing pandemic.

The meeting is being held for the following purposes:

 

1.  Election of 1112 Directors to serve for a term of one year;

2.  Approval, on an advisory basis, of our named executive officer compensation;

3.  Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019;2022;

4.   Approval of The Timken Company 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan;

5.  Consideration of a shareholder proposal askingrequesting that our Board of Directorstake each step necessary so that each voting requirement in our charter and bylaws (that is explicit or implicit due to adoptdefault to state law) that calls for a policy, or otherwise take the steps necessary, to require that the Chairgreater than simple majority vote be eliminated, and replaced by a requirement for a majority of the Board of Directors be independent, if properly presented;votes cast for and against applicable proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws; and

6.5.  Consideration of such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Shareholders of record of common shares of The Timken Company at the close of business on February 20, 201922, 2022 are the shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTENDPARTICIPATE IN THE 2019ONLINE-ONLY 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS, PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED OR VOTE YOUR SHARES ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE. VOTING INSTRUCTIONS ARE PROVIDED ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.

Effect of Not Casting Your Vote. Under New York Stock Exchange rules, if you hold your shares in “street name” through a brokerage account, your broker will NOT be able to vote your shares for you on most of the matters being considered at the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, including the election of Directors, unless you have given instructions to your broker prior to the meeting.

In order to attend the online-only meeting, you will need to pre-register by 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on May 5, 2022. To pre-register for the meeting, please follow these instructions:

Registered Shareholders

If your shares are registered in your name with our transfer agent or you are a participant holding shares in a Timken-sponsored employee savings plan and you wish to attend the virtual meeting, go to www.cesonlineservices.com/tkr22_vm. Please have your Proxy Card or Notice of the Meeting, containing your 11-digit control number available and follow the instructions to complete your registration request.


Beneficial Shareholders (those holding shares through a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record)

Beneficial shareholders who wish to attend the virtual meeting may pre-register by visiting the website www.cesonlineservices.com/tkr22_vm. Please have available the voting instruction form, notice, or other communication from your broker, bank, or other holder of record that sets forth the control number provided to you and follow the instructions to complete your registration request.

After pre-registering for the meeting, shareholders will receive a confirmation email with a link and instructions for accessing the virtual Annual Meeting and submitting questions. Shareholders may review the rules of conduct for the virtual meeting or vote during the virtual Annual Meeting by following the instructions available on the meeting website.

Thank you for your continued support of The Timken Company.

Hansal N. Patel

Corporate Secretary

Hansal N. Patel
Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary

March 22, 201918, 2022

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 10, 2019:6, 2022: This Proxy Statement and our 20182021 Annual Report to Shareholders are available on the Investors section of our websitehttp:https://investors.timken.cominvestors.timken.com/. For directions to the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, you may call234-262-3000.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 


PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights certain information contained in the Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement before voting.

20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

 

Date and Time: Friday, May 10, 2019,6, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. local time
Location: The Timken Company, 4500 Mt. Pleasant Street NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720Online-only format, with attendance via the internet at the following web address: www.cesonlineservices.com/tkr22_vm
Record Date: February 20, 201922, 2022
Mail Date: The approximate date our Proxy Statement and proxy card will be first sent or given to our shareholders is March 22, 2019.18, 2022.

Voting Matters and Board Voting Recommendations

 

 

Board

  Recommends  

Proposal 

BoardSee

Recommendation

Page

Reference

For

1.  Election of 1112 Directors to serve for a term of one year.

 

FOR

8

11
For

2.  Approval, on an advisory basis, of our named executive officer compensation.

 

FOR

26

33
For

3.  Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019.

FOR

61

4.  Approval of The Timken Company 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan.

FOR

63

5.  A shareholder proposal asking our Board of Directors to adopt a policy, or otherwise take the steps necessary, to require that the Chair of the Board of Directors be independent, if properly presented.

×

AGAINST2022.

 74
Against

4.  A shareholder proposal requesting that our Board take each step necessary so that each voting requirement in our charter and bylaws (that is explicit or implicit due to default to state law) that calls for a greater than simple majority vote be eliminated, and replaced by a requirement for a majority of the votes cast for and against applicable proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws.

76

 

LOGOLOGO

Director Nominees

 

See Proposal No. 1 on page 811 of the Proxy Statement for more details on the 1112 nominees for Director. The following information describes relevant information about each nominee as of March 1, 2019.2022.

 

           

 

Committee Memberships

 

Name and Title  Age  Director
since
  Independent Audit Compensation 

Nominating &
Corporate
Governance

 

  

Other      

Public      

Boards      

 

  Maria A. Crowe

 

Retired President of Manufacturing Operations, Eli Lilly and Company

  59  2014      *  

  Elizabeth A. Harrell

 

Retired Major General, U.S. Air Force

  65  2017       

  Richard G. Kyle

 

President and Chief Executive Officer, The Timken Company

  53  2013       1

  John A. Luke, Jr.

 

Chairman, WestRock Company

  70  1999     *   1

  Christopher L. Mapes

 

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.

  57  2014       1

  James F. Palmer

 

Retired Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Northrop Grumman Corporation

  69  2015    *    

  Ajita G. Rajendra

 

Executive Chairman, A. O. Smith Corporation

  67  2014       2

  Frank C. Sullivan

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, RPM International Inc.

  58  2003       1

  John M. Timken, Jr.

 

Chairman, Board of Directors, The Timken Company

  67  1986   **     

  Ward J. Timken, Jr.

 

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, TimkenSteel Corporation

  51  2002       1

  Jacqueline F. Woods

 

Retired President, AT&T Ohio

  71  2000        1
        

 

Committee Memberships

 

Name and Title     Age     

    Director    

since

     Independent         Audit         Compensation     

 

    Nominating &    

Corporate

Governance

 

 

Other

Public

    Boards    

Maria A. Crowe

 

Retired President of Manufacturing

Operations, Eli Lilly and Company

 62 2014   ��

Chair

 

Elizabeth A. Harrell

 

Retired Major General, U.S. Air

Force

 68 2017     

Richard G. Kyle

 

President and Chief Executive

Officer, The Timken Company

 56 2013     1

Sarah C. Lauber

 

Chief Financial Officer & Secretary,

Douglas Dynamics, Inc.

 50 2021     

John A. Luke, Jr.

 

Retired Chairman, WestRock

Company; Retired President and

CEO MeadWestvaco Corporation

 73 1999     

Christopher L. Mapes

 

Chairman, President and Chief

Executive Officer, Lincoln Electric

Holdings, Inc.

 60 2014     1

James F. Palmer

 

Retired Corporate Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer,

Northrop Grumman Corporation

 72 2015  

Chair

   

Ajita G. Rajendra

 

Retired Executive Chairman,

President and CEO

A. O. Smith Corporation

 70 2014   

Chair

  2

Frank C. Sullivan

 

Chairman and Chief Executive

Officer, RPM International Inc.

 61 2003     1

John M. Timken, Jr.

 

Chairman, Board of Directors, The

Timken Company

 70 1986 

Independent
Chairman

    

Ward J. Timken, Jr.

 

Chief Executive Officer, McKinley

Strategies, LLC

 54 2002     

Jacqueline F. Woods

 

Retired President, AT&T Ohio

 74 2000     
        

Average Age / Median Tenure

 64 8.5 years          

 * Denotes committee chair

Board Composition Overview

 ** Denotes Independent Chairman

Gender and Ethnic Diversity

OversightIndependenceRefreshment
    LOGO

LOGO

Three Audit

Committee

Financial Experts

LOGO

Over

Half

of our Board

refreshed within

the last decade

Representative Skills and Attributes of the Board

LOGO

LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE

Senior leadership experience at a large organization, including current or former service as a public company officer (CEO, CFO, etc.) or military general, or other public company board service leading to valuable insight on corporate governance matters

LOGO

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

Expertise in talent management, public company compensation structures, key employee development and retention, and executive succession planning

LOGO

FINANCIAL REPORTING AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION

Experience in the finance function of an enterprise, including an in-depth understanding of financial management, financial reporting and capital allocation processes

LOGO

MANUFACTURING AND ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT

Expertise in manufacturing operations and logistics and environmental management to drive operating performance through sustainable means

LOGO

LOGO

RISK MANAGEMENT

Experience with risk management and compliance oversight relevant to the exercise of fiduciary responsibilities

        LOGO

STRATEGY AND M&A

Responsibility for driving growth through innovative strategic initiatives and through acquisitions and other business combinations

LOGO

GOVERNMENTAL AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

Insight into managing governmental and regulatory affairs relevant to the Company’s business operations

        LOGO

MARKETING AND SALES

Expertise in marketing, sales, and customer service at a scale relevant to the Company’s global business

LOGO

GLOBAL OPERATIONS

Service in a leadership role with multinational companies or in global markets, leading to a deep knowledge of global industry dynamics and international supply chain management

Corporate Governance Highlights

    

 

The Timken Company is committed to strong corporate governance as evidenced by the following practices. See page 2125 of the Proxy Statement for more details.

 

Board

Independence

  

   910 of 1112 Director nominees are independent

 

Independent ChairmanChair of the Board

Director Elections  

   Commitment to Board refreshment and diversity – 57 new independent Directors (representing over half of our Board) added since 2014in the past decade

 

   All standing committee members are independent

 

   Declassified Board with annual Board elections

 

   Directors are elected by a majority of votes cast, and our Majority Voting Policy requires any Director who fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in favor of his or her election to submit his or her resignation to the Board

Board Practices  

   ShareStock ownership requirements for nonemployee Directors (5x cash retainer)

 

   At each Board meeting, the independent Directors have the opportunity to conduct executive sessions

 

   Annual Board, committee and Director evaluations

 

   Over-boarding policy limits the number of public company boards a Director can serve on

Shareholder

Rights

  

   Shareholder proxy access with 3/3/20/20 parameters

 

   Special meetings may be called by shareholders holding 25% of the Company’s common shares

Other Best

Practices

  

   Annual advisory vote on our named executive officer compensation

 

   5 of 12 Directors are ethnically or gender diverse

   Code of Conduct for Directors, officers and employees

   Strong focus on shareholder engagement – over 400 interactions with investors in 2021

   3 Audit Committee financial experts

   Audit Committee or Board receives reports on cyber security threats and trends at least annually and receives regular updates on our information security program

   Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee provides oversight for Corporate Social Responsibility (“CSR”) program

2018Corporate Social Responsibility    

In 2021, CSR remained a priority for Timken as we published our most recent CSR report. In consideration of our efforts, we were named one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies® by Ethisphere® Institute for the eleventh time, among America’s Most Responsible Companies by Newsweek and Statista and one of America’s Best Employers, America’s Best Employers for New Graduates and America’s Best Employers for Women by Forbes.

For more information regarding our corporate social responsibility program, please see page 25 of the Proxy Statement or our most recent corporate social responsibility report available on our website at https://www.timken.com/corporate-social-responsibility/.

LOGO

Additional awards in 2021:

One of the World’s Most Ethical Companies® by Ethisphere® Institute for the eleventh time

One of America’s Best Employers by Forbes

One of America’s Best Employers for New Graduates by Forbes

One of America’s Best Employers for Women by Forbes

2021 Performance Highlights

 

2018 wasTimken delivered record-setting performance in 2021, despite the unprecedented supply chain challenges and inflationary pressures that accelerated during the year. The Company grew revenue and earnings significantly in 2021, with record revenue of $4.13 billion, an outstanding year for Timken on a numberincrease of fronts, with strong operating and financial performance both year-over-year and as compared against industrial peers. We profitably grew the Company in 2018, increasing revenue approximately 19% to $3.58 billion,18% from 2020, net income increasing approximately 49%30% to $302.8$369 million and adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and taxesamortization (“EBIT”EBITDA”) byincreasing approximately 52%9% to $500.5$718 million1 million.. We achieved strongrecord earnings per diluted share (“EPS”) of $3.86$4.79 and record adjusted EPS of $4.18$4.721, up approximately 50%29% and 59%15%, respectively, from the prior year. The2020. We also delivered an adjusted EPS for 2018 was 37% higher than any previous year in the Company’s history. In addition, we generated return on invested capital (“ROIC”) of 12.8%11.0%1 in 2018, an improvement2021, up from 9.9% last year. In addition, we generated net cash from operations of 230 basis points from$387 million and free cash flow of $2391 million in 2021.

We achieved these results through the prior year. continued execution of our corporate strategy, which is delivering improved performance and higher returns through the business cycle. Our strategy focuses on (1) driving organic growth and share gains in our core business by leading in product technology, innovation and service, (2) executing operational excellence initiatives across the enterprise to enhance performance, and (3) deploying capital to drive optimal returns for our investors.

We have continued to create significant shareholder value by delivering total shareholder returnreturns (“TSR”) of 12.2%25.5%, 1.5%14.3%, and 12.8%12.1% over the past three-, five-, andten-year periods, respectively. Our three-year and five-year TSR which reflectsoutpaced the executionmedian of our new strategy following2021 compensation peer group and also exceeded the Spinoff (as defined below), outpaced bothS&P 500 Industrials over these respective timeframes, while our compensation peersten-year TSR was just slightly below our peer median and the S&P 500 index, while our five-year TSR outpaced our compensation peers,Industrials. The S&P 500 Industrials comprises those companies included in each case over the same respective timeframes. Ourten-year TSR, which reflects the alignment of our strategy with long-term shareholder value creation, was slightly below both the S&P 500 index that are classified as members of the Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) industrials sector.

In 2021, we deployed capital in a disciplined and balanced manner to strengthen our compensation peers over the same timeframe. Additionally, we increasedcompetitive position, create value for our shareholders and further enhance our financial position. We allocated $148 million, or about 3.6% of our sales, to capital expenditures focused on growth and continuous improvement initiatives. We also paid out our 386th398th consecutive quarterly dividend, continuing one of the longest activecontinuous dividend streaks on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and increased our quarterly dividend to $0.30/share in the second quarter, making 20182021 the fiftheighth consecutive year of higher annual dividend increases.

We achieved these results through the disciplined executiondividends. In addition, we repurchased approximately 1.25 million shares of stock, or over 1.7% of our strategy,outstanding shares.

2021 also marked the release of our third annual CSR report, which is focuseddetailed our vision to build a more efficient and resilient world. The report highlights how we continue to advance our corporate social responsibility initiatives by promoting a culture of problem solvers with a strong focus on driving organic growth in our core business by leading in product technology, innovation and service; improving our business performance and expanding margins through operational excellence initiatives; and deploying our cash flow and capital to drive strong returns for our investors.

In 2018, we strengthened our global leadership position in tapered roller bearings and grew our offering in industrial bearings. We also allocated approximately $8312 million towards three acquisitions that significantly expanded our power transmission portfolio and geographic reach (Cone Drive - a leader in precision drives, Rollon - a leader in engineered linear motionsustainable products and ABC Bearings - which strengthened our position inpractices across the growing India bearing market).Company, while maintaining a strong commitment to ethics.

See page 2835 of the Proxy Statement for more details on the Company’s 20182021 performance.

 

 

1 SeeAppendix A for reconciliations of adjusted EBIT,EPS, adjusted EPS,EBITDA, free cash flow, and adjusted ROIC to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. Free cash flow is defined as net cash from operations minus capital expenditures. Adjusted ROIC is calculateddefined as adjusted net operating profit after taxes (“ANOPAT”) divided by average invested capital. TheseThe performance metrics discussed above are used for external reporting and may not correlate exactly to their corresponding compensation adjusted metrics due to slightly different adjustmentsslight differences in methodology (see pages 40, 42 and 4348 to 52 for more details on how the compensation adjusted metrics are calculated).

2 ABC Bearings was acquired using shares of the Company’s majority-owned subsidiary, Timken India Limited, and the target value of those shares is included in the $831 million.

Return to Shareholders

 

 

LOGOLOGO

*Total Shareholder ReturnTSR for the Company was calculated on an annualized basis and assumes quarterly reinvestment of dividends anddividends. The 10-year period takes into account the value of TimkenSteel Corporation (“TimkenSteel”) common shares distributed in the spinoff of TimkenSteel from the Company, thatwhich was completed on June 30, 2014 (the “Spinoff”).

**See page 3543 of the Proxy Statement for the companies that are included in the compensation peer group for 2018.2021.

2018***The S&P 500 Industrials comprises those companies included in the S&P 500 index that are classified as members of the GICS industrials sector.

2021 Executive Compensation Practices

 

We design our executive compensation plans and program to help us attract, motivate, reward and retain highly qualified executives who are capable of creating and sustaining value for our shareholders over the long term. See page 2735 of the Proxy Statement for more details.

 

Objectives  Philosophy
Objectives

Our executive compensation program is designed to:

 

   Align the interests of our executives and shareholders

 

   Reward for sustained, strong business results

 

   Incentivize profitable growth and capital deployment discipline

   Attract, retain and motivate the best talent

Philosophy  

Our executive compensation philosophy is built on the following principles:

 

   Recognizing that people are our most important assetresource

 

   Rewarding results linked to both short- and long-term performance(pay-for-performance)

 

   Positioning our pay to be competitive in the marketplace

 

   Focusing on increasing shareholder value

 

What We Do  What We Do Not Do

  Share

We utilize stock ownership requirements for executives (5x base salary for CEO and 3x2x-3x for the other named executive officers)

X  

 

×   We do not allow hedging or pledging of our shares

re-price outstanding stock options

  “Clawback” policy permits clawback

We have “clawback” provisions that permit the recovery of executive compensation if an executive engages in conduct that is detrimental to the Company

and results in restatement of financial results

  

×   X  

We do not provide excise taxgross-ups on perquisites or inunder named executive officer severance agreements

  Shareholder-approved

We use shareholder-approved plans to provide short-term and long-term incentive plans

incentives

  

×   We do notre-price stock options and do not issue discounted stock options

  Use of targeted performance metrics to align pay with performance

X  

 

×   We do not provide excessive perquisites

allow hedging or pledging of our shares

  Different

We use different metrics are used for short-term and long-term incentive plans that are designed to align pay with performance

X  

We do not have single-trigger vesting

✓   

 

×   We provide very limited perquisites

X  

We do not have employment agreements for our named executive officers

 

×   We do not have single-trigger vesting

Pay-for-Performance

 

Our compensation program is designed to link pay and performance, which we believe has been demonstrated by the strong level of shareholder support we have received for our named executive officer compensation program through our annual “say-on-pay” vote over the last few years.years (as depicted below). A significant portion of the compensation of our named executive officers is equity based, which we believe aligns our executives’ interests with the interests of our shareholders.

 

 

 

Shareholder Support of Named Executive Officer Compensation

 

 2018  97%
 2017  97%
 2016  96%

LOGO

The Company’s incentive compensation program for executives is designed to link compensation with key financial and operational goals, some of which are short term,short-term, while others take several years or more to achieve. The Company uses a balance of short-term and long-term incentives, as well as cash andnon-cash compensation, to meet these objectives:

 

LOGO

LOGO

Our incentive compensation program payouts for plan yearsperformance periods ending in 2018 were aligned with performance:2021 reflect good performance relative to a challenging cost and supply situation:

 

  

There was a 175.5%74.4% payout under the annual cash incentive plan, reflecting strongwhich reflected below-target performance for 2018;2021, due primarily to lower than targeted free cash flow (driven mainly by higher working capital) and slightly lower earnings and operating margins as compared to target (driven mainly by higher operating costs to serve customers); and

  

There was a 114%92.7% payout for 2016-20182019-2021 performance-based restricted stock units, which reflects improvedreflected strong overall performance in a challenging environment, as the targets were set in early 2019, prior to the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. We achieved record adjusted EPS results in 2019 and 2021, and strong average adjusted ROIC performance over the cycle, particularly in 2017 and 2018.period.

2018 Annual Cash Incentive Plan Payout 2016-2018 Performance-Based

Despite the significant unforeseen impact of COVID-19, no adjustments or modifications were made to the financial performance metrics or targets for our 2019-2021 performance-based RSU Cyclecycle, which in part led to the below-target payout.

LOGO

LOGO

See pages 3847 to 4452 of the Proxy Statement for more details on the 2021 annual cash incentive plan and the 2016-20182019-2021 performance-based restricted stock units.

THE TIMKEN COMPANY

PROXY STATEMENT

The enclosed proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors (also referred to as the “Board”) of The Timken Company, an Ohio corporation (the “Company,” “Timken,” “we,” or “us”), in connection with the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Friday, May 10, 2019,6, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. local time at 4500 Mt. Pleasant Street NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720,in an online-only format, with attendance via the internet, and at any adjournments and postponements thereof, for the purpose of considering and acting upon the matters specified in the foregoing Notice.

The approximate date this Proxy Statement and proxy card will be first sent or given to our shareholders is March 22, 2019.18, 2022.

Instructions for attending the online-only meeting are available in the accompanying Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and under the section titled “Participation at the Annual Meeting” on page 79.

The Board of Directors is not aware of matters other than those specified in the foregoing Notice that will be brought before the meeting for action. However, if any such matters should be properly brought before the meeting, the persons appointed as proxies may vote or act upon such matters according to their judgment.

PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

We currently have 12 Directors. Pursuant to our Amended Regulations, all nominees for Director will stand for election for aone-year term to expire at the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Candidates for Director receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected. Abstentions and “brokernon-votes” (where a broker, other record holder, or nominee indicates on a proxy card that it does not have authority to vote certain shares on a particular matter) will not be counted in the election of Directors and will not have any effect on the result of the vote.

Pursuant to the Majority Voting Policy of the Board of Directors, any Director who fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in his or her election will submit his or her resignation to the Board of Directors promptly after the certification of the election results. The Board of Directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will then consider the resignation in light of any factors they consider appropriate, including the Director’s qualifications and service record, as well as any reasons given by shareholders as to why they withheld votes from the Director. The Board of Directors is required to determine whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation within 90 days following the election and to disclose on a Current Report on Form8-K its decision, as well as the reasons for rejecting any tendered resignation, if applicable.

Joseph W. Ralston, a Director of the Company since 2003 and our independent Lead Director since 2011, is retiring from the Board effective as of the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In connection with Mr. Ralston’s retirement, at its meeting on February 6, 2019, the Board approved a resolution decreasing the size of the Board from 12 to 11 Directors effective as of the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We thank Mr. Ralston for his significant contributions to the Company during his service on the Board.

At its meeting on February 6, 2019,11, 2022, the Board also approved a resolution, based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, nominating the 1112 individuals set forth below to be elected Directors at the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to serve for a term of one year expiring at the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (or until their respective successors are elected and qualified). Each of the nominees previously was elected as a Director by our shareholders. Each of the nominees listed belowshareholders and each has consented to serve as a Director if elected.

If any nominee becomes unable, for any reason, to serve as a Director, or should a vacancy occur before the election (which events are not anticipated), the Directors then in office may substitute another person as a nominee or may reduce the number of nominees as they deem advisable. Unless otherwise

indicated on any proxy card, the persons named as proxies on the enclosed proxy card intend to vote the shares covered by such proxy card in favor of the nominees below.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES BELOW.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES BELOW.

Nominees

 

The following information, obtained in part from the respective nominee and in part from our records, describes the background and select experience of each nominee as of March 1, 2019:2022:

 

 

LOGO

Maria A. Crowe

Age: 59

Director since 2014LOGO

 

  

 

Business Experience

 

Ms. Crowe served as President of Manufacturing Operations for Eli Lilly and Company, a global manufacturer of pharmaceutical products, a position she held from 2012 until her retirement in December 2017. Ms. Crowe joined Eli Lilly and Company in 1982, and previously served as its Senior Vice President of Global Drug Products from 2009 to 2012.

 

Qualifications

 

Ms. Crowe provides the Board with extensive experience in manufacturing, sourcing and procurement for a global manufacturing company. Ms. Crowe also brings valuable experience on production capacity expansion and innovation efforts.

 

Ms.Maria A. Crowe chairs our

Age: 62

Director since 2014

Committees:

· Compensation

· Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and is a member of our Audit Committee.(Chair)

 

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Elizabeth A. Harrell

Age: 65

Director since 2017

  

 

Business Experience

 

GeneralMs. Harrell retired as a Major General in October 2006, serving more than 30 years with the U.S. Air Force. During her military career, she held a wide range of positions in the United States, Germany and South Korea, specializing in aircraft fleet maintenance and sustainment. After her retirement from the U.S. Air Force, GeneralMs. Harrell was a consultant with The Spectrum Group until 2009 and a consultant to Northrop Grumman Corporation, a global security company and a provider of products, systems and solutions in the fields of aerospace, electronics, information systems, and technical services, until 2012.

 

Qualifications

 

GeneralMs. Harrell’s extensive knowledge of aerospace technology, global supply chain management and government relations strongly align with the Company’s growth priorities and are valuable to her service as a member of the Board.

 

GeneralElizabeth A. Harrell is a member of our

Age: 68

Director since 2017

Committees:

· Compensation Committee and

· Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Richard G. Kyle

Age: 5356

Director since 2013

  

 

Business Experience

 

Mr. Kyle was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of The Timken Company in 2014. Mr. Kyle joined the Company in 2006 as Vice Presidentand has served in multiple leadership roles of Manufacturing and was named President ofincreasing responsibility during his tenure with the Aerospace and Mobile Industries segments in 2008. In 2012, he was named Group President with responsibility for the Aerospace and Steel segments as well as engineering and technology. In 2013, Mr. Kyle was named Chief Operating Officer, Bearings and Power Transmission.Company.

 

Since 2015, Mr. Kyle has served as a director of Sonoco Products Company, a global provider of consumer packaging, industrial products, protective solutions, and display and packaging services, and as a member of its Audit, Executive Compensation and Financial PolicyGovernance and Nominating Committees.

 

Qualifications

 

Mr. Kyle has significant experience inwith global manufacturing organizations and has demonstrated the ability to lead change and growth. In addition to his role as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Kyle’s strong engineering and operational background, coupled with his strategic perspective, provide valued skills to the Board.

 

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Business Experience

Ms. Lauber is Chief Financial Officer & Secretary of Douglas Dynamics, Inc., a premier manufacturer and upfitter of work truck attachments and equipment, a position she has held since August 2017. Prior to joining Douglas Dynamics, Inc., she served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Jason Industries Inc., a diversified industrial company, from 2015 to 2017. Ms. Lauber has over 25 years of professional experience in various finance and strategic functions and began her career as an accountant at KPMG.

Qualifications

Ms. Lauber’s expertise leading the finance and accounting function of multiple publicly traded manufacturing companies and her experience with financial planning and acquisition integration makes her well-suited to serve on our Board.

Sarah C. Lauber

Age: 50

Director since 2021

 

John A. Luke, Jr.Committees:

Age: 70· Audit

Director since 1999· Compensation

LOGO

  

 

Business Experience

 

Mr. Luke served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MeadWestvaco Corporation (“MWV”), a leading global producer of packaging and specialty chemicals, from the merger of Mead and Westvaco in 2002 until his retirement in 2015. Prior to his retirement, Mr. Luke led the process that resulted in MWV merging with Rock-Tenn Company to formserved as a director of WestRock Company which created the second largest packaging company in the industry.from 2015 until 2022 when he retired as its Non-Executive Chairman. Mr. Luke haspreviously served as a director of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation from 2007 to 2018 and Dominion Midstream GP, LLC from 2017 to 2018, MWV from 2002 to 2015, and WestRock Company since 2015.2018.

 

Qualifications

 

Mr. Luke brings deep executive leadership experience to our Board, including expertise in leading large corporate transformations and evaluating and executing inorganic growth opportunities. Mr. Luke brings perspective gained from serving on several corporate boards, including asboards.

Non-ExecutiveJohn A. Luke, Jr. Chairman of WestRock Company and Chair of the Conflicts Committee of Dominion Midstream GP, LLC.

Age: 73

Director since 1999

 

Mr. Luke chairs ourCommittees:

· Compensation Committee and is a member of our

· Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

 

LOGO

Christopher L. Mapes

Age: 57

Director since 2014LOGO

 

  

 

Business Experience

 

Mr. Mapes is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc., a global manufacturer of welding, cutting and joining products. He has held the position of Chairman since December 2013 and has been President and Chief Executive Officer since December 2012, after serving as Chief Operating Officer beginning in 2011. From 2004 to 2011, he served as Executive Vice President of A. O. Smith Corporation, a global water technology company and manufacturer of residential and commercial water heating and water purification equipment, where he led the expansion and execution of the global strategy for its electrical products business. Mr. Mapes has been a director of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. since 2010.

 

Qualifications

 

As a seasoned executive with extensive experience leading global manufacturing and distribution companies, Mr. Mapes understands the challenges of global growth and the complexity of managing international operations. In addition to his business management experience, Mr. Mapes has a law degree.

 

Mr.Christopher L. Mapes is a member of our Audit Committee and Compensation Committee.

Age: 60

Director since 2014

 

Committees:

· Audit

· Nominating and Corporate Governance

 

LOGO

James F. Palmer

Age: 69

Director since 2015LOGO

 

  

 

Business Experience

 

Mr. Palmer served as the Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Northrop Grumman Corporation, a global security company and a provider of products, systems and solutions in the fields of aerospace, electronics, information systems and technical services, from March 2007 until February 2015 and as a Corporate Vice President of Northrop Grumman until his retirement in July 2015.

 

Qualifications

 

Mr. Palmer’s broad executive background in the aerospace and defense industry, his service as the chief financial officer of multiple large publicly traded companies, and his extensive experience with business acquisitions, debt financings and other complex transactions make him well-qualifiedwell qualified to serve as a member of the Board.

 

Mr.James F. Palmer chairs our Audit Committee and is a member of our Compensation Committee.

Age: 72

Director since 2015

 

Committees:

· Audit (Chair)

· Compensation

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Ajita G. Rajendra

Age: 67

Director since 2014

  

 

Business Experience

 

Mr. Rajendra isserved as Executive Chairman of A. O. Smith Corporation, a global water technology company and manufacturer of residential and commercial water heating and water purification equipment.equipment, from September 2018 until his retirement on May 1, 2020. He hashad held the position of Chairman since 2014 and was President and Chief Executive Officer from 2013 until 2018. Mr. Rajendra previously served A. O. Smith Corporation as President and Chief Operating Officer from 2011 to 2012 and as Executive Vice President from 2006 to 2011.

 

Qualifications

 

Mr. Rajendra has been a director of A. O. Smith Corporation since 2011 and serves on its Investment Policy Committee, and has been a director of Donaldson Company, Inc. since 2010, where he is a member of the AuditCorporate Governance Committee and Human Resources Committee. Mr. Rajendra’s extensive manufacturing and international experience leading businesses and negotiating acquisitions and joint ventures, along with his experience as a director of other publicly traded companies, provides valuable skills to the Board.

 

Mr.Ajita G. Rajendra is a member of our Audit Committee and Compensation Committee.

Age: 70

Director since 2014

 

Committees:

· Audit

· Compensation (Chair)

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Frank C. Sullivan

Age: 58

Director since 2003

  

 

Business Experience

 

Mr. Sullivan has held the position of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of RPM International Inc. (“RPM”), a world leader in specialty coatings, since 2008. Mr. Sullivan was appointed RPM’s Chief Executive Officer in 2002, prior to which he held the position of Chief Financial Officer since 1993. Mr. Sullivan has been a director of RPM since 1995 and serves onchairs RPM’s Executive and Operating Improvement Committees.Committee.

 

Qualifications

 

Mr. Sullivan provides the Board with extensive financial expertise based on his years as a chief financial officer. In addition, as a chief executive officer and director of a multinational company, Mr. Sullivan brings invaluable executive experience on a wide array of issues, including strategic planning and the evaluation and execution of merger and acquisition opportunities.

 

Mr.Frank C. Sullivan is a member of our

Age: 61

Director since 2003

Committees:

· Audit Committee and

· Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

 

LOGO

John M. Timken, Jr.

Age: 67

Director since 1986LOGO

 

  

 

Business Experience

 

Mr. Timken is a private investor and a successful entrepreneur, who has been a significant shareholder of the Company for many years. Mr. Timken isco-founder of Amgraph Packaging, a national supplier of flexible package printing used by major food and beverage brands and private labels. His entrepreneurial activities and passion for business-building have included involvement in ventures ranging from injection molding, to ophthalmic laboratories, to logistics and trucking. He also has owned a cable television business and established one of the largest commercial mushroom farms in North America.

 

Qualifications

 

Mr. Timken’s ability as an investor to identify and help increase value across a range of industries, as well as his familiarity with the Company’s businesses, provides the Board with critical input in evaluating and making capital allocation decisions. Since joining the Board, he has played an important role in the Company’s strategic drive to add product lines that complement its bearing product portfolio.

 

Mr.John M. Timken, serves as independentJr.

Age: 70

Director since 1986

Independent Chairman of the Board.

Board

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Ward J. Timken, Jr.

Age: 5154

Director since 2002

  

 

Business Experience

 

Mr. Timken isco-founded McKinley Strategies, LLC, a political consulting firm, and has served as its Chief Executive Officer since January 2020. Prior to that, Mr. Timken served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of TimkenSteel, a leader in customized alloy steel products and services, a position he assumed in 2014.from 2014 to 2019. TimkenSteel was previously a subsidiary of the Company that became an independent public company pursuant to the Spinoff that was effected on June 30,a spinoff in 2014. Mr. Timken previously served as Executive Chairman of the Board of The Timken Company from 2005 to May 2014.

 

Qualifications

 

Mr. Timken provides the Board with relevant experience from having served in key leadership positions during his tenure with the Company. Mr. Timken’s broad-based experience and familiarity with each of our businesses, along with his deep understanding of the global industry dynamics across the Company’s markets, enable Mr. Timken to provide valuable input to the Board.

 

  

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Jacqueline F. Woods

Age: 7174

Director since 2000

Committees:

· Compensation

· Nominating and Corporate Governance

  

Business Experience

 

Ms. Woods served as the President of Ameritech Ohio (subsequently renamed AT&T Ohio), a telecommunications company, until her retirement in 2000. At Ameritech Ohio, Ms. Woods also held various positions in finance, operations, marketing, sales and government affairs. Ms. Woods was inducted into the Ohio Women’s Hall of Fame in 1998. Ms. Woods has served on the board of The Andersons, Inc. since 1999.from 1999 to 2020.

 

Qualifications

 

Ms. Woods’ extensive executive management experience enables her to help guide the Board in making decisions in areas such as marketing, strategy development, corporate governance and compensation. In addition, her executive experience at a primarily consumer-oriented company provides a valuable perspective on customer service. Ms. Woods also brings perspective gained from her service as a member of other corporate boards, including serving as a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees and as Chair of the Leadership Development Committee of The Andersons, Inc.

Ms. Woods is a member of our Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.public company boards.

 

Independence Determinations

 

The Board of Directors has adopted the NYSE independence standards for determining the independence of our Directors. The Board has also adopted standards for categorically immaterial relationships to assist the Board in determining the independence of each Director. These standards include, but are not limited to:

 

  

if the Director is, or has an immediate family member who is, a partner, principal or member (or any comparable position) of, an executive officer or employee of, or a director of, any organization to which Timken made, or from which Timken received, immaterial payments for property or services in the current or any of the past three fiscal years;

 

  

if the Director, or an immediate family member of the Director, serves as an officer, director or trustee of a foundation, university, charitable or othernot-for-profit organization, and Timken’s discretionary charitable contributions to the organization are immaterial, in the aggregate; or

 

  

if the Director serves on the board of directors of another company at which another Timken Director or executive officer also serves as a director.

A complete list and description of the categorically immaterial relationships is set forth in Appendix B to the Board of Directors General Policies and Procedures, which is available on the Corporate Governance Section of our website atwww.timken.com/about/governance-documentshttps://investors.timken.com/corporate-governance/documents/.

The Board has determined that the following Director nominees meet these independence standards: Maria A. Crowe, Elizabeth A. Harrell, John A. Luke, Jr., Christopher L. Mapes, James F. Palmer, Ajita G. Rajendra, Frank C. Sullivan, John M. Timken, Jr., and Jacqueline F. Woods. With respect to John M. Timken, Jr., the Board determined that his family relationship to Ward J. Timken, Jr. does not impair his independence. Joseph W. Ralston, who will serve as a Director of the Company until the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, also has been determined to meet the Board’s independence standards. 

The Board has determined that the following Director nominees meet these independence standards: Maria A. Crowe, Elizabeth A. Harrell, Sarah C. Lauber, John A. Luke, Jr., Christopher L. Mapes, James F. Palmer, Ajita G. Rajendra, Frank C. Sullivan, John M. Timken, Jr., and Jacqueline F. Woods. With respect to John M. Timken, Jr., the Board determined that his family relationship to Ward J. Timken, Jr. does not impair his independence.

10/12

members of our Board are independent

Related Party Transactions Approval Policy

 

Our Directors and executive officers are subject to our Standards of Business Ethics, which require that any potential conflicts of interest involving our Directors or executive officers, such as significant transactions with related parties, be reported to our ethics and compliance office atethics@timken.com.Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary. Our Directors and executive officers also are subject to the Timken Policy Against Conflicts of Interest, which requires that an employee or Director avoid placing himself or herself in a position in which his or her personal interests could interfere, in any wayor appear to interfere, with our interests. While not every situation can be identified in a written policy, the Timken Policy Against Conflicts of Interest does specifically prohibitidentifies the following situations:situations as examples that may constitute a prohibited conflict of interest:

 

  

competing against the Company;

  

holding a significant financial interest in a company doing business with or competing with the Company;

  

accepting gifts, gratuities or entertainment from any customer, competitor or supplier of goods or services to the Company, except to the extent they are customary and reasonable in amount and not in consideration for an improper action by the recipient;

  

using for personal gain any business opportunities that are identified through a person’s position with the Company;

  

using the Company’s property, information or position for personal gain;

  

using the Company’s property other than in connection with our business;

  

maintaining other employment or a business that adversely affects a person’s job performance at the Company; and

  

doing business on the Company’s behalf with a relative or another company employing or owned by a relative.

In the event of any potential conflict of interest, pursuant to the charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Standards of Business Ethics and the Timken Policy Against Conflicts of Interest, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee would review, determine whether or not a conflict of interest exists and, if appropriate after considering such factors as it deems appropriate under the circumstances, make a determination as to whether to grant a waiver or specify any mitigation actions to address the policies for any such situation. Any waiver wouldpotential conflict. Waivers involving our Directors or executive officers will be promptly disclosed to shareholders.shareholders in a manner consistent with applicable laws or regulations and in accordance with our applicable policies. Additionally, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee would review and approve or ratify any transaction required to be publicly reported to shareholders pursuant to Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”)., with such review to occur regardless of whether the materiality threshold of that provision is met.

Board and Committee Meetings

 

The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. During 2018,2021, there were seven meetings of the Board of Directors, eightnine meetings of its Audit Committee, three meetings of its Compensation Committee and three meetings of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. All Directors attended 75% or more100% of the meetings of the Board and its committees on which they served that were held following each Director’s appointment to the Board and their respective committees.served. It is our policy that all members of the Board of Directors attend the annual meeting of shareholders and, in 2018,2021, all members attended the meeting. At each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors, the independent Directors have the opportunity to meet separately in executive session.

Board Leadership Structure

 

The Board is led by independent Chairman John M. Timken, Jr., who was first elected to this position on May 13, 2014. In addition, the independent Directors designated Joseph W. Ralston to serve as Lead Director until his retirement at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Board has chosen not to appoint a Lead Director after Mr. Ralston retires.

The Chairman oversees the planning of the annual Board calendar and, with the CEO and in consultation with the other Directors, schedules and sets the agenda for meetings of the Board and leads the discussions at such meetings and at executive sessions of the independent Directors. The Chairman

also leads the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders and performs such other functions and responsibilities as set forth in the Board of Directors General Policies and Procedures or as requested by the Board from time to time.

The Board’s preferred governance structure is to separate the roles of ChairmanChair and CEO. With limited exceptions, these roles haveSince 2014, the Chair of the Board has been separate for over 80 years.independent. While recognizing that there is no single, generally accepted approach to providing Board leadership and that the Board’s leadership structure may vary in the future as circumstances warrant, the Board considers this balance of leadership between the two positions to be beneficial.

Director Compensation

 

Directors who are not Timken employees receive an annual retainer fee, annual committee fees (as applicable) and an annual equity award. The independent Chairman the Lead Director and each committee chairperson receive additional retainer fees. Directors who are Timken employees doRichard G. Kyle, our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), does not receive any additional compensation for theirhis service as Directors.a Director.

Cash Compensation

Each nonemployee Director who served in 20182021 was paid aan annual retainer fee of $80,000 as base compensation for services as a Director. In addition to base compensation, the Lead DirectorJohn M. Timken, Jr. received

an annual fee of $30,000 and$100,000 for his service as the independent Chairman received an annual fee of $100,000.Chairman. The following additional annual fees were paid for serving on a committee of the Board in 2018:2021:

 

Committee  Chairperson Fee   Member Fee   Chairperson Fee      Member Fee    

Audit

   $30,000          $15,000         $30,000  $15,000

Compensation

   $17,500          $7,500         $17,500  $7,500

Nominating & Corporate Governance

   $17,500          $7,500       

Nominating &Corporate Governance

  $17,500  $7,500

To the extent a Director served on the Board or any committee of the Board for only part of the year, such Director received apro-rated portion of the applicable fees based on the amount of time served.

Equity Compensation

Each nonemployee Director serving at the time of our 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 8, 20187, 2021 received a grant of 2,5251,340 restricted stock units that vest after one year under The Timken Company 2011 Long-Term2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan as amended(the “Equity and restated as of February 13, 2015 (the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan”). Upon anon-employee Director’s initial election to the Board, each such Director receives a grant of 2,000 restricted stock units under the Long-TermEquity and Incentive Compensation Plan whichthat vestone-fifth annually from the date of grant. Sarah C. Lauber received such a grant during 2021. Cumulative dividend equivalents are paid in cash upon vesting.

Holding Requirement

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has adopted sharestock ownership requirements for nonemployee Directors equal to five times the annual cash retainer of $80,000, or the equivalent of $400,000 worth of common shares. Directors must meet this requirement within five years of becoming a Director of the Company. In determining whether a Director has met his or her individual ownership target, the Company considers shares owned by the Director and full-value equity awards held by the Director, including restricted shares and restricted stock units still subject to vesting conditions. As of December 31, 2018,2021, all of our Directors other than Ms. HarrellLauber had met their sharestock ownership requirements. Ms. HarrellLauber joined the Board in August 2017January 2021 and she is on track to achieve the ownership requirement within the five-year time frame.

Compensation Deferral

Any Director may elect to defer the receipt of all or a specified portion of histheir cash fees or her cash feestheir annual equity award until a specified point in the future in accordance with the provisions of the Director Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2015 (the “Director Deferred Compensation Plan”). The amountcash amounts deferred can be invested in a cash fund or the hypothetical Timken common share fund. The cash fund provides for interest to be earned quarterly at a rate based onequal to the prime rate plus one percent.1%. If cash fees are invested in the Timken common share fund, Directors may elect to receive cash in an amount equal to any dividend equivalents or reinvest such amounts in the CompanyTimken common share fund. Equity award deferrals are maintained in a separate account, which is credited with the number of shares that would otherwise have been issued or transferred and delivered to the Director. Such accounts are credited from time to time with amounts equal to dividends or other distributions paid on the number of shares reflected in such accounts.

20182021 Director Compensation Table

The following table provides the compensation and benefits applicable to our nonemployee Directors for 2018:2021:

 

Name(1)  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
   Stock    
Awards (2)
��  All Other
Compensation (3)
  Total       

        Fees Earned or        

Paid in Cash

  

Stock

    Awards (2)    

  

All Other

    Compensation (3)     

 

      Total    

Maria A. Crowe

   $104,949          $120,064         $1,566         $226,579         $112,500  $120,319  $3,602  $236,421    

Elizabeth A. Harrell

   $101,442          $120,064         $1,996         $223,502         $95,000  $120,319  $4,314  $219,633    

Sarah C. Lauber

  $100,183  $289,919  -  $390,102    

John A. Luke, Jr.

   $105,000          $120,064         $678         $225,742         $95,000  $120,319  $3,602  $218,921    

Christopher L. Mapes

   $102,500          $120,064         $11,783         $234,347         $102,500  $120,319  $3,602  $226,421    

James F. Palmer

   $108,541          $120,064         $21,230         $249,835         $117,500  $120,319  $3,602  $241,421    

Ajita G. Rajendra

   $102,500          $120,064         $7,888         $230,452         $112,500  $120,319  $3,602  $236,421    

Joseph W. Ralston

   $141,071          $120,064         $12,101         $273,236       

Frank C. Sullivan

   $111,551          $120,064         $678         $232,293         $102,500  $120,319  $3,602  $226,421    

John M. Timken, Jr.

   $180,000          $120,064         $5,588         $305,652         $180,000  $120,319  $3,602  $303,921    

Ward J. Timken, Jr.

   $80,000          $120,064         $678         $200,742         $80,000  $120,319  $3,602  $203,921    

Jacqueline F. Woods

   $95,000          $120,064         $16,259         $231,323         $95,000  $120,319  $3,602  $218,921    

 

 (1)

Richard G. Kyle, our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”),CEO, is not included in this table as he is an employee of the Company and receives no compensation for his services as a Director.

 

 (2)

The amount shown for each Director consists ofincludes the grant date fair value of the award of 2,5251,340 restricted stock units made on May 8, 2018.7, 2021. These restricted stock units vest 100% one year following the grant date. Ms. Harrell elected to defer the award made on May 7, 2021 under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan for distribution in the future. For Ms. Lauber, the amount also includes the grant date fair value of the award of 2,000 restricted stock units made to her on January 8, 2021 in connection with her initial election to the Board, which restricted stock units vest one-fifth annually from the date of grant. The amounts shown in this column are computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 718.

 

 (3)

All other compensation reflects cash dividendsdividend equivalents paid to the Directors in 20182021 for unvested restricted stock units granted in the prior year and cash dividends paid to certain Directors for unvested restricted stock granted in connection with their initial election to the Board, in each case upon vesting of such restricted stock units or restricted shares andin 2021. Ms. Harrell elected to defer her annual restricted stock unit awards granted in 2021 under the incremental valueDirector Deferred Compensation Plan for distribution in the future. The table above includes cash dividend equivalents in the amount of spousal travel for Mr. Mapes, Mr. Palmer, Mr. Rajendra, Mr. Ralston, Mr. John M. Timken, Jr., and$3,602 which were also deferred by Ms. Woods to a Company strategy meeting during 2018.Harrell under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan.

As of December 31, 2018,2021, unvested restricted shares and unvested restricted stock units were ownedheld by the nonemployee Directors as follows:

 Name  

Unvested Restricted Shares
and  

Unvested Restricted
Stock Units

 Maria A. Crowe

  2,925      1,340

 Elizabeth A. Harrell

  4,125      1,740

 Sarah C. Lauber

3,340

 John A. Luke, Jr.

  2,525      1,340

 Christopher L. Mapes

  2,925      1,340

 James F. Palmer

  3,325      1,340

 Ajita G. Rajendra

  2,925      

 Joseph W. Ralston

2,525      1,340

 Frank C. Sullivan

  2,525      1,340

 John M. Timken, Jr.

  2,525      1,340

 Ward J. Timken, Jr.(1)

  2,525      1,340

 Jacqueline F. Woods

  2,525      1,340

 

 (1)

Additionally, Ward J. Timken, Jr. has 454,55092,000 vested and unexercised stock options earned from his previous role as an employee and executive Chairman of the Board of The Timken Company from 2005 to May 2014.

Board Committees

 

Audit Committee

We have a standing Audit Committee that has oversight responsibility with respect to our independent auditor and the integrity of our financial statements. The Audit Committee is composed of James F. Palmer (Audit Committee Chairman)Chair), Maria A. Crowe, Sarah C. Lauber, Christopher L. Mapes, Ajita G. Rajendra and Frank C. Sullivan and Joseph W. Ralston.Sullivan. Our Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and independent as defined in the listing standards of the NYSE and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Our Board of Directors has determined that Sarah C. Lauber, James F. Palmer and Frank C. Sullivan and James F. Palmer qualify as Audit Committee financial experts.

The Audit Committee’s charter is available on the Corporate Governance section of our website atwww.timken.com/about/governance-documentshttps://investors.timken.com/corporate-governance/documents/.

Compensation Committee

We have a standing Compensation Committee that establishes and administers our policies, programs and procedures for compensating our senior management and Board of Directors. Members of the Compensation Committee are John A. Luke, Jr.Ajita G. Rajendra (Compensation Committee Chairman)Chair), Elizabeth A. Harrell, Christopher L. Mapes,Sarah C. Lauber, John A. Luke, Jr., James F. Palmer Ajita G. Rajendra, Joseph W. Ralston and Jacqueline F. Woods. Our Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent as defined in the listing standards of the NYSE.

With the guidance and approval of the Compensation Committee, we have developed compensation programs for our executive officers, including the CEO and the other named executive officers, included in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table, that are intended to align the interests of our executives and shareholders; reward executive management for sustained, strong business and financial results; and enable us to attract, retain and motivate the best talent. The Compensation Committee determines specific compensation elements for the CEO and considers and acts upon the CEO’s recommendations regarding the other executive officers.

The agenda for meetings of the Compensation Committee is determined by its ChairmanChair with the assistance of the Vice PresidentGeneral ManagerCompensation and Benefits.Compensation. The meetings are regularly are attended by the Chairman of the Board, the CEO, the Executive Vice President, – Human Resources, the Corporate General Counsel &

Secretary, and the Vice PresidentGeneral ManagerCompensation and Benefits.Compensation. At each meeting, the Compensation Committee meets in executive session. The ChairmanChair of the Compensation Committee reports the Committee’s actions regarding compensation of executive officers to the full Board.Board and the full Board acts on compensation matters for the CEO. Our Human Resources department supports the Compensation Committee in its duties and may be delegated certain administrative duties in connection with our compensation programs. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate compensation consultants to assist in the evaluation of Director and executive officer compensation and the sole authority to approve the fees and other retention terms of any compensation consultants. The Compensation Committee has engaged Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (“WTW”), a global professional services firm, to conduct annual reviews of its compensation programs for the Company’s executive officers and Directors. WTW also provides information to the Compensation Committee on trends in executive compensation and other market data. WTW (or its predecessor) has provided executive consulting services to the Compensation Committee and other professional consulting services to the Company for over 20 years.

With respect to Director compensation, as stated above, the Compensation Committee annually engages WTW to conduct reviews of Director compensation, and the Committee may then recommend to the full Board changes in Director compensation that will enhance our ability to attract and retain qualified Directors.

During fiscal 2018,year 2021, WTW was paid $250,000approximately $200,000 for the executive and Director compensation consulting services it provided to the Compensation Committee. Other professional consulting services provided by WTW to the Company, which were requested by management, not approved by the Compensation Committee or the Board and not related to executive compensation, totaled approximately $2.5$1.75 million, for actuarial, pension administration and other services (including health benefits, broad-based compensation, human capital, investment advisory and international consulting). Of the $2.5 million in fees incurred in 2018 for other professional consulting services, approximately $2.2 millionmost of which (greater than $1.6 million) related to retirement consulting and outsourcing of pension administrativeadministration services.

The Compensation Committee has concluded that the advice it receives from WTW continues to be objective, unbiased and independent. The Compensation Committee’s careful oversight of the relationship with WTW with respect to compensation advice mitigates the risk that management potentially could misuse the actuarial engagement to influence WTW’s compensation work for the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the charges to the Company from WTW for executive and Director compensation advice and other services for the preceding three years, along with an estimate of services for the coming year. Additionally, WTW has adopted internal safeguards to ensure that its executive compensation unit is maintained separately from its actuarial business.

The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of WTW, as required under the listing standards of the NYSE. The Compensation Committee also has considered and assessed relevant factors that could give rise to a potential conflict of interest with respect to WTW, specifically including the six consultant independence factors under Rule10C-1(b)(4)(i) through (vi) under the 1934 Act. Based on this review, we are not aware of any conflict of interest regarding the work performed by WTW.

The Compensation Committee also plays an active role in our executive officer succession planning process. The Compensation Committee meets regularly with senior management to ensure that an effective succession planning process is in place and to discuss potential successors for executive officers. As part of this process, executive officer position profiles are updated to highlight the key skills required to meet future demands, and potential successors are evaluated and development plans are reviewed. Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews and discusses potential successors for each of the executive officers with the full Board in executive session. In addition, at the end of each year, the Compensation Committee reviews the performance of each of the executive officers. The Compensation Committee is also periodically updated regarding more broad-based human capital focused initiatives such as pay equity studies and, alongside the remainder of the Board, employee engagement surveys.

The Compensation Committee’s charter is available on the Corporate Governance section of our website atwww.timken.com/about/governance-documentshttps://investors.timken.com/corporate-governance/documents/. For more information regarding the role of management and the compensation consultants in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive compensation,

see “CompensationDiscussion and Analysis – Determining Compensation for 20182021” on page 35.44.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

We have a standing Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee that is responsible for, among other things, evaluating new Director candidates and incumbent Directors, and recommending Directors to serve as members of our Board committees.committees, and providing oversight of the Company’s CSR program. Members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Maria A. Crowe (Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair), Elizabeth A. Harrell, John A. Luke, Jr., Joseph W. Ralston,Christopher L. Mapes, Frank C. Sullivan and Jacqueline F. Woods. Our Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent as defined in the listing standards of the NYSE.

The Board of Directors General Policies and Procedures provide that the general criteria for Director candidates include, but are not limited to, the highest standards of integrity and ethical behavior, the ability to provide wise and informed guidance to management, a willingness to pursue thoughtful, objective inquiry on important issues before the Company and a range of experience and knowledge commensurate with our needs as well as the expectations of knowledgeable investors.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes a variety of sources to identify possible Director candidates, including search firms, professional associations and Director recommendations. In evaluating candidates to recommend to the Board of Directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers factors consistent with those set forth in the Board of Directors General Policies and Procedures, including whether the candidate enhances the diversity of the Board. Such diversity includes professional background and capabilities, knowledge of specific industries and geographic experience, as well as the more traditional diversity concepts of race, gender and national origin. The attributes of the current Directors and the needs of the Board and the Company are evaluated whenever a Board vacancy occurs, and the effectiveness of the nomination process, including whether that process enhances the Board’s diversity, is evaluated each time a candidate is considered. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also is responsible for reviewing the qualifications of, and making recommendations to the Board of Directors for, Director nominations submitted by our shareholders. All Director nominees are evaluated in the same manner by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, without regard to the source of the nominee recommendation.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also plans for Director succession. The Committee regularly reviews the size of the Board and whether any vacancies are expected due to retirement, refreshment or otherwise. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to maintain an appropriate mix of newer Directors who bring fresh perspectives with longer-tenured Directors who have deep knowledge of our global operations and long-term strategy. In the event that vacancies are anticipated or otherwise arise, the Committee considers potential Director candidates in accordance with the factors and criteria outlined above.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter is available on the Corporate Governance section of our website atwww.timken.com/about/governance-documentshttps://investors.timken.com/corporate-governance/documents/.

Our code of business conduct and ethics, called the “Standards of Business Ethics,” and our corporate governance guidelines, called the “Board of Directors General Policies and Procedures,” are reviewed annually by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as appropriate and are available on the Corporate Governance section of our website atwww.timken.com/about/governance-documentshttps://investors.timken.com/corporate-governance/documents/.

Shareholder-Recommended Director Candidates

Director candidates recommended by our shareholders will be considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in accordance with the criteria outlined above. In order for a shareholder to submit a recommendation, the shareholder must deliver a communication by registered mail or in person to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o The Timken Company, 4500 Mt. Pleasant Street NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720. Such communication should include the proposed candidate’s qualifications, any relationship between the shareholder and the proposed candidate, and any other information that the shareholder considers useful for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to consider in evaluating such candidate.

Shareholder-Nominated Director Candidates

Our Amended Regulations provide a “proxy access” right to permit any shareholder or a group of up to 20 shareholders owning 3% or more of the voting power entitled to vote in the election of Directors continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in our proxy materials Director nominees for election to the Board. A shareholder or shareholders, as applicable, can nominate up to the greater of (i) 20% of the total number of Directors on the Board, rounding down to the nearest whole number, and (ii) two Directors in accordance with the requirements set forth in our Amended Regulations. Under our Amended Regulations, requests to include shareholder-nominated candidates for Director in our proxy materials must be received no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days before the anniversary of the date that we issued our Proxy Statement for the previous year’s annual meeting of shareholders. Requests to include shareholder-nominated candidates for Director in our proxy materials related to the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested, to our CorporateVice President, General Counsel & Secretary, c/o The Timken Company, 4500 Mt. Pleasant Street NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720, no earlier than October 24, 201919, 2022 and no later than November 23, 201918, 2022 in order to be timely. The  summary of this “proxy access” right set forth above is qualified in its entirety by our Amended Regulations.

Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility Highlights

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly reviews trends and recommends best practices, initiates improvements, and plays a leadership role in maintaining the Company’s strong corporate governance structure and practices. AmongThe below table details the practices the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes demonstrate the Company’s commitment to strong corporate governance areand additional information about the following:Company’s corporate governance structure and practices can be found in the Board of Directors General Policies and Procedures, our Amended Regulations and our Amended Articles of Incorporation.

  Board Independence, Refreshment, Diversity and Experience

Strongly independent Board (9(10 of 1112 Director nominees are independent);

Independent Chairman of the Board;Board

  Commitment to Board refreshment and diversity – 7 new Directors (representing over half of our Board) added in the past decade

  5 of 12 Directors are ethnically or gender diverse

  3 Audit Committee financial experts

  6 current or former public company Chief Executive Officers currently serve on the Board

  Shareholder Rights

  Shareholder proxy access with 3/3/20/20 parameters

  Special meetings may be called by shareholders holding 25% of the Company’s common shares

  Other Strong Governance Practices

Declassified Board – all Directors are elected annually;annually

Annual Board, Committee and Director evaluations;evaluations

Commitment to Board refreshment and diversity – 5 new independent Directors since 2014;

Shareholder proxy access with 3/3/20/20 parameters;

Majority Voting Policy that requires any Director who fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in favor of his or her election to submit his or her resignation to the Board;Board

Over-boarding policy limits the number of public company boards a Director can serve on;on

Special meetings may be called by shareholders holding 25% of the Company’s common shares;

Clawback” policy permits clawbackprovisions permit recovery of executive compensation if an executive engages in conduct that is detrimental to the Company;Company and that results in restatement of financial results

Stock ownership requirements for Directors and executive officers.officers

  Audit Committee or Board receives reports on cyber security threats and trends at least annually and receives regular updates on our information security program

  Strong focus on shareholder engagement – over 400 interactions with investors in 2021

Additional information aboutThe Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also provides oversight of our CSR program, though the Company’s corporate governance structure and practices can be found in thefull Board of Directors General Policiesas well as its other standing committees also play a role in advising on certain CSR-related topics such as human capital initiatives and Procedures,risk oversight.

Oversight and Management of the Company’s CSR Program

LOGO

Provides oversight of our CSR program

Champions our CSR efforts and liaises with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on CSR developments

Vice President,General Counsel& Secretary, Vice President, Human Resources, and Director – Corporate Communications provide management oversight and leadership to the steering committee

Cross-functionalteamcharged withmonitoring andevaluatingcurrentandfuture CSRinitiatives,recommending strategies, managing data collectionprocesses, andreportingonCompany progress

Consists of leaders in operations, compensation and benefits, HR, communications, legal, environmental, supply chain and other key functional areas

In 2021, we continued to expand upon our Amended RegulationsCSR program and further detailed our Amended Articlesefforts to support our stakeholders as a socially responsible corporation. Our CSR program is guided by our core values of Incorporation.

ethics and integrity, quality, teamwork and excellence. Our goal is to create real-world impact in three clearly defined areas: the pursuit and expansion of knowledge, sustainability, and leadership. These areas are aligned with our core competencies and focus our efforts towards achieving greater equity and efficiency for a world in motion. Some of the Company’s current initiatives that promote our three focus areas are set forth below:

  Focus Area

Knowledge

Sustainability

Leadership

Certain Key Topics

Learning and Development; Diversity and Inclusion; Compensation, Benefits and Wellbeing

Product Stewardship; Energy, Emissions and Waste; Health, Safety and Mitigation

Ethics and Corporate Governance; STEM and Mentorship; Community and Charitable Giving

Initiatives

•  Enhancing diversity and inclusion initiatives to encourage global, diverse viewpoints

•  Deploying comprehensive employee surveys to inform efforts that increase associate engagement and satisfaction

•  Rewarding associates with strong wages and competitive benefits to recognize professional excellence and career progression

•  Investing in associate education, training and development programs to support a culture of learning

•  Embracing energy efficiency, pollution prevention, waste management and recycling programs at Timken global facilities to reduce our environmental footprint

•  Engineering innovative products that increase the energy efficiency of machinery and equipment and propel the renewable energy sector

•  Continuously improving our world-class safety programs to protect associate health and safety, resulting in record performance

•  Upholding strong corporate governance principles and practices to promote the interests of the Company and its stakeholders

•  Leading with and living our values every day, while operating ethically and responsibly in accordance with our Standards of Business Ethics

•  Building and investing in communities where we live and work through associate and corporate-led giving, partnership and volunteerism

•  Promoting and protecting recognized human rights in our local communities

CSR Report Highlights                                

  Knowledge

40% of current participants in our U.S. bearing co-op program are ethnically or gender diverse.

Currently, we have three associate resource groups that are open to all associates, regardless of race, ethnicity, gender identity and age: Women’s International Network, Multicultural Association of Professionals, and Young Professionals Network

Examples of regular, formal training and development activities include:

• Harvard ManageMentor® Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging course for managers;

• Our Engaged Leader program, which provides learning opportunities to further our culture of connectedness and growth through consistent conversations and team meetings;

• The Signature Program, with whom we have collaborated since 2014 to augment development and support Timken female leaders in enriching their leadership capabilities; and

• The Operations Development Program, an accelerated training program designed to increase the internal pool of people prepared to take on our Company’s leadership positions.

We are also committed to providing competitive and equitable compensation based on the local markets in which we operate while supporting employee health. We conduct market studies around the world to ensure full-time associates receive competitive benefits relative to the markets where they work.

  SustainabilityThrough our industrial repair and service business, we recycle numerous tons of steel and copper each year from service parts that cannot be reused.
Working with our supplier, Ranpak, one of the global leaders in environmentally friendly packaging, we are replacing plastic bubble dunnage with rigid paper dunnage that can be reused and recycled. So far, we have converted eight U.S. facilities to sustainable paper packaging and we are working on extending the program internationally.
Over the last four years, our manufacturing facilities have implemented several programs recycling more than 1,000 metric tons of plastic.
2020 represented our lowest recordable injury rate on record.
From 2018 to 2020, our total waste generation has decreased by over 40% and our total waste to landfill has decreased by over 15%, despite adding more sites to the scope of our reporting.

In 2020, renewable energy became our single largest end-market sector in terms of total sales and it remained so in 2021. The Company’s products, technology and innovation continue to support the global trend towards sustainability and meet customers’ evolving requirements for optimized reliability and performance. In addition, the Company has announced more than $75 million in capital investments through early 2022 to increase the Company’s renewable energy capabilities across its global footprint.

  LeadershipOur corporate charitable giving focus areas for 2020 included associate giving, basic needs, education, and reputation and community building.
In 2020, we gave in excess of $1.6 million in the U.S. alone to support basic needs, education, and community building.
We have also committed to being a STEM partner for the I PROMISE School, a collaboration between the LeBron James Family Foundation and Akron Public Schools.
We published our enterprise-wide human rights policy which details, amongst other items, our:

• Stance against human trafficking and forced labor;

• Care for the health and safety of our associates and others;

• Embrace of diversity and intolerance of discrimination;

• Commitment to competitive and equitable pay;

• Respect for the principles of freedom of association and collective bargaining;

• Promotion of the development of our communities; and

• Support for access to clean water.

In consideration of our efforts, we were named one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies® by Ethisphere® Institute for the eleventh time, among America’s Most Responsible Companies by Newsweek and Statista and one of America’s Best Employers, America’s Best Employers for New Graduates and America’s Best Employers for Women by Forbes in 2021.

For more information regarding our corporate social responsibility program, please see our most recent corporate social responsibility report available on our website at https://www.timken.com/ corporate-social-responsibility/.

Shareholder Engagement in 2021

LOGO

Risk Oversight

 

The Board of Directors primarily relies on its Audit Committee for oversight of the Company’s risk management. The Audit Committee regularly reviews issues that present particular risks to the Company, including those involving competition, customer demands,competition; economic conditions,conditions; planning strategy, finance,and strategy; finance; sales and marketing,marketing; product technology innovation,and innovation; information technology and cybersecurity,cybersecurity; facilities, operations and operations, supply chain,chain; environmental, health and safety; product warrantywarranty; talent management; and legalother matters. The full Board and other Committees also reviewsreview certain of these issues as appropriate. The Board believes that this approach, supported by our leadership structure, provides appropriate checks and balances against undue risk taking.

Shareholder Communications

 

Shareholders or interested parties may send communications to the Board of Directors, to any standing committee of the Board, or to any Director, in writing c/o The Timken Company, 4500 Mt. Pleasant Street NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720. Shareholders or interested parties also may submit questions, concerns or reports of misconduct through the Timken Helpline at1-800-846-5363 and may remain anonymous. Such communications may be reviewed by the office of the CorporateVice President, General Counsel & Secretary to ensure appropriate and careful review of the matter.

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON SHARES

The following table shows, as of January 1, 2019,2022, the beneficial ownership of our common shares by each Director, nominee for Director and executive officer named in the 20182021 Summary Compensation Table on page 4958 of this Proxy Statement, and by all Directors, nominees for Director and executive officers as a group. Beneficial ownership of our common shares has been determined for this purpose in accordance with Rule13d-3 under the 1934 Act and is based on the sole or shared power to vote or direct the voting or to dispose or direct the disposition of our common shares. Beneficial ownership as determined in this manner does not necessarily bear on the economic incidents of ownership of our common shares.

 

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of common shares
Name  Sole Voting or Investment
Power(1)
 Shared Voting or
Investment Power
  Aggregate Amount(1)   Percent of  
Class
                       

Carolyn E. Cheverine

    39,219   0    39,219   *

Christopher A. Coughlin

    319,016   0    319,016   *

Maria A. Crowe

    12,044   0    12,044   *

Philip D. Fracassa

    157,996   0    157,996   *

Elizabeth A. Harrell

    2,061   0    2,061   *

Richard G. Kyle

    654,873   0    654,873   *

John A. Luke, Jr.

    59,440   0    59,440   *

Christopher L. Mapes

    13,050   0    13,050   *

Ronald J. Myers

    58,830   0    58,830   *

James F. Palmer

    8,095   0    8,095   *

Ajita G. Rajendra

    11,140   0    11,140   *

Joseph W. Ralston

    54,145   0    54,145   *

Frank C. Sullivan

    51,932   0    51,932   *

John M. Timken, Jr.

    572,375(2)    900,788    1,473,163(2)    1.94%    

Ward J. Timken, Jr.

    930,455   4,936,963    5,867,418   7.72%    

Jacqueline F. Woods

    15,878   0    15,878   *
All Directors, nominees for Director and executive officers as a group(3)    2,960,549   5,837,751    8,798,300   11.58%    

* Percent of class is less than 1%.

        Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of common shares

  
Name (1)  

Sole Voting or Investment

Power (2)

 

Shared Voting or

Investment Power

 Aggregate Amount (2)
 

Percent of  

Class

Christopher A. Coughlin

   263,801               0           263,801           *         

Maria A. Crowe

   20,511   0   20,511   * 

Philip D. Fracassa

   150,482   0   150,482   * 

Elizabeth A. Harrell

   10,511   0   10,511   * 

Richard G. Kyle

   645,619   0   645,619   * 

Sarah C. Lauber

   400   0   400   * 

John A. Luke, Jr.

   68,753   0   68,753   * 

Christopher L. Mapes

   21,160   0   21,160   * 

James F. Palmer

   16,205   0   16,205   * 

Hansal N. Patel

   7,497   0   7,497   * 

Ajita G. Rajendra

   19,250   0   19,250   * 

Andreas Roellgen

   83,174   0   83,174   * 

Frank C. Sullivan

   60,042   0   60,042   * 

John M. Timken, Jr.

   457,785(3)   915,427   1,372,912(3)   1.82

Ward J. Timken, Jr.

   607,562   4,714,291   5,321,853   7.06

Jacqueline F. Woods

   18,088   0   18,088   * 
All Directors, nominees for Director and executive officers as a group(4)   2,506,505   5,629,718   8,136,223   10.79
 * Percent of class is less than 1%.     

(1)

Excludes Ronald J. Myers due to his retirement from the Company on November 30, 2021. At the time of his retirement, Mr. Myers possessed sole voting or investment power over 25,561 common shares.

(2)

The following table provides additional details regarding beneficial ownership of our common shares:

 

Name  

Outstanding
Options and Time-
based Restricted
Stock Units (a)

 

   Vested Deferred
Restricted Shares (b)
   Deferred common
shares(b)
   

Outstanding Options and Time-

based Restricted Stock Units (a)

 Deferred common shares  (b)
   

Carolyn E. Cheverine

   39,219            0                    0                 

Christopher A. Coughlin

   232,468            0                    0                    170,081              0              

Maria A. Crowe

   0            0                    0                    0  0  

Philip D. Fracassa

   115,706            0��                   0                    72,569  0  

Elizabeth A. Harrell

   0            0                    0                    0  5,585  

Richard G. Kyle

   542,438            0                    0                    349,231  0  

Sarah C. Lauber

   400  0  

John A. Luke, Jr.

   0            0                    0                    0  0  

Christopher L. Mapes

   0            0                    0                    0  0  

Ronald J. Myers

   41,798            0                    0                 

James F. Palmer

   0  0  

James F. Palmer

   0            0                    0                 

Hansal N. Patel

   3,514  0  

Ajita G. Rajendra

   0            0                    0                    0  0  

Joseph W. Ralston

   0            0                    12,000                 

Andreas Roellgen

   23,175  0  

Frank C. Sullivan

   0            0                    2,000                    0  2,000  

John M. Timken, Jr.

   0            0                    0                    0  0  

Ward J. Timken, Jr.

   454,550            0                    0                    92,000  0  

Jacqueline F. Woods

   0            0                    2,500                    0  2,500   

 

 (a)

Includes shares that the individual named in the table has the right to acquire on or before March 1, 20192022 through the exercise of stock options or the vesting of time-based restricted stock units pursuant to the Long-TermEquity and Incentive Compensation Plan. Including those listed and other executive officers not individually listed in the table, all Directors, nominees for Director, and executive officers as a group have the right to acquire 1,426,179737,595 shares on or before March 1, 20192022 through the exercise of stock options or the vesting of time-based restricted stock units pursuant to the Long-TermEquity and Incentive Compensation Plan. These shares have been treated as outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage of the class beneficially owned by such individual or group, but not for the purpose of calculating the percentage of the class owned by any other person.

 

 (b)

Awarded as annual grants under the Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan or The Timken Company 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of February 13, 2015 (the “Predecessor Long-Term Incentive Plan”), which will not be issued until a later date under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan. Restricted shares can no longer be deferred.

 

 (2)(3)

Includes 182,166 shares for which John M. Timken, Jr. has sole voting and investment power as trustee of three trusts created as the result of distributions from the estate of Susan H. Timken. Also includes 126,000 shares held in an irrevocable trust with his spouse as the sole lifetime beneficiary for which he disclaims beneficial interest.

 

 (3)(4)

Includes 55,965 shares beneficially owned by other executive officers not individually listed in the table. The number of shares beneficially owned by all Directors, nominees for Director and

executive officers as a group has been calculated to eliminate duplication of beneficial ownership. This group consists of 1617 individuals.

The following table gives information known to us about each beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common shares as of January 1, 2019,2022, unless otherwise indicated below:

 

Beneficial Owner

 

  

Number of Shares

 

  

      Percent of Class      

 

  Timken family(1)

    9,184,823    12.09%

  The Vanguard Group(2)

    6,449,106    8.39%

  BlackRock, Inc.(3)

    6,254,286    8.10%
Beneficial Owner  Number of Shares Percent of Class      

  The Vanguard Group(1)

   6,672,981           8.85%                

  BlackRock, Inc.(2)

   5,660,394   7.51 

  The Timken Foundation of Canton(3)

   4,652,481   6.17 

  JPMorgan Chase & Co.(4)

   4,153,514   5.51 

 

 (1)

Members ofA Schedule 13G/A filed with the Timken family, including John M. Timken, Jr. and Ward J. Timken, Jr.SEC on February 10, 2022, by The Vanguard Group, 100 Vanguard Blvd., have in the aggregateMalvern, Pennsylvania 19355, indicated that it has sole orvoting power over 0 common shares, shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 9,639,373 of ourover 37,895 common shares, which includes 454,550sole investment power over 6,581,839 common shares, shared investment power over 91,142 common shares and aggregate beneficial ownership of 6,672,981 common shares.

(2)

A Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 1, 2022, by BlackRock, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055, indicated that Ward J. Timken, Jr.it has sole voting power over 5,425,615 common shares and sole investment power over 5,660,394 common shares.

(3)

A Schedule 13G/A filed with the right to acquireSEC on or before March 1, 2019.February 14, 2022, by The Timken Foundation of Canton (the “Foundation”), 200 Market Avenue North, Suite 210, Canton, Ohio 44702, holds 4,875,153 of these shares, representing 6.42% of our outstandingindicated that it has sole voting and investment power over 4,652,481 common shares. Ward J. Timken, Joy A. Timken, Ward J. Timken, Jr. and William R. Timken, Jr. are trustees of the Foundation and share the voting and investment power with respect to shares held by the Foundation. All trustees disclaim any beneficial interest in such shares. The Foundation is an Ohio private charitable foundation that is independent of the Company.

There are no voting agreements or other arrangements among the members of the Timken family regarding the 9,639,373 common shares and, accordingly, the members of the Timken family shall not be deemed a “group” for purposes of Rule13d-3 under the 1934 Act with respect to such shares. Accordingly, each member of the Timken family disclaims beneficial ownership of any of our common shares as to which such member does not have sole or shared voting or investment power.

 

 (2)(4)

A Schedule 13G/A13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2019,January 28, 2022, by The Vanguard Group, 100 Vanguard Blvd.JPMorgan Chase & Co., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355,383 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10179, indicated that it has sole voting power over 33,3224,092,584 common shares, shared voting power over 0 common shares, sole investment power over 6,414,2654,153,442 common shares, shared investment power over 72 common shares and aggregate beneficial ownership of 6,449,1064,153,442 common shares.

(3)

A Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 6, 2019, by BlackRock, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055, indicated that it has sole voting power over 5,938,612 common shares and sole investment power over 6,254,286 common shares.

PROPOSAL NO. 2: SHAREHOLDER ADVISORY VOTE TOAPPROVAL, ON AN

APPROVEADVISORY BASIS, OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER

COMPENSATION

We believe that our compensation programs for our named executive officers:

 

 · 

align the interests of executive management with those of our shareholders;

 · 

reward executive management for sustained, strong business and financial results; and

 · 

enable us to attract, retain and motivate the best talent.

As required under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Section 14A of the 1934 Act, we are asking you to approve, on an advisory(non-binding) basis, the following resolution at our 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:

RESOLVED, that the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and any related material disclosed in this Proxy Statement, is hereby APPROVED.

As an advisory vote, this resolution is not binding on us. However, the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering our executive compensation program, values the opinions expressed by our shareholders in their vote on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers. We currently are conducting this advisory vote, commonly known as a“say-on-pay” vote, every year and expect to hold the nextsay-on-pay vote in connection with our 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this matter is necessary for approval of this resolution. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted for determining whether this resolution is approved.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR APPROVAL, ON ANFOR APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION.

ADVISORY BASIS, OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This section provides a summary of our named executive officer compensation program, key compensation decisions, and performance targets and results for incentive plans in which our named executive officers participated for the year endingended December 31, 2018.2021. For 2018,2021, our named executive officers (or “NEOs”) were:

 

 · 

Richard G. Kyle, President and CEO;

 · 

Philip D. Fracassa, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer;

 · 

Christopher A. Coughlin, Executive Vice President, Group President;

 ·

Hansal N. Patel, Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary;

·

Andreas Roellgen, Vice President, Europe, Asia and Africa; and

· 

Ronald J. Myers, former Executive Vice President, Human Resources; and

Carolyn E. Cheverine, former Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.Resources.

Effective as of July 19, 2018, Ms. Cheverine ceased servingMr. Myers retired from his position as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and her employment with the Company ended. There were no other executive officers servingHuman Resources effective as of December 31, 2018.November 30, 2021.

Executive Compensation Philosophy

We design our executive compensation plans and programs to help us attract, motivate, reward and retain highly qualified executives who are capable of creating and sustaining value for our shareholders over the long term. The structure of our programs enables us to provide a competitive compensation and benefits package while aligning senior executive interests with those of our shareholders. The following chart highlights the key considerations behind the development, review and approval of the compensation for our NEOs:

Objectives  

Philosophy

Our executive compensation program is designed to:

   Align the interests of our executives and shareholders

   Reward for sustained, strong business results

   Attract, retain and motivate the best talent

Philosophy  

Our executive compensation philosophy is built on the following principles:

· Align the interests of our executives and shareholders

· Recognizing that people are our most important assetresource

· Reward sustained, strong business results

· Rewarding results linked to both short- and long-term performance (pay-for-performance)(pay-for-performance)

· Incentivize profitable growth and capital deployment discipline

· Positioning our pay to be competitive in the marketplace

· Attract, retain and motivate the best talent

· Focusing on increasing shareholder value

20182021 Performance

 

2018 was an outstanding yearTimken delivered record-setting performance in 2021, despite the unprecedented supply chain challenges and inflationary pressures that accelerated during the year. The unwavering commitment of our employees allowed the Company to continue to operate safely and effectively serve customers’ increased demand for Timken on a number of fronts, with strong operatingTimken’s products and services – all while advancing our strategic initiatives.

In 2021, our financial performance both year-over-yearbenefited from strong demand across most end markets, as well as our operational excellence and as compared against other industrial peers.outgrowth initiatives. We profitablyalso made additional investments to increase our presence in growing sectors like renewable energy and marine, while continuing to optimize our manufacturing footprint to deliver higher returns through the business cycle. The Company grew the Companyrevenue and earnings significantly in 2018, increasing2021, with record revenue of $4.13 billion, an increase of approximately 19% to $3.58 billion,18% from 2020, net income increasing approximately 49%30% to $302.8$369 million and adjusted EBIT by

EBITDA increasing approximately 52%9% to $500.5$718 million32 million.. We achieved strongrecord EPS of $3.86$4.79 and record adjusted EPS of $4.18$4.7232, up approximately 50%29% and 59%15%, respectively, from the prior2020. We also delivered an adjusted ROIC of 11.0%2 in 2021, up from 9.9% last year. The adjusted EPS for 2018 was 37% higher than any previous year in the Company’s history. In addition, we generated ROICnet cash from operations of 12.8%$387 million and free cash flow of $23932 million in 2018, an improvement of 230 basis points from the prior year.2021.

 

LOGOLOGO

Our Company’s strong performance during 2018,2021, discussed throughout the Compensation Discussion &and Analysis (“CD(the “CD&A”), resulted in above-targetbelow-target annual cash incentive compensation plan payouts for 2018. Similarly, improved2021, due to lower than targeted free cash flow (driven mainly by higher working capital) and slightly lower earnings and operating margins as compared to target (driven mainly by higher operating costs to serve customers). The number of performance-based restricted stock units earned for the 2019-2021 cycle were slightly below target, reflecting strong overall performance overin a challenging environment, as the targets were set in early-2019, prior to the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our cumulative 2019-2021 EPS and adjusted EPS increased 61% and 50%2 respectively, as compared with the 2016-2018 cycle particularly in 2017 and 2018, resulted in slightly above-target payouts from 2016-2018 performance-based restricted stock units.which was used as the basis for setting the 2019-2021 targets. Average adjusted ROIC as compared across those same periods remained relatively consistent. See page 3848 for details on annual cash incentive award decisions, and20182021 Long-Term Incentive Decisions” on page 4150 for more details on long-term incentive award payouts. Overall, executiveour NEO compensation for 20182021 reflects our compensation objectives and demonstrates our strong financial and operating performance, demonstrating a long-standing commitment to pay our executives based upon the performance they deliver.

2021 also marked the release of our third annual corporate social responsibility report, which detailed our vision to build a more efficient and resilient world. The report highlights how we continue to advance our corporate social responsibility initiatives by promoting a culture of problem solvers with a strong focus on sustainable products and practices across the Company, while maintaining a strong commitment to ethics. See page 25 for more details on our most recent corporate social responsibility report.

Our commitment to creating long-term shareholder value is reflected in our disciplined and balanced approach to capital allocation. During 2021, we generated net cash from operations of approximately $387 million and free cash flow of $2392 million. This cash generation allowed us to invest in the business for future growth and continue to return cash to shareholders. We invested approximately $148 million, or 3.6% of revenue, in capital expenditures to facilitate growth and improve the competitiveness of our business. We also returned $185 million in cash to shareholders through the payment of dividends and the repurchase of approximately 1.25 million shares of stock, or over 1.7% of our outstanding shares, during the year. In 2021, we paid out our 398th consecutive quarterly dividend and increased our quarterly dividend to $0.30/share in the second quarter, continuing one of the longest continuous dividend streaks on the NYSE and making 2021 the eighth consecutive year of higher annual dividends. The Company also expanded its linear motion portfolio with the acquisition of Intelligent Machine Solutions (“iMS”). We ended the year with a strong balance sheet with total debt of $1.46 billion and net debt of $1.212 billion. Our net-debt-to-adjusted-EBITDA ratio of 1.72 times at December 31, 2021, is near the low-end of our 1.5 to 2.5 times targeted range and puts us in an excellent position to drive our strategy and create shareholder value in 2022 and beyond.

 

 

32 SeeAppendix A for reconciliations of adjusted EBIT,EPS, adjusted EPS,EBITDA, free cash flow, adjusted ROIC, net debt, and ROICthe ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. Free cash flow is defined as net cash from operations minus capital expenditures. Adjusted ROIC is calculateddefined as adjusted net operating profit after taxesANOPAT divided by average invested capital. TheseThe performance metrics discussed above are used for external reporting and may not correlate exactly to their corresponding compensation adjusted metrics due to slightly different adjustmentsslight differences in methodology (see pages 40, 42 and 4348 to 52 for more details on how the compensation adjusted metrics are calculated). Amounts for fiscal year 2016 are restated to account for there-measurement of pension and other post-retirement assets and obligations, otherwise known asmark-to-market accounting, which the Company adopted in 2017.

    LOGOLOGO
Based out of North Shores, Michigan, iMS is a manufacturer of industrial robotics and automation solutions, which expands the Company’s growing linear motion portfolio.

Our commitment to creating long-term shareholder value is reflected in our multi-faceted approach to capital allocation. We generated net cash from operations of approximately $332.5 million and free cash flow of $219.94 million. We invested approximately $112.6 million in capital expenditures to grow and improve the competitiveness of our business, which strengthened our global leadership position in tapered roller bearings, grew our offering in industrial bearings and other products, and captured market share. In addition, we returned $184.2 million in capital to shareholders through the payment of dividends and the repurchase of 2.3 million shares, or approximately 3% of our outstanding shares, during the year. We allocated approximately $8315 million towards three acquisitions that significantly expanded our power transmission portfolio and geographic reach (Cone Drive - a leader in precision drives, Rollon - a leader in engineered linear motion products, and ABC Bearings - which strengthened our position in the growing India bearing market).

ExecutionStrong execution of our strategy has created shareholder value by delivering TSR of 12.2%25.5%, 1.5%14.3%, and 12.8%12.1% over the past three-, five-, andten-year periods, respectively. Our three-year and five-year TSR which reflectsoutpaced the executionmedian of our new strategy following2021 compensation peer group and also exceeded the Spinoff, outpaced bothS&P 500 Industrials over these respective timeframes, while our compensation peersten-year TSR was just slightly below our peer median and the S&P 500 index, while our five-year TSR outpaced our compensation peers,Industrials. The S&P 500 Industrials comprises those companies included in each case over the same respective timeframes. Ourten-year TSR, which reflects the alignment of our strategy with long-term shareholder value creation, was slightly below both the S&P 500 index and our compensation peers over the same timeframe. Additionally, we increased and paid out our 386th consecutive quarterly dividend, continuing onethat are classified as members of the longest active streaks on the NYSE and making 2018 the fifth consecutive year of annual dividend increases.GICS industrials sector.

 

LOGOLOGO

*Total Shareholder ReturnTSR for the Company was calculated on an annualized basis and assumes quarterly reinvestment of dividends anddividends. The 10-year period takes into account the value of TimkenSteel common shares distributed in the Spinoff.

**See page 3543 for the companies that are included in the compensation peer group for 2018.2020.

4 SeeAppendix A for reconciliation of free cash flow to its most directly comparable GAAP equivalent.

5 ABC Bearings was acquired using shares of the Company’s majority-owned subsidiary, Timken India Limited, and the target value of***The S&P 500 Industrials comprises those shares iscompanies included in the $831 million.

While TSR is one measure of performance, we believeS&P 500 index that our EPS and adjusted EPS demonstrate a significant link between our overall performance and our executive compensation practices. To demonstrate this strong link, the table below provides year-over-year changes in EPS and CEO compensationare classified as disclosed in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table (“CEO SCT Compensation”).

LOGO

Note: 2014-2016 results depicted above are as reported and prior to the adoption ofmark-to-market accounting.

*SeeAppendix A for reconciliation of adjusted EPS to its most directly comparable GAAP equivalent.

**Realized compensation was generally lower than CEO SCT Compensation shown in the chart above due to below target payouts for performance-based restricted stock unit cycles during most of these periods: (a) 2011-2013 cycle – 119% of target paid in 2014; (b) 2012-2014 cycle – 71% of target paid in 2015; (c) 2013-2015 cycle – 69% of target paid in 2016; (d) 2014-2016 cycle – 100% paid in 2017; and (e) 2015-2017 cycle – 55% of target paid in 2018. For the 2014-2016 cycle, the Compensation Committee awarded cliff-vesting time-based restricted stock units instead of performance-based restricted stock units because it was unable to set meaningful multi-year performance targets due to the Spinoff and it believed that cliff-vesting, time-based restricted stock units would provide a strong incentive for employees to remain committed to the Company during the implementationmembers of the Spinoff.GICS industrials sector.

20182021 Compensation Decisions and Actions

 

 

Factors Guiding Our Decisions

(see page 35 for details)

   Executive compensation program objectives and philosophy

   Financial performance

   CEO recommendations for other NEOs

   Assessment of risk management, including avoidance of unnecessary or excessive risk taking to ensure long-term shareholder value

   Shareholder input including“say-on-pay” vote

   Advice of independent outside compensation consultant

   General market and peer company pay practices

   Current and historical compensation

   Performance across key financial metrics, including TSR, compared to U.S. industrial peers and global bearing companies

   General market conditions and cyclicality of the markets in which we operate

Program Updates Implemented at the Beginning of 2018

   Eliminated the financial planning allowance for NEOs.

   Added adjusted EBIT margin to the annual cash incentive program as a third metric to shift weight from quantity of earnings to quality of earnings.

   Shifted weighting from adjusted EPS to adjusted ROIC in the long-term incentive program to increase emphasis on return on invested capital.

Key 2018

Compensation Decisions

(see page 38 for details)

The compensation decisions outlined below demonstrate the multiple factors guiding our compensation decisions.

Base Salary

CEO: Mr. Kyle received a base salary increase of 5.6% in March 2018. His last base salary increase prior to this was in May 2014.

Other NEOs: Mr. Fracassa received a base salary increase of 5.0% in March 2018. Ms. Cheverine, Mr. Coughlin and Mr. Myers received base salary increases of 3.0% in March 2018.

 

  Factors Guiding Our   Decisions

 

  (see page 44 for details)

 

 

· Executive compensation program objectives and philosophy

 

· Financial performance

 

· CEO recommendations for other NEOs

 

· Assessment of risk management, including avoidance of unnecessary or excessive risk taking to support delivery of long-term shareholder value

 

· Shareholder input including “say-on-pay” vote

 

· Advice of independent, outside compensation consultant

 

· General market and peer company pay practices

 

· Current and historical compensation

 

· Performance across key financial metrics, including TSR, compared to U.S. industrial peers and other competitors

 

· General market conditions and the cyclicality of the markets in which we operate

 

  Program Updates

  Implemented at the

  Beginning of 2021

 

 

Timken did not make any adjustments or modifications to the plan designs or financial performance metrics utilized in its executive compensation program in 2021.

 

 

   

  Key 2021

  Compensation

  Decisions and Results

 

  (see page 47 for details)

 

The compensation decisions outlined below demonstrate how the Company aims to maintain alignment with its compensation philosophy and market practice.

 

Base Salary

 

The Committee awarded base salary increases effective in March 2021 to each NEO, including the CEO.

 

 

 

 

  
                               Executive Officer  

    2020 Target    

    Base Salary    

   

    2021 Target    

    Base Salary    

   

    Percent    

    Increase    

    
  Richard G. Kyle   $1,017,640    $1,041,046    2.3%     
  Philip D. Fracassa   $562,380    $575,315    2.3%     
   Christopher A. Coughlin                                            $562,194    $575,125    2.3%     
  Hansal N. Patel   $390,179    $420,223    7.7%     
  Andreas Roellgen*   $360,306    $378,682    5.1%     
  Ronald J. Myers   $408,288    $425,028    4.1%     
 

 

*The conversion rate used for purposes of converting the Euros earned by Mr. Roellgen into U.S. Dollars was 1.00 = $1.1833 (the average monthly exchange rate for the calendar year)

 

  
 

 

Annual Cash Incentive

 

Based on the Company’s 20182021 performance, annual cash incentive awards were paid at 175.5%74.4% of target for the NEOs, reflecting above-targetbelow-target performance for this time period, due to lower than targeted free cash flow and the exercise of negative discretion by the Compensation Committee to alignslightly lower earnings and operating margins.

Annual cash incentive payments for the NEOs with the payoutsopportunities were delivered under the Company’s corporate annual cash incentive plan.shareholder-approved Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan. For additional details, see the “Annual Cash Incentive” section on page 38.47.

Long-Term Incentives

The NEOs received target grants of nonqualified stock options, time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units in 2018,2021, with total grant values ranging from approximately $0.4$0.5 million to $4.2$4.4 million.

Performance-based restricted stock units (which are based on adjusted ROIC and adjusted EPS performance)performance achievements) were earned at 114%92.7% of target for the 2016-20182019-2021 performance period, which reflected recordstrong overall performance in a challenging environment, as the targets were set in early-2019, prior to the start of the 3-yearCOVID-19 cumulativepandemic. We achieved record adjusted EPS during this periodresults in 2019 and improved2021, and strong average adjusted ROIC performance over the 2016-2018 cycle.period.

In February 2020, the Company made a one-time grant of 5,000 deferred shares to Mr. Myers under the Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan to promote the retention of Mr. Myers through the end of 2021. In September 2021, Mr. Myers notified the Company of his intention to retire on November 30, 2021. In connection with his retirement, on October 1, 2021, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved a modification to his award. Under the modification, instead of requiring Mr. Myers to remain employed by the Company until December 31, 2021 in order to earn the deferred shares, the Compensation Committee provided that, as long as Mr. Myers remained employed with the Company until November 30, 2021, then the deferred shares would continue to vest following Mr. Myers’ retirement from the Company as if he remained in continuous employment through December 31, 2021.

 

2019  2022 Program Updates

Modifications to Annual Cash Incentive Metrics
For the 2022 plan year, the Company has decided to replace the adjusted earnings before interest and taxes (“EBIT”) and adjusted EBIT margin metrics within the corporate annual cash incentive plan with adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin, respectively, which aligns with how the Company reports its financial results externally. Consistent with the Company’s prior weighting of adjusted EBIT and adjusted EBIT margin, adjusted EBITDA performance will be weighted 60% and adjusted EBITDA margin performance will be weighted 20% for purposes of determining payouts under the corporate annual cash incentive plan (with free cash flow continuing to have a 20% weighting). These changes will apply to all associates who participate in the corporate annual incentive plan, including the NEOs.
Changes to the Compensation Peer Group Referenced for 2022 Executive Compensation
  

   Replaced working capital metric with a free cash flow metric in theIn 2021, as part of its annual incentive plan.

   Shifted additional weighting from adjusted EPS to adjusted ROIC (following prior increase in adjusted ROIC weighting for 2018) in the long-term incentive plan to further increase emphasis on return on invested capital.

   Modified ourreview of executive and director compensation, peer group for fiscal year 2019 by replacing Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (due to their pending acquisition of General Electric Company’s transportation segment) with Terex Corporation, and Donaldson Company, Inc. with Altra Industrial Motion Corporation (because the Compensation Committee, felt that Altra Industrial Motion Corporation wasin consultation with WTW, conducted a more suitableholistic review of the peer asgroup utilized in 2021 and assessed whether any changes were needed for 2022. As a result of that review, the Company decided to replace eight of its completioncurrent peers with eight new companies. See page 43 for more details regarding the changes to the 2022 peer group and the use of the acquisition of Fortive Corporation’s automationpeer group and specialty business).market data for our 2021 executive compensation program.

 

CEO PayAt-A-Glance

 

 

Target pay for 20182021 for Mr. Kyle was determined by the Compensation Committee after consideration of the factors described below under“Determining Compensation for 2018.2021.The Compensation Committee considered the total compensation package in relation to the target established for the position, taking into account the scope of responsibilities for the particular position. Further details are provided on page 35.44.

  

Elements of our named executive officer compensation consist of base salary, annual cash incentive, long-term incentives that include time-based and performance-based restricted stock units, (time-basedother primarily broad- based employee benefits and performance-based) and stock options, and other employee benefits.limited perquisites.

 

The chart below provides annualized 2018

The chart below provides annualized targeted 2021 compensation levels for Mr. Kyle as compared to the median of our 2021 compensation peer group and general industry survey data. This data represents targeted compensation levels excluding the impact of “all other compensation” and pension value changes, which reflects how the Compensation Committee evaluated Mr. Kyle’s compensation levels when determining 2021 pay. When considering how compensation aligns with external pay data comparisons, we believe it is appropriate to consider total compensation without the impact of all other compensation and pension value changes (particularly as changes in pension value can be heavily impacted by external factors such as interest rates and changes to mortality assumptions and not just changes in the underlying benefit level or program design). The smaller year-over-year increase in actuarial pension values resulted from higher interest rates from the prior year measurement period, offset partially by an update to the marriage assumptions under the Excess Benefit Agreements for the remaining non-retired participants (Mr. Kyle, Mr. Fracassa and Mr. Coughlin) to reflect their current marital statuses. To better align with market practice, effective December 31, 2022, most U.S. participants, including Messrs. Coughlin, Fracassa and Kyle, will cease to accrue pension benefits under the Company’s defined benefit pension plans. See page 52 for more details.

The Company’s Approach to

Rewarding Performance

Annual Cash Incentive

· Reward achievement of short-term individual and corporate performance goals

Time-Based Restricted Stock Units

· Reward long-term shareholder value creation

· Reinforce ownership in the Company

· Support retention of executives

· Align executive compensation with shareholder interests

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

· Reward long-term financial results that drive shareholder value

· Reinforce ownership in the Company

· Align executive compensation with shareholder interests

LOGO

*See page 43 for Mr. Kyle as compared tomore details on the median of our compensationcompanies in the peer group, and general industry survey data. This data represents targeted compensation levelsexcluding the impact of “all other compensation” and pension value changes, which reflects how the Compensation Committee evaluated Mr. Kyle’s compensation levels when determining 2018 pay. When considering how compensation aligns with external benchmarks we believe it is appropriate to consider total compensation withoutthe impact of all other compensation and pension value changes (particularly as changes in pension value can be heavily impacted by external factors such as interest rates and changes to mortality assumptions). In 2018, the Company announced that, effective December 31, 2022, most U.S. participants, including Messrs. Coughlin, Fracassa, Kyle and Myers, will cease to accrue pension benefits under the Company’s defined benefit pension plans. See page 44 for more details.

LOGO

*Peer data consists of U.S. industrial companies with median revenue of $3.1 billion. See page 35 for more details on$3.12 billion (as of the companies intime the peer group. benchmarking study was conducted).

**Survey data consists of pay practices of general industry companies in the WTW Executive Compensation Database adjusted to $3.2$3.8 billion in annual revenue via the use of regression analysis. All Timken long-term incentives (nonqualified stock options, performance-based restricted stock units and time-based restricted stock units) settle in equity to further align our executives’ long-term financial interests with those of our shareholders.    

Aligning Pay with Performance

The Company’s success depends largely on the contributions of motivated, focused and energized employees all working to achieve our strategic and financial objectives. This understanding shapes our approach to providing a competitive compensation and benefits package to our CEO and the other NEOs.

Pay-for-performance is one of the principles that make up our executive compensation philosophy. To help ensure that we are adhering to this principle, we evaluate the degree of alignment of our total incentive compensation to our business results, including the level of adjusted EBIT, adjusted EBIT margin, free cash flow, adjusted ROIC and adjusted EPS, which we believe are key performance metrics that drive long-term TSR and cash generation that supports our capital allocation objectives.

Pay-for-performance is one of the principles that make up our executive compensation philosophy. To ensure that we are adhering to this principle, we evaluate the degree of alignment of our total incentive compensation to our business results, including the level of adjusted EBIT, adjusted EBIT margin, working capital as a percentage of sales, adjusted ROIC and adjusted EPS, which we believe are key performance metrics that drive long-term TSR.

The Company uses a balance of short- and long-term incentives as well as cash andnon-cash compensation to meet these objectives. The elements of executive compensation provided to our NEOs for 2018 consisted of base salary, annual cash incentive, long-term incentives including nonqualified stock options, time-based restricted stock units, performance-based restricted stock units and other employee benefits.

The Company uses a balance of short- and long-term incentives as well as cash and non-cash compensation to meet these objectives. The elements of executive compensation provided to our NEOs for 2021 consisted of base salary, annual cash incentive, long-term incentives including time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units, other primarily broad-based employee benefits, and limited perquisites. Our compensation program is designed to link pay and performance.

The Company’s Approach to Rewarding Performance

Annual Cash Incentive

  Reward achievement of short-term individual and corporate performance goals

Time-Based Restricted Stock Units and Stock Options

  Reward long-term shareholder value creation

  Reinforce ownership in the Company

  Support retention of executives

  Align executive compensation with shareholder interests

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

  Reward long-term financial results that drive shareholder value

  Reinforce ownership in the Company

  Align executive compensation with shareholder interests

 

 · 

Program Design:85% of the targeted total direct compensation for Mr. Kyle and between 62%64% and 76% of the targeted total direct compensation for the other NEOs is comprised of incentive-based pay.pay:

 

LOGO

LOGOLOGO

 

 · 

Performance Assessment:Our Compensation Committee uses a comprehensive process to assess Company performance. We believe our plan and financial metrics focus management on the appropriate objectives for the creation of both short- and long-term shareholder value.

The Company’s incentive compensation program for executives is designed to link compensation with key financial and operating goals, some of which are short term,short-term, while others take several years or more to achieve.

    

Short-Term

(Cash)

Annual

Incentive*

Long-Term

(Equity)

Performance-Based

Restricted Stock Units*

60% of NEO Annual Equity
Grants

  

Long-Term

(Equity)

 

Performance-

BasedTime-Based Restricted

Stock Units*

UnitsLong-Term

 

(Equity)

40% of NEO Annual Equity

Time-Based
Restricted Stock
UnitsGrants

Long-Term

(Equity)

Nonqualified

Stock Options

Objective

Short-term operational

business priorities and shareholder value creation

Long-term strategic

financial goals and shareholder value creation

Long-term shareholder

value creation

Long-term shareholder

value creation

Objective

Short-term operational business priorities and shareholder value creationLong-term strategic financial goals and shareholder value creationLong-term shareholder value creation

Time Horizon

and 2018 2021

Metrics

  

One year

 

60% adjusted EBITEBIT**

 

20% adjusted EBIT margin

margin**

 

20% working capital as a percentage of sales

free cash flow

  

Three years

 

70%60% adjusted EPS

 

30%40% adjusted ROIC

  Four-year vesting period (1/4(25% per year)

Four-year vesting period (1/4 per year) and10-year exercise period

 

*See “Annual Cash Incentive” and Long-Term Incentives: Performance BasedPerformance-Based Restricted Stock UnitsUnits” sections on pages 3847 and 4250, respectively, for more details.

**Will be replaced with adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin for the 2022 plan year.

Other key features of our executive compensation program include:

 

Stock ownership requirements: Our stock ownership guidelines require all senior executives to meet specific ownership targets based on position. This requirement aligns the interests of our executives to those of our shareholders. See page 47 for more information.

Stock ownership requirements: Our stock ownership guidelines require all senior executives to meet specific ownership targets based on position. This requirement aligns the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. See page 55 for more information.

 

Clawback provisions: The Company maintains specific provisions regarding the recovery (“clawback”) of awards to deter certain types of conduct, including conduct that could affect the accuracy of the Company’s financial statements. See page 47 for more information.

Clawback provisions: The Company maintains specific provisions regarding the recovery (“clawback”) of awards to deter certain types of conduct, including conduct that could affect the accuracy of the Company’s financial statements. See page 56 for more information.

Consideration of 20182021 Say-on-Pay Vote

 

In evaluating the design of our executive compensation programs and the specific compensation decisions for each of our NEOs, the Compensation Committee considers shareholder input, including the advisory“say-on-pay” vote at our annual meeting, in addition to other factors. In 2018, approximately2021, over 97% of the votes cast approved the compensation for our NEOs described in our Proxy Statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. From time to time, our shareholders have also engaged in discussions with the Company regarding elements of our compensation program and their feedback has generally been considered in making compensation decisions. Based on thisthe strong level of shareholder support, the Compensation Committee did not make any changes to our compensation programs or policies that were specifically driven by the results of thesay-on-pay vote.

vote or shareholder feedback.

Use of Peer Group and Market Data for Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program

The Company establishes target compensation levels that are consistent with market practice and internal equity considerations relative to base salaries, annual cash incentive awards and long-term incentive grants, as well as with the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the appropriate pay element mix for the position.

In order to gauge the competitiveness of its compensation programs, the Company reviewed compensation practices and pay opportunities from general industry survey data, as well as from a selection of publicly traded peer companies. The Company attempts to position itself to attract and retain qualified senior executives in the face of competitive pressures in its relevant labor markets.

Specifically, in 2018, the Company used information regarding the pay practices of general industry companies in the WTW Executive Compensation Database, regressed to $3.2 billion in annual revenue.Use of Peer Group and Market Data

The Company establishes compensation levels that are consistent with market practice and general internal equity considerations relative to base salaries, target annual cash incentive awards and long-term incentive grants, as well as with the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the appropriate pay element mix for the position.

In order to gauge the competitiveness of its compensation programs, the Company reviewed compensation practices and pay opportunities from general industry survey data, as well as from a selection of publicly traded peer companies. The Company attempts to position itself to attract and retain qualified senior executives in the face of competitive pressures in its relevant labor markets.

Specifically, in 2021, the Company used information regarding the pay practices of general industry companies in the WTW Executive Compensation Database, regressed to $3.8 billion in annual revenue, which was slightly below our expectations for 2021 revenue at the beginning of 2021, but aligned to our expectations for 2020 revenue, prior to the global outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. When running this regression analysis, the Company maintained the revenue figure at $3.8 billion due in part to continued uncertainty relating to the pandemic as well as supply chain challenges. The Company believes that revenue and operational footprint are appropriate indicators of the size and complexity of an organization, which should be reflected in determining compensation levels. The compensation data resulting from this analysis was a significant factor considered by the Compensation Committee with respect to its 2021 executive compensation decisions for our NEOs.

The Company also used a compensation peer group as an additional reference point when determining executive compensation. The 2021 peer group (used to set compensation levels for 2021), which is unchanged from our 2020 peer group, consisted of a select group of U.S. industrial companies that our Compensation Committee believed to be reflected in determining compensation levels. The compensation data resulting from this analysis was a significant factor considered by the Compensation Committee with respect to its 2018 executive compensation decisions for our NEOs.

The Company also used a compensation peer group as an additional reference point when determining executive compensation. The 2018 peer group consisted of a select group of similarly sized U.S. industrial companies that our Compensation Committee believes are representative of the talent market in which we compete and consisted of the following companies:

 

Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

  Donaldson Company,Dana Inc.*  Nordson CorporationCorp.

Altra Industrial Motion Corp.

Flowserve Corp.Regal Beloit Corp.*

American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.

Flowserve CorporationRegal Beloit Corporation
Carlisle Companies Incorporated

  IDEX CorporationCorp.  Rexnord CorporationCorp.*
Colfax Corporation

Carlisle Companies Inc.

  ITT Inc.Terex Corp.

Colfax Corp.

Kennametal Inc.  Trinity Industries, Inc.

Crane Co.

  KennametalMeritor, Inc.  Triumph Group, Inc.

* As named prior to the Regal Beloit Corp. and Rexnord Process and Motion Control transaction.

While the Compensation Committee considered general industry and peer group data in determining the general competitiveness of executive compensation, market data is only one factor taken into consideration when determining the total compensation for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee also considered other factors listed in “Factors Guiding Our Decisions” on page 38.

Changes to the Compensation Peer Group Referenced for 2022 Executive Compensation

In 2021, as part of its annual review of executive and director compensation, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with WTW, reviewed the peer group utilized in 2021 and assessed whether any adjustments were needed to the peer group referenced for setting compensation levels in 2022. Factors taken into consideration when setting the 2022 compensation peer group included comparisons of various financial metrics, such as revenue and market capitalization, operational footprint, relevant end-user markets, and product portfolio of added companies compared to Timken’s current product portfolio. To account for the Company’s increased revenue and market capitalization compared to the median revenue size and median market capitalization of our current peer group, we made the following changes:

2021 Peer Group
  
Dana IncorporatedRemoved  Meritor, Inc.Remaining for 2022    Added

Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

American Axle & Manufacturing

Holdings, Inc.

Colfax Corp.

IDEX Corp.

Nordson Corp.

Rexnord Corp.*

Trinity Industries, Inc.

Triumph Group, Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Corp.

Carlisle Companies Inc.

Crane Co.

Dana Inc.

Flowserve Corp.

ITT Inc.

Kennametal Inc.

Meritor, Inc.

Regal Rexnord Corp.

Terex Corp.

Agco Corp.

Dover Corp.

Fortive Corp.

Gates Industrial Corporation plc

Ingersoll Rand Inc.

Oshkosh Corp.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation*Corp.

Woodward, Inc.

While the Compensation Committee considered peer group data in determining the general competitiveness of executive compensation, it is only one factor taken into consideration when determining the total compensation for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee also considered other factors listed in “Factors Guiding Our Decisions” on page 30.

*For fiscal 2019, we replaced Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (due to their pending acquisition of General Electric Company’s transportation segment) with Terex Corporation, and Donaldson Company, Inc. with Altra Industrial Motion Corporation (because the Compensation Committee felt that Altra Industrial Motion Corporation was a more suitable peer as a result of its completion of the acquisition of Fortive Corporation’s automation and specialty business).

2022 Peer Group

* As named prior to the Regal Beloit Corp. and Rexnord Process and Motion Control transaction.

Determining Compensation for 20182021

 

Role of the Compensation Committee

Each year, the Compensation Committee determines the appropriate level of compensation for our NEOs. As part of this process, the Compensation Committee reviews all of the components of compensation for the NEOs and determines if each individual’s total compensation is reasonable and consistent with the Company’s compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee reviews each component of compensation individually and in total, references competitive market data (25th to 75th percentile) for each individual element, as well as total direct compensationincluding at the 50th percentile, and, after consideration of additional factors (e.g,.(for example, the executive’s responsibilities, experience level, tenure, performance in the position and Company performance, including TSR), may make adjustments to any element of an executive’sa NEO’s compensation in establishing such executive’s total direct compensation.

The Compensation Committee then approves, with any modifications it deems appropriate, base salary ranges, target annual cash incentive award opportunities and long-term incentive grants for the Company’s NEOs.

In the course of this analysis and development of proposed total compensation packages, WTW, the Compensation Committee’s external compensation consultant, reviews the relevant information and discusses its findings with the Compensation Committee.

The compensation package for the CEO is determined by the Compensation Committee and approved by the independent Directors of the Board during executive session.

Role of the CEO and Management

The CEO, in consultation with executive compensation leadership and WTW, prepares compensation recommendations for the NEOs (other than the CEO) and presents these recommendations to the Compensation Committee. These recommendations are based on the CEO’s personal review of each

NEO’s performance, general internal equity considerations, job responsibilities and importance to our overall business strategy, as well as our compensation philosophy. Although these recommendations are given significant weight, the Compensation Committee retains full discretion when determining compensation for the NEOs.

As part of this process, individual elements of compensation provided to our NEOs are generally compared to general industry market data and peer group data as described above and the total compensation package is considered in relation to the target established for the position, taking into account the scope of responsibilities for the particular position. Total direct compensation (base salary, annual cash incentive and long-term incentive grants) also is evaluated in relation to the total compensation for positions with similar levels of responsibility derived from the general industry market data and peer group data.data described above.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

To add rigor in the review process and to inform the Compensation Committee of market trends, the Compensation Committee engages the services of WTW anas our independent executive compensation consultant to analyze our executive compensation structure and plan designs, and to assess whether the compensation program is competitive and supports the Compensation Committee’s goal to align the interests of executive officers with those of shareholders. WTW also provides the Compensation Committee with market data, which the Compensation Committee generally references as a market check when determining compensation for non-employee Directors and executive officers.

In 2018,For purposes of 2021 compensation decisions, WTW’s primary areas of assistance to the Compensation Committee were:

 

 · 

Gathering information related to current trends and practices in executive compensation in response to questions raised by the Compensation Committee and management;

 

 ·

Developing analyses that help evaluate and inform on how the compensation programs are working, including pay-for-performance analyses, peer group reviews and risk assessments;

· 

Reviewing information developed by management for the Compensation Committee and providing its input on such information to the Compensation Committee;

 

 · 

Attending and participating in meetings with the Compensation Committee, as well as briefings with the Compensation Committee chairpersonChair and management prior to meetings; and

 

 · 

Reviewing with management and the Compensation Committee materials to be used in preparing the Company’s Proxy Statement.

The Compensation Committee has authorized WTW to interact with the Company’s management, as needed, on behalf of the Compensation Committee with respect to executive compensation matters. WTW also provides actuarial, pension administration and other services to the Company, which are unrelated to the work that WTW provides to the Compensation Committee. The WTW consultants who advise the Compensation Committee are different from the WTW employees who perform work for the Company in other areas. In order to maintain independence, WTW has adopted internal safeguardsformal executive compensation consulting protocols that help to ensure that its executive compensation unit, which provides supportadvice to the Compensation Committee is maintained separatelyfully objective and independent and that the business unit providing such advice remains separate from itsWTW’s other business units that provide advice to the Company’s management. For more information regarding fees paid to WTW by the Company in 20182021 and the Compensation Committee’s assessment that there is no conflict of interest in the work performed by WTW with respect to executive compensation, see page 1923 of the Proxy Statement.

Key Elements of the Executive Compensation Program

 

 

Type of Compensation

  

Link to Program Objectives

  

Type of
Compensation

Key Features

Cash Compensation

Base Salary

  A standard compensation element in executive compensation packages, offering market competitivemarket-competitive fixed compensation to attract and retain talent.talent  Cash

Provides a consistent source of income.

income

Annual Cash Incentive

  A cash-based award that encourages executives to focus on achievement of specific annual corporate performance goals.Cashgoals  Target incentive opportunity is set as a percentage of base salary, and award isawards are paid out only if thresholdbased on achievement relative to annual performance levels are met.metrics and targets

Long-Term Equity Incentives

Long-Term Incentive:Nonqualified Stock Options

Helps ensure that executive pay is directly linked to stock price appreciation and promotes retention.

Long-Term

Equity

Four-year vesting and10-year exercise period; NEOs holding nonqualified stock options will only receive value if the stock price rises.

Long-Term Incentive:Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

  Requires achievement of specified strategic financial and operating metrics over a three-year period that the Compensation Committee believes are highly correlated to driving long-term shareholder value. Itvalue; it also further aligns the long-term financial interests of our executives with those of our shareholders.Long-Term Equityshareholders  Designed to reward executives for attainment of specified3-year three-year corporate performance goals; value is delivered in equity to align with shareholder experience. Cumulativeexperience; cumulative dividend equivalents are paid in cash based on the actual number of shares delivered at the end of the three-year performance cycle.cycle

Long-Term Incentive:Time-BasedTime Based Restricted Stock Units

  Rewards long-term shareholder value creation, enhances executive stock ownership and promotes retention.Long-Term Equityretention  Four-year (25% per year) time vesting; value is delivered in equity to align with shareholder experience. Cumulativeexperience; cumulative dividend equivalents are paid in cash upon vesting.vesting
Benefits

Retirement and Savings Benefits

  An element of our benefits program that helps attract and retain executive talent.Benefittalent  

NEOs receive retirement and savings benefits through several plans:

·   Qualified and nonqualified defined contribution plans*; ·

·   Qualified and nonqualified defined benefit plans*; and

·   Deferred compensation plan

Severance and Change in Control Agreements

  Helps ensure NEOs remain focused on creating sustainable performance  

Agreements help protect the Company and the NEOs from risks by providing: ·

·   Deferred compensation plan.Economic stability;

*See“Retirement Programs” on page 44 for NEO eligibility·   Death or disability payments; and

·   Payments and benefits in the event of a qualifying termination of employment, including in connection with a change in control

Other Benefits

  Keeps program competitive and provides health, disability and life insurance protection for executives.Benefitexecutives  Perquisites are limited in amount and use.

Severance and Change in Control Agreements

Helps ensure NEOs remain focused on creating sustainable performance.Benefit

Agreements help protect the Company and the NEOs from risks by providing:

   Economic stability;

   Death or disability payments; and

   Payments and benefits in the event of a qualifying termination of employment, including in connection with a change in control.

use

*See “Retirement Programs” on page 52 for NEO eligibility.

Analysis of 20182021 Compensation

 

Base Salary

 

Base salaries for the NEOs are intended to reflect the scope of their responsibilities, the length of their experience performing those responsibilities and their performance. The Compensation Committee initially determines base salary ranges for executive officersthe NEOs based on external general market and peer group data for salary practices for positions with similar levels of responsibility. The Compensation Committee also reviews base salaries for the NEOs annually in light of each officer’s experience, leadership, current salary and position in the salary range. The base salary decisions described below were made based on these considerations.

  
  

 

Establishing Base Salaries

 

When establishing base salaries for

NEOs, the Compensation

Committee considers general

industry data for comparable roles

and peer group data as a general guideline.

20182021 Base Salary Decisions

 

 · 

CEO: Mr. Kyle received aThe Committee awarded base salary increase of 5.6%increases effective in March 2018. His last2021 to each NEO, including the CEO.

·

The percentage increases shown below are in comparison to the base salaries approved in March 2020 for the CEO and other NEOs, and do not reflect the temporary salary increase priorreductions in 2020 taken in response to this was in Maythe significant unforeseen impact of 2014.COVID-19.

 

Other NEOs: Mr. Fracassa received a base salary increase of 5% in March 2018. Ms. Cheverine, Mr. Coughlin and Mr. Myers received base salary increases of 3% in March 2018.

Executive Officer  

2020 Target   

Base Salary   

   

2021 Target   

Base Salary   

   

Percent  

Increase  

 

  Richard G. Kyle

   $1,017,640    $1,041,046    2.3% 

  Philip D. Fracassa

   $562,380    $575,315    2.3% 

  Christopher A. Coughlin

   $562,194    $575,125    2.3% 

  Hansal N. Patel

   $390,179    $420,223    7.7% 

  Andreas Roellgen*

   $360,306    $378,682    5.1% 

  Ronald J. Myers

   $408,288    $425,028    4.1% 

*The conversion rate used for purposes of converting the Euros earned by Mr. Roellgen into U.S. Dollars was 1.00 = $1.1833 (the average monthly exchange rate for the calendar year)

 

Annual Cash Incentive

 

The Company’s annual cash incentive program provides the NEOs with the opportunity to earn additional compensation based on the achievement of annual corporate performance goals established by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board. It is intended to focus the NEOs on specific performance goals in the applicable year. For all NEOs, the 20182021 annual cash incentive opportunity was delivered through the Senior Executive Management Performance Plan (the “SEMPP”).shareholder-approved Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan.

  

 

Linking Compensation to Performance

 

The Compensation Committee established
adjusted EBIT as the primary performance
measure because it believes this measure
is closely correlated with the creation of
shareholder value.

 

In 2021, Mr. Kyle, as CEO, had an annual cash target award opportunity of 125% of base salary and the other NEOs had target award opportunities ranging from 55% to 80% of base salary. Annual cash incentive payouts for our NEOs were determined by:

·

Corporate performance (measured by adjusted EBIT, adjusted EBIT margin and free cash flow3); and

·

Individual performance (however, for 2021, annual cash incentive payments were not adjusted as a result of individual performance for any of the NEOs).

Specific factors that go into setting the targets include consideration of Company results for prior years, our SEMPP permitted us to grant awards that could qualifyresults for U.S. industrial peers, current market conditions, cyclicality and outlook, acquisitions, divestitures, working capital requirements, past targets and performance against those targets, and macro-economic factors.

Performance goals for the “qualified performance-based compensation” exemption under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). However, as a result of U.S. federal tax reform legislation adopted in late 2017 (“U.S. Tax Reform”), that exemption is no longer available for SEMPP awards (beginning with award opportunities granted for 2018). At this time, the Company plans to continue to utilize the shareholder-approved SEMPP to deliver theCompany’s corporate annual cash incentive opportunitiesplan were set near the beginning of 2021. The 2021 adjusted EBIT target represents a 15% increase over actual 2020 adjusted EBIT results (using comparable exclusions) and approximately 5% lower than the 2020 adjusted EBIT target which was not achieved due to NEOs for the 2019 plan year.impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In 2018, the Company used adjusted EBIT,The 2021 adjusted EBIT margin target of 14.4% was set at a level that was 30 basis points higher than the 2020 actual adjusted EBIT margin results of 14.1% and 80 basis points lower than the 2020 adjusted EBIT margin target of 15.2% which was not achieved due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The 2021 free cash flow target of $415 million was set equal to the 2020 free cash flow target and 10% lower than 2020 free cash flow results as the Company expected higher working capital investment to support anticipated sales growth. This turned out to be the case and was compounded by higher operating costs associated with the impact from COVID-19,as free cash flow of $230 million in 2021 resulted in a percentage0% payout under the corporate annual cash incentive plan.

2021 Annual Performance Award Decisions

Under the corporate annual cash incentive plan, actual performance under each of sales (basedthe three financial metrics needed to reach the respective minimum threshold for that portion of the award to be payable. Performance targets and actual performance levels for the 2021 corporate annual cash incentive plan are shown in the table below. Straight-line interpolation is used to calculate actual payouts under the plan.

Corporate Annual Cash Incentive Plan

    Threshold  Target  Maximum  Actual

  Adjusted EBIT (60% weighting)

  $399M  $570M  $741M  

$552M

(94.7% payout)

  Adjusted EBIT Margin* (20% weighting)

  10.0%  14.4%  16.5%  

13.4%

(88.1% payout)

  Free Cash Flow (20% weighting)

  $249M  $415M  $581M  

$239M

(0.0% payout)

  Plan Payout

  é

50%

  é

100%

  é

200%

  

é

74.4% payout

*Adjusted EBIT Margin less than 8.5% would have resulted in zero payout for the plan. Between 8.5% and 10.0%, a payout under the Adjusted EBIT metric and/or Free Cash Flow metric would have been possible.

3 Based on adjusted earnings used for external reporting, further adjusted to exclude post-closing operating results of acquisitions)acquisitions. Free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by operating activities minus capital expenditures. See Appendix A for reconciliations of adjusted earnings and free cash flow as used for external reporting to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

Actual performance for adjusted EBIT, adjusted EBIT margin, and free cash flow caused the performance measures for funding the SEMPP. Mr. Kyle, as CEO, had a target award opportunity of 120% of base salary and the other NEOs had target award opportunities ranging from 55% to 75% of base salary in 2018.

Setting Targets and Aligning the Executive Annual Cash Incentive Plan with the Corporate Annual Cash Incentive Plan

Like other eligible corporate Company employees, our NEOs have the opportunity to receive an annual cash incentive award for meeting or exceeding a series of individual and collective performance targets over the course of the year. While the SEMPP is the plan the NEOs participate in, the payouts from this plan take into account payouts associated with the Company’s corporate annual cash incentive plan that covers other eligible corporate employees generally. Annual cash incentive payouts are determined by:

   Corporate performance (measured by adjusted EBIT, adjusted EBIT margin and working capital as a percentage of sales); and

   Individual performance.

Specific factors that go into setting the targets include consideration of prior-year results for the Company as compared to results for global bearing companies and U.S. industrial peers, current market conditions, cyclicality and outlook, acquisitions, divestitures, past targets and performance against those targets, and macro-economic factors such as currency rates.

Performance goals for the Company’s corporate annual cash incentive plan were set near the beginning of 2018. The 2018 adjusted EBIT target was set approximately 27% higher than the 2017 adjusted EBIT target, and represents a 14% increase over actual 2017 adjusted EBIT results (using comparable exclusions).

The 2018 target for working capital as a percentage of sales of 27.8% was made more challenging to achieve (because it required a 120 basis point improvement to obtain a target payout for this financial metric) than the 2017 target for working capital as a percentage of sales of 29.0%, and represents a 30 basis point improvement over actual 2017 working capital as a percentage of sales of 28.1%.

The 2018 adjusted EBIT margin target (which was newly added for 2018) of 11.5% was set at a level that was 70 basis points higher than 2017 actual adjusted EBIT margin results of 10.8%.

In addition to the performance measures used in the SEMPP, performance against the corporate annual cash incentive plan goals is a factor the Compensation Committee considers when determining an NEO’s annual cash incentive payout. A summary of performance and calculated payouts for 2018 annual cash incentives are shown in the section below.

2018 Annual Performance Award Decisions

Under the SEMPP, actual performance under the three financial metrics must reach the respective minimum threshold for that portion of the SEMPP award to be funded. Performance targets and actual performance levels for the 2018 SEMPP and2021 corporate annual cash incentive plan are shown in the tables below. Straight-line interpolation is used to calculate actual payouts under the plan.

SEMPP

   

 

Threshold

 

 

 

Target

 

 

 

Maximum

 

 

 

Actual

 

  Adjusted EBIT* (60% weighting)

  $215M $358M $466M $488M
(260% funding)

  Adjusted EBIT Margin (20% weighting)

  9.5% 11.5% 13.0% 14.0%

(260% funding)

  Working Capital as a % of Sales (20% weighting)

  32.5% 27.8% 24.0% 29.9%
(129.8% funding)
  LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO

Plan Funding

 

  80%

 

 170%

 

 260%

 

 234% funding

 

Corporate Annual Cash Incentive Plan

   Threshold

 

 Target

 

 Maximum

 

  

 

Actual

 

 

 

  Adjusted EBIT* (60% weighting)

  $251M $358M $466M  
$488M
(200% payout)
 
 

  Adjusted EBIT Margin (20% weighting)

  9.5% 11.5% 13.0%  

14.0%

(200% payout)

 

 

  Working Capital as a % of Sales (20% weighting)

  32.5% 27.8% 24.0%  

29.9%

(77% payout)

 

 

  LOGO LOGO LOGO  LOGO 

  Plan Payout

  50% 100%

 

 200%

 

  

 

175.5% payout

 

 

 

*Adjusted EBIT less than $215M would have resulted in zero payout for the plan. Between $215M and $251M, a payout under the Adjusted EBIT Margin metric and/or Working Capital as a % of Sales metric would have been possible. The Adjusted EBIT target was modified slightly due to the divestment of Groeneveld Information Technology Holding B.V., anon-core telematics business that had sales of approximately $15 million for the twelve months ended September 30, 2018.

Because actual performance for both adjusted EBIT and adjusted EBIT margin were above target, the 2018 SEMPP was eligible to fundbe scored at 234% of target. However, the calculated award for the 2018 corporate annual cash incentive plan was 175.5%74.4% for corporate participants. Accordingly, the 2018participants, resulting in a 2021 cash award payout equaled 175.5%of 74.4% of the target opportunity for Mr.Messrs. Kyle, Fracassa, Coughlin, Myers, Patel and the other NEOs, reflecting the Compensation Committee’s use of negative discretion to reduce payouts from the SEMPP to be in line with the corporate plan (reflected in the chart above).Roellgen. While payouts to other non-NEO participants in the corporate plan are subject to certain multipliers based upon individual performance, seniority and employment grade, no similarsuch multipliers were applied to the 20182021 cash award payouts for the NEOs. Mr. Myers’ award payout was prorated based on the number of months worked during the year, prior to his retirement on November 30, 2021. The SEMPPcorporate annual cash incentive plan metrics were chosen to drive short-term operational business priorities that the Compensation Committee believes will help drivedeliver shareholder value over time. The targets for the SEMPPcorporate plan for 20182021 were established at more challenging levels than 2017when compared with 2020 results and the payouts are a reflection of very strong results for 2018 as2021, relative to the Company achieved record adjusted EPSinflationary environment and significantly increased revenue, net income, adjusted ROIC, adjusted EBIT and adjusted EBIT margin from the prior year.global supply chain challenges.

Long-Term Incentives

The Compensation Committee administers the Long-TermEquity and Incentive Plan, which was approved by our shareholders.Compensation Plan. Awards under the Long-TermEquity and Incentive Compensation Plan can be made in the form of common shares, nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares,

performance units, restricted shares, restricted stock units, deferred shares and dividend equivalents. All long-term incentives settle in equity to further align our executives’ long-term financial interests with those of our shareholders. In 2018,2021, the Company granted to the NEOs:NEOs under the Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan:

 

 

Nonqualified stock options that vest 25% per year over four years with a10-year exercise period and are intended to provide value to the holder only to the extent that the share price rises above the market price of the common shares at the time the option is granted;

· 

Performance-based restricted stock units that are earned based on the achievement of objective performance metrics measured over a three-year period of strategic, financial and operating metrics and are intended to further align the long-term financial interests of our executives with those of our shareholders and link compensation to building long-term shareholder value; and

 

 · 

Time-based restricted stock units that vest 25% per year over four years and provide strong alignment between the interests of Company executives and shareholders.

The value of each type of long-term incentive grant is linked directly to the performance of the Company or the price of its common shares. In the case of stock options, the recipient recognizes value only to the extent that the share price on the exercise date exceeds the grant date exercise price. For performance-based restricted stock units, the value of the grant is tied to both the Company’s share price and the achievement of financial and operating metrics, while the value of time-based restricted stock units is directly linked to the Company’s share price.

In each case described above, an executive generally must remain employed by the Company for a specified period of time to earn the full value of an award, which aids the Company in retaining executives. In total, the Company believes that these grants provide a balanced focus on shareholder value creation and retention of key managers over the course of a full business cycle. These grants also serve to balance the short-term operating focus of the Company and align the long-term financial interests of executive management with those of our shareholders.

The size of the long-term incentive grants and the allocation of grant value among the long-term incentive grant types are based on a combination of an analysis of market practice and the relative importance of the objectives behind each of the grants.

In February 2020, the Company made a one-time grant of 5,000 deferred shares to Mr. Myers under the Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan to promote the retention of Mr. Myers through the end of 2021. In September 2021, Mr. Myers notified the Company of his intention to retire on November 30, 2021. In connection with his retirement, on October 1, 2021, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved a modification to his award. Under the modification, instead of requiring Mr. Myers to remain employed by the Company until December 31, 2021 in order to earn the deferred shares, the Compensation Committee provided that, as long as Mr. Myers remained employed with the Company until November 30, 2021, then the deferred shares would continue to vest following Mr. Myers’ retirement from the Company as if he remained in continuous employment through December 31, 2021. Upon his retirement, Mr. Myers’ remaining unvested equity holdings were treated in accordance with the original terms of the respective grants. For additional details

regarding the treatment of unvested equity holdings upon an NEO’s retirement, see the “2018Retirement” section on page 68.

2021 Long-Term Incentive Decisions

 

For the annual grants made in February 2018,2021, the target value to be delivered in nonqualified stock options, performance-based restricted stock units and time-based restricted stock units was 400%425% of the base salary midpoint for Mr. Kyle, and between 110%115% and 215%220% of the base salary midpoint for the other NEOs. The allocation percentage between the threetwo types of equity for NEOs receiving the annual grant was 30% nonqualified stock options, 50%60% performance-based restricted stock units and 20%40% time-based restricted stock units.

 

 

Driving Shareholder Return

 

Long-term incentive grants are intended to balance short-term operating objectives of the Company with long-term objectives by aligningand align the financial interests of our executives with those of our shareholders.

In determining the number of shares or options granted in 2018,2021, the target value for each grant was converted to a number of shares or options, respectively, based on the opening share price on the day of the grant.

TheFor 2021, the Compensation Committee typically makesmade long-term incentive grants at the first regularly scheduled meeting of each year when the Compensation Committee determinesdetermined all elements of the NEOs’ compensation for the year and did so in 2018.

Stock Options

In 2018, our key employees (including the NEOs) received nonqualified stock options that:

Have an exercise price equal to the opening share price on the date of grant;

Will vest over a four-year period in equal amounts each year; and

Will expire ten years after the date of grant.

The Compensation Committee believes that these awards help the Company retain executives and focus attention on longer-term performance. Stock options are an effective retention and motivational tool because they only have value if the share price grows over the term of the award, and then only to the extent the share price on the exercise date exceeds the grant date exercise price. For information about the specific number of stock options awarded in 2018 to each NEO, see the“2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards”table on page 51.

Under accounting rules, nonqualified stock options are expensed over the vesting period using the Black-Scholes value on the date of grant.    year.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

To further align the long-term interests of executive leadership with those of our shareholders, and to provide an incentive to achieve long-term financial and operating objectives, the Compensation Committee granted performance-based restricted stock units to key employees (including the NEOs) that vest based on the achievement of specified performance objectives. Performance-based restricted stock units also serve to both reward and retain executives, as the receipt of a payout is linked to performance and the value of the payout is linked to the share price when the shares vest. Cumulative dividend equivalents are paid in cash based on the actual number of shares delivered at the end of the performance cycle.

2018-20202021-2023 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Cycle

The performance metrics for performance-based restricted stock units granted in 20182021 were cumulative adjusted EPS and adjusted ROIC for a three-year performance period (2018-2020)(2021-2023). The Compensation Committee selected these metrics because it believed they are highly correlated to driving long-term shareholder value and key elements to achievement of the Company’s business strategy. Actual performance for adjusted EPS and adjusted ROIC is calculated based on fully adjusted earnings as used for external reporting in 2021 (net of taxes)4, with adjustmentsthe ability to exclude the effect of material changes in accounting principles, methods, and/or methodssignificant changes in tax law that are not reflected in the plan. For the 2018-20202021-2023 performance-based restricted stock unit cycle, the adjusted EPS target reflected an 8%a 7% compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) over actual 20172020 adjusted EPS (using comparable exclusions)adjustments), resulting in the cumulative adjusted EPS target for the 2018-20202021-2023 performance-based restricted stock unit cycle being set approximately 45%10% higher than the actual cumulative adjusted EPS results for the 2015-20172018-2020 cycle, which was the most recently completed cycle at the time the 2018-20202021-2023 target was established.established and was also record three-year performance at that time. The 8%7% targeted CAGR over 20172020 actual adjusted EPS results was set at a level that required meaningful improvement over the cycle. The three-year target for adjusted ROIC was set equal to the actual average adjusted ROIC for the 2018-2020 cycle and 160 basis points higher than 2020 actual adjusted ROIC. The factors that go into setting the target include consideration of prior-year results for the Company as compared to results for U.S. industrial peers, current market conditions, cyclicality and outlook, acquisitions, divestitures, past targets and performance against those targets and other factors. The three-year target for adjusted ROIC reflected a 70 basis point improvement over actual 2017 adjusted ROIC and a 110 basis point improvement over actual adjusted ROIC for the 2015-2017 cycle. The Company’s performance targets for the performance-based restricted stock units granted in 20182021 are shown in the table below.

4 See Appendix A for reconciliations of adjusted EPS and adjusted ROIC as used for external reporting to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

Straight-line interpolation is used to calculate payouts for these performance-based restricted stock units.

2018-20202021-2023 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Cycle: Metrics and Weightings

 

           Threshold                  Target                  Maximum        

  Three-Year Cumulative Adjusted

  EPS (70% weighting)

  $5.53  $9.22  $11.99
  Adjusted ROIC* (30% weighting)  8.0%  10.5%  12.5%
  LOGO  LOGO  LOGO
  Plan Funding  50%  100%  200%
    Threshold    Target    Maximum

  Three-Year Cumulative Adjusted

  EPS (60% weighting)

  $9.92    $14.17    $18.42

  Adjusted ROIC* (40% weighting)

  8.5%

é

    11.5%

é

    

14.0%

é

  Plan Funding

  50%    100%    200%

*Adjusted ROIC less than 5%7.5% will result in zero payout for the cycle. Between adjusted ROIC of 5%7.5% to 8%8.5%, a payout under the Three-Year Cumulative Adjusted EPS metric is possible.

For information about the specific performance-based restricted stock units awarded to the NEOs in 2018,2021, see the20182021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards”tableontableon page 51.61.

Results for the 2016-20182019-2021 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Cycle

In 2016,2019, the NEOs other than Ms. Cheverine (who was hired after the 2016 performance-based restricted stock units were granted), received awards of performance-based restricted stock units to cover a three-year performance period (2016-2018)(2019-2021).

The performance metrics for performance-based restricted stock units granted in 20162019 were cumulative adjusted EPS and adjusted ROIC for the three-year performance period. The Compensation Committee selected these metrics because it believed they are highly correlated to driving long-term shareholder value and key elements to achievement of the Company’s business strategy. Actual performance for adjusted EPS and adjusted ROIC is calculated based on fully adjusted EPS as used for external reporting5, with adjustmentsthe ability to exclude the effect of changes in tax law, accounting principles or methods or other laws that are not reflected in the plan. The adoption ofmark-to-market accounting forNo such exclusions were applied to the remeasurement of pension and other post-retirement assets and obligations in 2017 and the benefits from U.S. Tax Reform (effective as of 2018) were deemed to be material changes in accounting methods and tax laws that were not originally contemplated by the Compensation Committee when the performance metrics for the 2016-20182019-2021 performance-based restricted stock unit cycle, were established. Combined, these two items improved actual cumulativeand fully adjusted EPS results over the3-year cycle by approximately $0.54 and actual adjusted ROIC results by 100 basis points. As a result,as used for external reporting were used to determine actual performance for the Compensation Committee eliminated the impact from these two unplanned items, which reduced the payout.applicable compensation adjusted metrics.

The Compensation Committee believed that the targets for the performance-based restricted stock units granted in 20162019 were appropriately challenging but achievable.and that achievement would be supportive of shareholder value creation. The adjusted EPS target for the 2016-20182019-2021 performance-based restricted stock unit cycle reflected an 8%a 6% CAGR over actual 20152018 adjusted EPS results and was also set approximately 22%which were 71% higher than the actual cumulative adjusted EPS results for the 2015-2017most recently completed cycle. The adjusted ROIC target for the 2016-20182019-2021 cycle was set 50100 basis points higher than the 2018-2020 adjusted ROIC target and 30 basis points lower than the actual 20152018-2020 average adjusted ROIC of 10.5%11.8%.

OverIn terms of actual results for the 2016-2018 cycle, adjusted EPS increased approximately 10% year-over-year in 2019, decreased approximately 12%11% year-over-year in 2016, increased approximately 25% year-over-year in 20172020, due to the negative impact from the COVID-19 pandemic, and increased approximately 58%15% year-over-year in 2018.2021. As a result, the performance-based restricted stock units were earned at 114%, or slightly above target92.7% reflecting the difficulty of the targets set for the 2016-2018 cycle.cycle as we achieved record three-year cumulative adjusted EPS over the period, including record adjusted EPS results in 2019 and 2021, and strong average ROIC performance. Moreover, as detailed on page 2837 in the “20182021 Performance” section, the Company’s3-year three-year TSR exceeded bothoutpaced the median of its peersour 2021 compensation peer group and exceeded the S&P 500 indexIndustrials over the timeframe, reflecting strong performance over this period, which demonstrates support for the link between the metrics of adjusted EPS and adjusted ROIC and the creation of long-term shareholder value.period.

The Company’s performance goals and actual calculated results for the 2016-20182019-2021 cycle are summarized in the table below. Straight-line interpolation is used to calculate actual payouts for these performance-based restricted stock units.

Despite the significant unforeseen impact of COVID-19, no adjustments or modifications were made to the financial performance metrics or targets for our

5 See Appendix A for reconciliations of adjusted EPS and adjusted ROIC as used for external reporting to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

2019-2021 performance-based RSU cycle. Payouts earned for the 2019-2021 PRSU awards reflect formulaic calculations based on metrics and targets established prior to the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

2016-20182019-2021 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Cycle: Metrics, Weightings and Actual Results

           Threshold                  Target                  Maximum                  Actual        

  Three-Year

  Cumulative Adjusted

  EPS (80% weighting)

  $5.43  $7.75  $10.08  $8.26

  ROIC (20% weighting)

  9%  11%  14%  10.2%
  LOGO  LOGO  LOGO  LOGO

  Plan Funding

  50%  100%  200%  114%

    Threshold    Target    Maximum    Actual

  Three-Year Cumulative Adjusted EPS (60% weighting)

  $8.00    $14.11    $18.34    $13.42

  ROIC (40% weighting)

  8.5%

é

    11.5%

é

    14.0%

é

    

10.9%

é

  Plan Funding

  50%    100%    200%    92.7%

Under accounting rules, performance-based restricted stock units are expensed over the vesting period using the fair value on the date of grant and adjusted quarterly to account for actual and anticipated performance.

Time-Based Restricted Stock Units

Time-based restricted stock units that were awarded in 20182021 to each NEO vest 25% each year over a four-year period. Cumulative dividend equivalents are paid in cash upon vesting. For information about the specific number of time-based restricted stock units awarded to the NEOs in 2018,2021, see the “2018 2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table on page 51.61.

Under accounting rules, time-based restricted stock units are expensed over the vesting period using the fair value on the date of grant.

Retirement Programs

The Company has beenis transitioning and continues to transition, away from defined benefit plans to the use of market-competitive defined contribution and employee savings plans for all eligible salaried employees, including the NEOs. The NEOs also participate in the Company’s nonqualified retirement programs based on eligibility.

Several years ago, the Company closed its primary defined benefit plan in the United States (the “Pension Plan”) to new entrants and ceased providing Excess Benefit Agreements to newly appointed officers. On October 1,In 2018, the Company announced that, effective December 31, 2022, it wouldwill be freezing benefits under the Company’s primary U.S. defined benefit pension plan (Mr.Pension Plan. Mr. Coughlin and Mr. Myers participateparticipates in this planthe Pension Plan and will cease to accrue benefits after December 31, 2022).2022. Mr. Myers participated in the Pension Plan until his retirement on November 30, 2021. To align with this action, on November 8,in 2018, the Compensation Committee approved the freezing of benefits under the Excess Benefit Agreements, also effective as of December 31, 2022 (Mr. Coughlin, Mr. Fracassa and Mr. Kyle have Excess Benefit Agreements and will cease to accrue benefits under these arrangements after December 31, 2022). During 2021, the Company made the decision to update the marriage assumptions under the Excess Benefit Agreements for the remaining non-retired participants (Mr. Kyle, Mr. Fracassa and Mr. Coughlin) to reflect their current marital statuses.

Due to the varying tenure of our NEOs and the transition of our retirement plans, our U.S.-based NEOs participate (or participated) in different programs based on their eligibility as follows:

 

Name  Defined Benefit  Defined Contribution
 Qualified

Nonqualified

Qualified

Nonqualified

   NonqualifiedQualifiedNonqualified
  Pension Plan  Supplemental Pension Plan  

SIP Plan

Matching
Contributions

  Contributions  

  Core DC
Contribution
  

Post-Tax

Savings

Plan

Post-Tax  
  Savings Plan  Name
  
Pension
Plan
  Restoration
Portion
  Excess Benefit
Agreement

  Richard G. Kyle

        

  Philip D. Fracassa

      

  Christopher A. Coughlin

        

  Hansal N. Patel

        

  Carolyn E. Cheverine

  

  Ronald J. Myers

          

Because Mr. Roellgen is based in Colmar, France, he does not participate in the U.S. plans outlined above. A summary of the plans in which he participates is set forth below.

The following is a summary of the plans in which the NEOs other than Mr. Roellgen participate (or participated):

 

 

Qualified Pension Plan: The Pension Plan benefit replaces a targeted percentage ofpre-retirement income, subject to limits on benefits and compensation imposed by the Code.Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). Eligible salaried employees whose age plus years of service equaled or exceeded 50 as of December 31, 2003 participate in the Pension Plan, which provides an annual benefit of 0.75%timesFinal Average Earningstimesyears of service. “Final Average Earnings” is based on the highest fivenon-consecutive years of eligible compensation over the 10 years preceding retirement. Eligible compensation includes base salary and annual cash incentive but excludes long-term incentives. The benefit is payable beginning at age 65 for the lifetime of the employee, with alternative forms of payment, including a lump sum option, available with actuarial adjustments. Participants may retire early if they meet certain eligibility requirements, with the benefit reduced if started before age 62. As of December 31, 2018,2021, Mr. Coughlin and Mr. Myers are bothis eligible for early retirement.retirement under this plan. Mr. Myers retired from the Company on November 30, 2021 and met the eligibility requirements to receive unreduced benefits under the plan.

 

 

Nonqualified Supplemental Pension Plan: The Supplemental Pension Plan benefit replaces a targeted percentage ofpre-retirement income. There are two components to this plan:

 

 (1)

Restoration Portion: A restoration portion restores benefits to affected Company employees that would otherwise be provided under the Pension Plan were it not for Code limits; and

 (2)

Individual Excess Benefits Agreements: These arrangements are for “grandfathered”legacy NEOs whichand provide for a benefit based on Final Average Earnings as described above with offsets for other Company-provided benefits.

Supplemental retirement benefits for NEOs who have an Excess BenefitsBenefit Agreement will be calculated using a target benefit of 60% of Final Average Earnings, offset by the sum of: (a) an annuity which could be purchased at market rates with the value of Company matching contributions, andany “Core DC” contributions madeavailable under the Company’s Savings and Investment Retirement Plan (the “SIP Plan”), and“Post-Tax Savings Plan” contributions, in each case using assumed contribution rates and assuming earnings were accumulated at an 8% interest rate until benefit commencement, and (b) any Company-provided defined benefit pensions. The net benefit after offsets is automatically paid as a lifetime annuity or an unadjusted 50%joint-and-survivor annuity depending on whether the executive is married when benefits commence. Alternatively, the executive can elect an actuarially equivalent lump sum.

Participating NEOs ratably earn the 60% benefit over 10 years (15 years for Mr. Kyle) of Company service. All participating NEOs have at least five years of officer service and are therefore fully vested in this benefit to the extent it is earned. Participating NEOs can retire after age 55, but the benefit is reduced by 4% for each year benefits commence prior to age 62.

 

 · 

Qualified SIP Plan Matching Contributions: The SIP Plan is a savings plan which matches 100% on the first 3% of pay contributed by the employee plus 50% on the next 3%, subject to Code limits on compensation and contributions.

 

 · 

Qualified Core DC contribution refersContributions: Core DC contributions refer tonon-matching Company contributions provided within the SIP Plan to eligible U.S.-based salaried employees not earning Pension Plan service. Contributions range from 1% to 4.5% of eligible compensation (up to Code limits) based on an employee’s age plus years of service.

Employees impacted by the December 31, 2022 freezing of benefits under the Company’s primary U.S. defined benefit pension plan will be eligible to receive the Core DC contribution under the SIP Plan after December 31, 2022.

 

 · 

Nonqualified Post-Tax Savings Plan: ThePost-Tax Savings Plan is intended to restore benefits that would be provided under the SIP Plan were it not for Code limits. Affected employees have the option each year of taking these contributions in taxable cash or to defer the amounts with interest credited at a market-based interest rate (currently prime(prime + 1%).

Because Mr. Roellgen is based in Colmar, France, he does not participate in the U.S. plans outlined above. Instead, Mr. Roellgen participates in a legally required French Retirement Indemnity Plan (the “FRIP”) as well as the Timken Europe Supplementary Pension Plan with Defined Benefits (the “Europe Executive Plan”). The FRIP covers all French employees and pays a lump sum benefit based on service. The maximum FRIP benefit payable is six months of pay following 40 years of service. Mr. Roellgen’s benefits under the Europe Executive Plan are equal to 10% of his highest 3 years of pension earnings multiplied by the ratio of his years of service at December 31, 2012 to his years of service at retirement. The benefit is paid in the form of a 60% joint-and-survivor annuity. The Europe Executive Plan benefit vests only upon his retirement from the Company. While his accumulation of years of service was frozen under the Europe Executive Plan in 2012, his benefit continues to reflect compensation increases since 2012. Following the freeze of accumulation of years of service under the Europe Executive Plan, Mr. Roellgen commenced earning benefits under the Company’s French qualified defined contribution plan (the “French DC”). The French DC provides contributions of 4% of eligible compensation to certain employees under French law.

Deferred Compensation

The Company permits certain employees, including the U.S.-based NEOs, to participate in a 1996 Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2019 (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”), that allows them to defer, the receipt, on apre-tax basis, the receipt of certain types of compensation until a portion of theirspecified point in the future. Eligible compensation includes salary, incentive compensation payable in cash, employee or Company 401(k) contributions and/or core defined contributions in excess of tax limits and/or incentive compensation payable in cash, until a specified point in the future.limits. Cash deferrals earn interest quarterly at a rate based on the prime rate plus one percent.1%. All of the NEOs (other than Mr. Roellgen) were eligible to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan during 2018 and2021, but none earned “above-market” or preferential interest, as defined by the SEC.

The Deferred Compensation Plan is not funded by the Company, and participants have an unsecured contractual commitment by the Company to pay the amounts due under the plan. When such payments are due, they will be distributed from the Company’s general assets. In the event of a change in control of the Company, as defined in the Deferred Compensation Plan, participants are entitled to receive deferred amounts immediately. The Compensation Committee believes that providing employees with tax deferral opportunities aids in the attractionrecruitment and retention of such employees.retention.

The value of deferred compensation amounts is quantified each year and this program is reviewed periodically for its competitiveness. The value of deferred compensation has not had a significant impact on decisions regarding salary, annual cash incentive awards or long-term incentive grants for our NEOs.

Other Benefits

The NEOs are eligible to participate in a number of benefit programs offered broadly to certain other employees, including health, disability and life insurance programs.

Additionally, Mr. Roellgen participates in the Timken European Stock Ownership Plan (the “TESOP”). The TESOP is a stock ownership plan established in accordance with French law that allows participants to make contributions to a fund with a corresponding company match of up to 1.4% (subject to certain legal limits) that invests a portion of the contribution in Company stock. Mr. Roellgen also participates in a legally required French profit-sharing plan that provides a modest benefit.

The NEOs also may receive certain limited perquisites, including executive physicals, access to corporate country club memberships (although personal expenses are not reimbursed), and travel for spouses when accompanying NEOs on business travel. We eliminated the financial planning allowance for NEOs beginning January 1, 2018, continuing our practiceMr. Roellgen also receives reimbursement of limiting the amount and use of perquisites that we offer to our NEOs.Company car-related expenses in accordance with local benefits practices in France.

The Company does not provide taxgross-ups for these benefits to executives. These benefits are intended to provide executives with a competitive perquisite program that is reasonable and consistent with the Company’s overall approach to executive compensation. The total cost of these benefits is a very small percentage of each NEO’s total compensation.

Severance Agreements

In addition to retirement payments, the Company provides termination-related payments through severance agreements with individual executivesNEOs in the event of involuntary termination of employment without cause or, following a change in control, in the event of involuntary termination of employment without cause or termination of employment by the executive under certain circumstances. Severance agreements are provided based on competitive market practice and the Company’s desire to ensure some level of income continuity should an executive’s employment be terminated without cause. The Company believes that providing for such income continuity results in greater management stability and lower unwanted management turnover.cause or terminated under other qualifying circumstances.

The level of severance benefits reflects the Company’s perception of competitive market practice for the NEOs’ positions, based on an assessment by WTW. Severance pay was established as a multiple of base salary and actual annual cash incentive compensation. In the event of a qualifying termination of employment, an NEO would also be entitled to vesting of equity-based awards in accordance with the respective grant agreement, health and welfare benefits, outplacement services, and (in the event of a qualifying termination that follows a change in control) benefits underourunderour retirement benefit programs.

The types of severance benefits for which our NEOs are potentially eligible, and the potential benefit and compensation amounts, are further described and quantified below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 5566 and in the “Termination Scenarios” table on page 58.70.

The severance agreements do not contain excise taxgross-up provisions.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Stock ownership guidelines have been established for all senior executives (including the NEOs) and are intended to align the interests of executive management with those of our shareholders. These guidelines establish a specific ownership target for each of the NEOs.

In determining whether the executive met his or her individual ownership target for 2018,2021, the Company considered shares owned by the executive and full-value equity awards held by the executive, including deferred shares and time-based restricted stock units (stock settled) still subject to vesting conditions. Performance-based shares/units are not counted towards ownership until they are vested, and shares that are subject to unexercised options are not counted towards ownership.

The sharestock ownership requirement is based on a multiple of base salary. Each NEO must meet this requirement within five years of becoming an NEO. The NEO must retain any net shares after tax until the ownership requirement is met. If ownership falls below the requirement due to a decline

in share price, the expectation would be for the NEO to maintain net shares after tax with respect to vested equity awards until the ownership requirement is met. The stock ownership guidelines do not require purchasing shares on the open market, but rather maintaining net shares on future vestings. As of December 31, 2018,2021, all active NEOs (except Mr. Myers)currently serving at the Company exceeded their individual ownership target. Mr. Myers was appointed as Executive Vice President, Human Resources in November 2017 and is on track to achieve his ownership requirement within the five-year time frame.targets.    

 

Officer

Name

Stock Ownership Requirement -

Multiple of Base Salary

Actual Stock Ownership –

Multiple of Base Salary*

CEO  Mr. Kyle

  5x26.7x

Other NEOs  Mr. Fracassa

  3x12.8x

  Mr. Coughlin

3x15.2x

  Mr. Patel

2x2.0x

  Mr. Roellgen

2x13.4x

* Calculated by multiplying the number of shares held by each NEO on December 31, 2021 by the daily average stock price for the year ending December 31, 2021 and dividing that product by each NEO’s 2021 base salary.

Anti-Hedging/Pledging Policies

The Company has aadopted formal policypolicies that prohibitsprohibit our Directors, NEOs, other officers, and employees (and related persons) from pledging Company common shares or hedging the economic risk related to such stock ownership. In addition to prohibiting hedging transactions generally, the policies also expressly forbid use of the following types of hedging transactions: puts, calls, short sales, and the purchase of Company stock on margin.

Compensation Risk Assessment

The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the risk associated with the Company’s compensation programs. As part of this process, the Compensation Committee reviewed a comprehensive risk assessment conducted by WTW in 20162020 and concluded that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.Company, and that several of our current practices effectively mitigate risk and promote performance. In each of 2017 and 2018,2021, the Compensation Committee discussed any year-over-year changes that could impact risk with WTW. The Compensation Committee and WTW concluded that no plan changes were implemented in either 2017 or 20182021 that would materially affect materially the existing risk profile of the compensation programs, and that several of our current practices effectively mitigate risk and promote performance.

Clawback Provisions

The Company maintains specific provisions regarding the recovery of awards to deter certain types of conduct, including conduct that could affect the accuracy of the Company’s financial statements. These provisions apply to both short- and long-term incentive programs where, if personal misconduct or any

fraudulent activity on the part of the executive leads to the restatement of Company financial results, the Company can clawback an award. In such cases, the Compensation Committee has discretion, based on applicable facts and circumstances, to cause the Company to seek to recover all or any portion of the equity-based or cash incentive paid or payable to the executive for some or all of the years covered by the restatement.

Certain Tax and Accounting Considerations

Among relevant considerations, the Company generally considers the overall expense arising from aggregate executive compensation, as well as the accounting and tax treatment of such programs, in setting executive compensation. Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a federal income tax deduction to publicly traded companies for compensation paid to certain executives (and, beginning in 2018, certain former executives) to the extent such compensation exceeds $1 million per executive in any fiscal year. Historically, compensation that satisfies the Code’s requirements for performance-based compensation has not been subject to that deduction limitation, but that exemption was repealed through U.S. Federal Tax Reform, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, unless transition relief for certain compensation arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017 is available. As a result, it is uncertain whether compensation that the Compensation Committee may have intended to structure as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) prior to 2018 will be deductible.

Compensation Committee Report

 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A for the year ended December 31, 20182021 with our management. Based on the review and discussion referred to above, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board, and our Board approved, the inclusion of the CD&A in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 and this Proxy Statement for filing with the SEC.

 

Ajita G. Rajendra (Compensation Committee Chair)
Elizabeth A. Harrell

Sarah C. Lauber

John A. Luke, Jr. (Compensation Committee Chairman)

Elizabeth A. Harrell

Christopher L. Mapes

James F. Palmer

Ajita G. Rajendra

Joseph W. Ralston

Jacqueline F. Woods

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2018 2021 Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table sets forth information concerning compensation for our NEOs for 2018:2021, 2020 and 2019, as applicable:

 

Name and Principal Position  Year   Salary   Stock
Awards(2)
   Option
Awards (3)
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation (4)
   Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings (5)
   All Other
Compensation (6)
   Total   Year   Salary (2)   Stock Awards (3) Option Awards (4)  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation (5)
   Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings (6)
 All Other
Compensation (7)
   Total 

Richard G. Kyle

   2018    $941,667    $2,913,413    $1,248,177    $1,982,811    $1,303,000    $331,204    $8,720,272      2021    $1,037,145    $4,422,240  -   $958,338    $2,674,337  $573,270    $9,665,330 

President & CEO

   2017    $900,000    $2,912,604    $1,248,150    $1,477,656    $1,706,000    $359,563    $8,603,973      2020    $843,093    $4,421,376  -   $974,914    $4,448,000  $576,880    $11,264,263 
   2016    $900,000    $2,784,713    $1,192,862    $518,400    $1,123,000    $125,768    $6,644,743   
   2019    $981,667    $3,095,955  $1,326,112   $1,459,000    $4,434,000  $582,517    $11,879,251 

Philip D. Fracassa

   2018    $536,459    $706,586    $302,526    $705,993    $202,000    $194,194    $2,647,758      2021    $573,159    $1,249,358  -   $337,694    $708,956  $166,410    $3,035,577 

Executive Vice President and Chief

   2017    $512,500    $645,104    $275,865    $525,902    $670,000    $142,474    $2,771,845      2020    $499,112    $1,226,319  -   $338,373    $1,399,000  $174,084    $3,636,888 

Financial Officer

   2016    $500,000    $615,356    $263,494    $180,000    $407,000    $69,822    $2,035,672      2019    $558,775    $778,515  $333,624   $519,049    $1,699,000  $188,155    $4,077,118 

Christopher A. Coughlin

   2018    $527,917    $911,976    $390,248    $694,752    $0            $104,786    $2,629,679      2021    $572,970    $1,333,395  -   $337,582    $498,724  $158,935    $2,901,606 

Executive Vice President, Group

   2017    $515,041    $911,535    $390,345    $528,510    $833,000    $218,798    $3,397,229      2020    $497,200    $1,332,379  -   $337,210    $1,150,000  $167,245    $3,484,034 

President

   2016    $515,041    $871,350    $373,013    $185,415    $515,000    $41,218    $2,501,037      2019    $548,175    $911,640  $390,385   $509,203    $1,664,000  $167,120    $4,190,523 

Hansal N. Patel

   2021    $415,215    $704,048  -   $198,400            -  $53,761   $1,371,424 

Vice President, General Counsel

              

& Secretary

                  

Andreas Roellgen (1)

   2021    $375,501    $472,478  -   $151,609    $0  $72,420    $1,072,008 

Vice President, Europe, Asia and

   2020    $304,998    $395,074  -   $136,003    $315,000  $55,845    $1,206,920 

Africa

   2019    $309,520    $191,700  $81,670   $172,509    $267,000  $58,903    $1,081,302 

Ronald J. Myers

   2018    $372,075    $289,109    $123,995    $359,084    $132,000    $51,647    $1,327,910      2021    $386,819    $582,660  -   $198,945    $181,931  $109,404    $1,459,759 

Executive Vice President, Human

   2017    $330,661    $289,106    $123,755    $248,826    $246,000    $37,617    $1,275,965   

Resources

   2016    $291,996    $176,213    $74,960    $71,476    $150,000    $20,669    $785,314   

Carolyn E. Cheverine(1)

   2018    $204,200    $317,015    $135,314    $197,070                    -    $611,685    $1,465,284   

Former Executive Vice President,

   2017    $212,500    $554,990    $370,004    $159,908                    -    $21,140    $1,318,542      2020    $359,115    $846,092  -   $208,615    $498,000  $65,509    $1,977,331 

General Counsel and Secretary

                        

Human Resources

   2019    $386,353    $350,385  $150,167   $283,249    $545,000  $58,969    $1,774,123 

 

 (1)

EffectiveMr. Roellgen’s compensation is generally based in Euros. The conversion rate used for purposes of converting the Euros earned by Mr. Roellgen into U.S. Dollars for purposes of the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column was 1.00 = $1.1370, which was the applicable exchange rate as of July 19, 2018, Ms. Cheverine ceased serving as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and her employment withDecember 31, 2021. For all other columns in this table, the Company ended.conversion rate used for purposes of converting the Euros earned by Mr. Roellgen into U.S. Dollars was 1.00 = $1.1833 (the average monthly exchange rate for the calendar year), which approach we believe provides a reasonable representation of his compensation by accounting for currency exchange fluctuations that occurred throughout the calendar year.

 

 (2)

2020 base salaries reflect temporary reductions that occurred between April and July 2020 for each of the Company’s NEOs in response to the impacts of COVID-19, as approved by the Board. No reductions to base salaries were made during 2021 in response to the impacts of COVID-19.

(3)

The amounts shown in this column for 20182021 include the grant date fair market value of time-based restricted stock units granted in 2018.2021. See the description of time-based restricted stock units on page 44.52. Additionally, this column includes the grant date fair market value of the performance-based restricted stock units for the 2018-20202021-2023 performance cycle at target. See the description of the performance-based restricted stock units on page 42.50. Should performance equal or exceed the maximum goals for these performance-based restricted stock units, the grant date fair value for such awards would be: Mr. Kyle - $4,161,380;$5,307,435; Mr. Fracassa - $1,009,090;$1,497,735; Mr. Coughlin - $1,301,548;$1,598,580; Mr. Patel - $844,110; Mr. Myers - $413,013;$698,445; and Ms. CheverineMr. Roellgen - $453,198. The amounts shown in this column are computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For Ms. Cheverine, the time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units included in this column were eligible forpro-rata vesting in connection with her cessation of employment with the Company as of July 19, 2018 in accordance with the applicable award agreement. See “Involuntary Termination Without Cause” on page 56 for more details on the treatment of these grants.$567,720.

The amounts shown in this column are computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

 

 (3)(4)

Nonqualified stock options were eliminated from our long-term incentive award mix in 2020.

(5)

The amounts shown in this column for 2018 represent the grant date fair value of nonqualified stock options granted in 2018 (calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718) using the Black-Scholes model. All stock options vest at a rate of 25% per year. Assumptions used to determine the value of these nonqualified stock options are listed in the discussion of Stock Compensation Plans in Note 11 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. For Ms. Cheverine, the stock options included in this column were eligible forpro-rata vesting in connection with her cessation of employment with the Company as of July 19, 2018 in accordance with the applicable award agreement. See “Involuntary Termination Without Cause” on page 56 for more details on the treatment of these stock options.

(4)

The amounts shown in this column for 20182021 represent actual cash award payouts under the annual cash incentive plan for 20182021 performance.

For Ms. Cheverine, the amount in this column reflectspro-ration in connection with the end of her employment with the Company as of July 19, 2018 in accordance with the terms of the annual incentive plan. See “Involuntary Termination Without Cause Mr. Myers’ actual award payout was prorated based on page 56 for more details on the treatment of this annual cash incentive.

(5)

The amounts shown in this column for 2018 represent the difference betweennumber of months worked during the accumulated benefit amounts shown inyear, prior to his retirement on November 30, 2021. Both Mr. Patel and Mr. Myers elected to defer receipt of a portion of their 2021 annual cash incentive plan payout under the 2018 Pension Benefits Table as of December 31, 2018 and those amounts calculated as of December 31, 2017. See“2018 Pension Benefits Table” on page 53 for a description of how the amounts as of December 31, 2018 were calculated. The amounts as of December 31, 2017 were calculated in the same manner as the December 31, 2018 amounts, except that a discount rate of 3.80% was used (compared to discount rates of 4.38% for the 2018 amounts for nonqualified benefits and 4.39% for the 2018 amounts for qualified benefits). For 2018, liabilities were determined assuming no probability of termination, retirement, death, or disability before age 62 (the earliest age unreduced pension benefits are payable from the plans). A measurement date of December 31, 2018 was used for all NEOs. Although $0 is reported for Mr. Coughlin, his aggregate accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2018 represented a decrease of $86,000 from his aggregate accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2017 because the negative impact from the increase in the discount rate outweighed the impact from changes to the other factors used in calculating his benefit.Deferred Compensation Plan.

 

 (6)

The amounts shown in this column for 20182021 represent the difference between the accumulated benefit amounts shown in the 2021 Pension Benefits Table as of December 31, 2021 and those amounts calculated as of December 31, 2020. See “2021 Pension Benefits Table” on page 65 for a description of how the amounts as of December 31, 2021 were calculated. For U.S.-based NEOs, the amounts as of December 31, 2020 were calculated in the same manner as the December 31, 2021 amounts, except that discount rates of 2.81% for nonqualified plans and 2.85% for qualified plans were used (compared to discount rates of 3.06% for the 2021 amounts for nonqualified benefits and 3.07% for the 2021 amounts for qualified benefits). For Mr. Roellgen, the amounts as of December 31, 2020 were calculated in the same manner as 2021 amounts, except that a discount rate of 0.25% was used (compared to a discount rate of 1.00% for 2021). While the Summary Compensation Table includes a $0 value for change in pension value for Mr. Roellgen, the value of his pensions actually decreased $186,100 due to the increase in discount rate year over year. Values were determined assuming no probability of termination, retirement, death, or disability before age 62, the earliest age unreduced pension benefits are payable from the applicable plans in each case. A measurement date of December 31, 2021 was used for all NEOs. The smaller year-over-year increase in actuarial pension values resulted from higher interest rates from the prior year measurement period, offset partially by an update to the marriage assumptions under the Excess Benefit Agreements for the remaining non-retired participants (Mr. Kyle, Mr. Fracassa and Mr. Coughlin) to reflect their current marital statuses. The reported amount for Mr. Myers reflects a year-over-year increase in value to both his Pension Plan, which was distributed to him in 2021, and his Supplemental Pension Plan benefit. Mr. Patel does not participate in the Pension Plan.

Several years ago, the Company closed the Pension Plan to new entrants and ceased providing Excess Benefit Agreements to newly appointed officers. Effective December 31, 2022, the Company is freezing benefits under both the Pension Plan and the Excess Benefit Agreements. See the “Retirement Programs” section on page 52 for additional details.

(7)

The amounts shown in this column for 2021 are detailed in the following table:

 

Name  

Annual
Company
Contribution
to SIP Plan
and Core DC
Program

(a)

  

Annual
Company
Contribution
to Post-Tax

Savings Plan

(b)

  Executive
Physicals
  

Personal Use
of Company
Country Club
Memberships

(c)

  

Spousal
Travel and
Related
Expenses

(d)

  Cash
Dividend
Equivalents
(e)
  

Life
Insurance

(f)

  

Other

(g)

 

Annual

Company
Contribution to

SIP, Core DC,

and/or French

DC

(a)

 

Annual
Company
Contribution to

Post-Tax
Savings Plan

(b)

 Executive
Physicals
 

Personal Use of

Company
Country Club
Memberships

(c)

 

Personal and
Spousal
Travel and
Related

Expenses

(d)

 

Cash Dividend
Equivalents

(e)

 

Life Insurance

(f)

  

Other

(g)

Richard G. Kyle

  $22,000  $171,108  $1,778  $6,763  $1,995  $124,810  $2,750  - $24,650 $146,375 $1,383 $10,000 $38,981 $346,886 $4,995  -

Philip D. Fracassa

  $22,000  $133,876  $2,541  $4,369  $1,756  $27,579  $2,073  - $24,650 $52,830 $2,201 - $1,177 $84,136 $1,416  -

Christopher A. Coughlin

  $12,375  $35,164  $1,157  $818  $14,170  $39,029  $2,073  - $13,050 $27,908 $1,905 $3,745 $62 $108,202 $4,063  -

Hansal N. Patel

 $21,750 $22,619 $2,823 - - $6,160 $409  -

Andreas Roellgen

 $20,660 - $2,189 - - $22,758 $2,078  $24,735

Ronald J. Myers

  $12,375  $15,565  $2,365  -  $11,535  $8,060  $1,747  - $13,050 $13,745 - - $62 $45,614 $2,606  $34,327

Carolyn E. Cheverine

  $24,700  $10,447  -  -  -  -  $1,798  $574,740

 

 (a)

SIP Plan”SIP” refers to the Savings and Investment Retirement Plan, which is the Company’s primary U.S. qualified defined contribution plan for eligible salaried employees, under which the Company makes matching contributions and “Core DC” contributions to the accounts of eligible U.S. salaried employees. Messrs. Kyle, Fracassa, Coughlin, Patel and Myers received SIP matching contributions during 2021. Messrs. Kyle, Fracassa and Ms. CheverinePatel received Core DC contributions during 2018.2021. “French DC” refers to the Company’s French

qualified defined contribution plan under which Mr. Roellgen received contributions. See the“Retirement Programs”section on page 4452 for plan details.

 

 (b)

The“Post-Tax Savings Plan” is the Company’snon-tax qualified restoration plan for eligible U.S. salaried employees whose contributions and benefits in qualified retirement plans are limited by Section 415 of the Code. Amounts shown in this column may also include amounts deferred into the Deferred Compensation Plan, if elected by the NEO, for Company 401(k) contributions and/or core defined contributions in excess of tax limits.

 

 (c)

The amounts shown for personal use of country club memberships reflect prorated amounts of Company-paid annual membership dues in 20182021 that relate to personal use by the NEOs. There are no incremental costs to the Company for personal use, as just one annual payment is made to cover membership dues for both business use and personal use, but all such costspersonal expenses are allocated to, and borne by, the NEO.NEOs.

 

 (d)

The amounts shown for spousalpersonal travel include actual and estimated incremental travel expenses for when a spouse accompanied an NEO onpersonal use of the Company aircraft. Incremental travel expenses for personal use flights include direct variable operating costs such as costs related to fuel, maintenance expenses, landing and parking fees, crew accommodations and meals. Since the aircraft is used primarily for business travel, or to the Company’s 2018 strategy meeting.Company does not include in the calculation the fixed costs that do not change based on usage. No taxgross-ups on the related imputed income are paid.

 

 (e)

Reflects cumulative dividend equivalents paid in cash in 2021 upon vesting for applicable time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units.

 (f)

The amounts shown represent the actual premiums paid by the Company for term life insurance (which is provided by the Company for all eligible employees at a level equal to one times their annual salary) and long-term disability insurance.

 

 (g)

This column reflects Mr. Roellgen’s Company car benefit in the amount of $10,424, Company contributions into his TESOP, and an additional amount of $11,068 paid under the legally required French profit-sharing plan. For Mr. Myers, this column reflects a severance paymentpayout for accrued, but unused vacation in 2021 in the amount of $574,740 which was made to Ms. Cheverine in connection with the end of her employment with the Company (as further described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control”). This amount does not include certain additional benefits such as continuation of health and welfare benefits (estimated value of $16,500 per year) and outplacement services (estimated value of $10,000 per year) since costs are only incurred and known if these benefits are elected.$34,327.

2018

2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

The following table sets forth information concerning certain grants made to our NEOs during 2018:2021:

 

Name  Grant Date 

Estimated Future Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards

   

Estimated Future Payouts Under

Equity Incentive Plan Awards

   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
   All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
   

Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards

($/share)

   Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards (5)
   Grant Date  Estimated Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
  Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards (4)
 
   

Threshold

   Target   Maximum   Threshold   Target   Maximum                       Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum     

Richard G.

  02/12/2018 RSUs (1)              18,650        $832,723   02/10/2021 RSUs (1)              23,675   $1,768,523 

Kyle

  02/12/2018 SEMPP(2) $113,000    $1,921,000    $2,938,000                 02/10/2021 CSTIP (2)  $128,795  $1,287,951  $2,575,902          
  02/12/2018 NQSOs (3)                121,300    $44.65    $1,248,177 
  02/12/2018 Perf RSUs (4)           6,990    46,600    93,200             $2,080,690   02/10/2021 Perf RSUs (3)           7,105  35,525  71,050      $2,653,718 

Philip D.

  02/12/2018 RSUs (1)              4,525        $202,041   02/10/2021 RSUs (1)              6,700   $500,490 

Fracassa

  02/12/2018 SEMPP(2) $40,234    $683,985    $1,046,094                 02/10/2021 CSTIP (2)  $45,384  $453,841  $907,682          
  02/12/2018 NQSOs (3)                29,400    $44.65    $302,526 
  02/12/2018 Perf RSUs (4)           1,695    11,300    22,600             $504,545   02/10/2021 Perf RSUs (3)           2,005  10,025  20,050      $748,868 

Christopher A.

  02/12/2018 RSUs (1)              5,850        $261,203   02/10/2021 RSUs (1)              7,150   $534,105 

Coughlin

  02/12/2018 SEMPP(2) $39,594    $673,094    $1,029,438                 02/10/2021 CSTIP (2)  $45,369  $453,691  $907,382          
  02/12/2018 NQSOs (3)                37,925    $44.65    $390,248 
  02/12/2018 Perf RSUs (4)           2,186    14,575    29,150             $650,774   02/10/2021 Perf RSUs (3)           2,140  10,700  21,400      $799,290 

Hansal N.

  02/10/2021 RSUs (1)              3,775   $281,993 

Patel

  02/10/2021 CSTIP (2)  $26,664  $266,638  $533,277          
  02/10/2021 Perf RSUs (3)           1,130  5,650  11,300      $422,055 

Andreas

  02/10/2021 RSUs (1)              2,525   $188,618 

Roellgen

  02/10/2021 CSTIP (2)  $20,375  $203,754  $407,508          
  02/10/2021 Perf RSUs (3)           760  3,800  7,600      $283,860 

Ronald J.

  02/12/2018 RSUs (1)              1,850        $82,603   02/10/2021 RSUs (1)              3,125   $233,438 

Myers

  02/12/2018 SEMPP(2) $20,464    $347,890    $532,067                 02/10/2021 CSTIP (2)  $29,216  $292,164  $584,328          
  02/12/2018 NQSOs (3)                12,050    $44.65    $123,995 
  02/12/2018 Perf RSUs (4)           694    4,625    9,250             $206,506   02/10/2021 Perf RSUs (3)           935  4,675  9,350      $349,223 

Carolyn E.

  02/12/2018 RSUs (1)              2,025        $90,416 

Cheverine

  02/12/2018 SEMPP(2) $20,295    $345,015    $527,670               
  02/12/2018 NQSOs (3)                13,150    $44.65    $135,314 
  02/12/2018 Perf RSUs (4)           761    5,075    10,150             $226,599 

 

 (1)

The “RSUs” amounts shown reflect the time-based restricted stock units granted to each NEO in 20182021 under the Long-TermEquity and Incentive Compensation Plan. See the description of time-based restricted stock units on page 44.52.

 

 (2)

The “SEMPP”“CSTIP” amounts shown indicate possible funding levelsreflect payout opportunities at threshold, target and maximum performance levels under the SEMPP for 2018. The SEMPP is a shareholder-approved plan in which all the NEOs participated in 2018. The Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion to reduce the NEOs’ 2018 awards to be in line with the corporate annual cash incentive plan. Target payout amounts for each of the NEOs under the corporate annual cash incentive plan calculation weredesign for 2021. Threshold is reflected as follows:the minimum payout if (a) the adjusted EBIT results would lead to a payout under that metric of zero, (b) one of either the adjusted EBIT margin or free cash flow metric results would lead to a payout of zero, (c) the results for the other metric identified in clause (b) (either adjusted EBIT margin or free cash flow) would lead to a payout at threshold under that metric, and (d) adjusted EBIT margin was greater than 8.5%. Mr. Kyle - $1,130,000; Mr. Fracassa - $402,344; Mr. Coughlin - $395,938; Ms. Cheverine - $202,950; and Mr. Myers - $204,641. The amounts shown for Ms. Cheverine reflect fullMyers’ actual award payout was prorated based on the number of months worked during the year, target amounts, see the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in the 2018 Summary Compensation Tableprior to his retirement on page 49 for her actualpro-rated payout.November 30, 2021. See the “Annual Cash Incentive” section on page 3847 for additional details.

 

 (3)

The “NQSOs” amounts shown reflect nonqualified stock options granted in 2018. All options granted to the NEOs were granted on February 12, 2018 with an exercise price equal to the opening price on the date of grant. All options were granted pursuant to the Long-Term Incentive Plan, have a10-year term and generally will become exercisable 25% per year over the four-year period from the date of the grant.

(4)

The “Perf RSUs” amounts shown indicate aggregate threshold, target and maximum award opportunities for the performance-based restricted stock units covering the 2018-20202021-2023 cycle granted to each NEO in 20202021 under the Long-TermEquity and Incentive Compensation Plan. Threshold is reflected as the minimum payout if the adjusted EPS metric payout is zero and the adjusted ROIC metric pays at threshold. Mr. Myers’ performance-based restricted stock unit award granted during 2021 will be prorated based on the number of months working during the three-year period and will vest following completion of the three-year performance period. The final performance score will be applied upon payout. See the description of the performance-based restricted stock units on page 42.50.

 

 (5)(4)

The amounts shown reflect the grant date fair market value of time-based restricted stock units nonqualified stock options and performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2018,2021, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The fair market value of time-based restricted stock units and

performance-based restricted stock units is the opening price of our common shares on the date of grant multiplied by the number of shares granted. The fair market valuegranted (or, for performance-based restricted stock units, the “target” number of options is determined by usingshares granted, which represents the Black-Scholes model.probable outcome of the applicable performance conditions as of the grant date).

For more information regarding certain compensation arrangements with our NEOs, please refer to the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section on page 55.66. For information regarding the amount of various compensation elements in proportion to total compensation, see the NEO pay mix charts in the “Aligning Pay with Performance” section on page 33.41.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20182021 Year-End

 

The following table sets forth information concerning unexercised Company stock options and stock awards that have not vested for each of our NEOs as of December 31, 2018:2021:

 

Option Awards (2)Option Awards (2)  Stock Awards
Name  Grant Date  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

(#) Options

  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

(#) Options

  

Option

Exercise

Price

  

Option

Expiration  

Date

  Grant Date  

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not
Vested

  

Market Value

of Shares or

Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested

  

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,

Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested

  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards: Market
or Payout Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested
 
  Option Awards(1)           Stock Awards  Exercisable  Unexercisable      
Name  Grant Date   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
   Option
Exercise
Price
   Option
Expiration
Date
   Grant Date Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
  

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have

Not Vested

  

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned

Shares, Units or
Other Rights That
Have Not Vested

  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout
Value of Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights That
Have Not Vested
       Exercisable   Unexercisable                  

Richard G. Kyle

   02/08/2011    17,000    -    $35.97    02/08/2021    02/12/2015 (2)   5,119  $191,041  -  -  02/11/2016  30,000  -  $27.75  02/11/2026   02/12/2018 (3)  4,663  $323,099  -  -
   02/09/2012    26,200    -    $37.31    02/09/2022    02/11/2016 (2)   14,338  $535,094  -  -
   02/07/2013    30,800    -    $40.56    02/07/2023    02/13/2017 (2)   13,763  $513,635  -  -  02/13/2017  70,000  -  $45.35  02/13/2027   02/12/2019 (3)  10,388  $719,785  -  -
   02/13/2014    108,800    -    $41.15    02/13/2024    02/13/2017 (3)   -  -  45,875  $1,712,055  02/12/2018  90,975  30,325  $44.65  02/12/2028   02/10/2020 (3)  25,013  $1,733,151  -  -
   02/12/2015    83,287    27,763    $41.79    02/12/2025    02/12/2018 (2)   18,650  $696,018  -  -  02/12/2019  69,212  69,213  $42.60  02/12/2029   02/10/2020 (4)  -  -  50,025  $3,466,232
   02/11/2016    91,900    91,900    $27.75    02/11/2026    02/12/2018 (3)   -  -  46,600  $1,739,112             02/10/2021 (3)  23,675  $1,640,441  -  -
   02/13/2017    29,437    88,313    $45.35    02/13/2027                       02/10/2021 (4)  -  -  35,525  $2,461,527
   02/12/2018    -    121,300    $44.65    02/12/2028                                             

Philip D. Fracassa

   02/08/2011    5,600    -    $35.97    02/08/2021    02/12/2015 (2)   1,132  $42,246  -  -  02/13/2017  10,625  -  $45.35  02/13/2027   02/12/2018 (3)  1,132  $78,436  -  -
   02/09/2012    6,000    -    $37.31    02/09/2022    02/11/2016 (2)   3,175  $118,491  -  -  02/12/2018  22,050  7,350  $44.65  02/12/2028   02/12/2019 (3)  2,613  $181,055  -  -
   02/07/2013    4,500    -    $40.56    02/07/2023    02/13/2017 (2)   3,057  $114,087  -  -  02/12/2019  17,412  17,413  $42.60  02/12/2029   02/10/2020 (3)  6,938  $480,734  -  -
   02/13/2014    19,400    -    $41.15    02/13/2024    02/13/2017 (3)   -  -  10,150  $378,798             02/10/2020 (4)  -  -  13,875  $961,399
   02/12/2015    18,393    6,132    $41.79    02/12/2025    02/12/2018 (2)   4,525  $168,873  -  -             02/10/2021 (3)  6,700  $464,243  -  -
   02/11/2016    20,300    20,300    $27.75    02/11/2026    02/12/2018 (3)   -  -  11,300  $421,716                 02/10/2021 (4)  -  -  10,025  $694,632
   02/13/2017    6,506    19,519    $45.35    02/13/2027          
   02/12/2018    -    29,400    $44.65    02/12/2028               

Christopher A. Coughlin

   02/08/2011    27,600    -    $35.97    02/08/2021    02/12/2015 (2)   1,600  $59,712  -  -  02/11/2016  57,475  -  $27.75  02/11/2026   02/12/2018 (3)  1,463  $101,371  -  -
   02/09/2012    26,200    -    $37.31    02/09/2022    02/11/2016 (2)   4,488  $167,492  -  -  02/13/2017  36,825  -  $45.35  02/13/2027   02/12/2019 (3)  3,063  $212,235  -  -
   02/07/2013    30,800    -    $40.56    02/07/2023    02/13/2017 (2)   4,313  $160,961  -  -  02/12/2018  28,443  9,482  $44.65  02/12/2028   02/10/2020 (3)  7,538  $522,308  -  -
   02/13/2014    35,400    -    $41.15    02/13/2024    02/13/2017 (3)   -  -  14,350  $535,542  02/12/2019  20,375  20,375  $42.60  02/12/2029   02/10/2020 (4)  -  -  15,075  $1,044,547
   02/12/2015    26,043    8,682    $41.79    02/12/2025    02/12/2018 (2)   5,850  $218,322  -  -             02/10/2021 (3)  7,150  $495,424  -  -
   02/11/2016    28,737    28,738    $27.75    02/11/2026    02/12/2018 (3)   -  -  14,575  $543,939                 02/10/2021 (4)  -  -  10,700  $741,403

Hansal N. Patel

  02/12/2018  -  438  $44.65  02/12/2028   02/12/2018 (3)  75  $5,197  -  -
   02/13/2017    9,206    27,619    $45.35    02/13/2027            02/12/2019  -  1,935  $42.60  02/12/2029   02/12/2019 (3)  295  $20,441  -  -
   02/12/2018    -    37,925    $44.65    02/12/2028                            02/10/2020 (3)  2,832  $196,229  -  -

Ronald J. Myers

   02/08/2011    3,800    -    $35.97    02/08/2021    02/12/2015 (2)   325  $12,129  -  -
             02/10/2020 (4)  -  -  5,675  $393,221
             02/10/2021 (3)  3,775  $261,570  -  -
                 02/10/2021 (4)  -  -  5,650  $391,489

Andreas Roellgen

  02/13/2017  6,850  -  $45.35  02/13/2027   08/21/2017 (5)  10,000  $692,900  -  -
   02/09/2012    5,100    -    $37.31    02/09/2022    02/11/2016 (2)   913  $34,073  -  -  02/12/2018  5,943  1,982  $44.65  02/12/2028   02/12/2018 (3)  307  $21,272  -  -
   02/07/2013    5,700    -    $40.56    02/07/2023    02/13/2017 (2)   1,369  $51,091  -  -  02/12/2019  4,262  4,263  $42.60  02/12/2029   02/12/2019 (3)  650  $45,039  -  -
   02/13/2014    3,900    -    $41.15    02/13/2024    02/13/2017 (3)   -  -  4,550  $169,806             02/10/2020 (3)  2,232  $154,655  -  -
   02/12/2015    5,231    1,744    $41.79    02/12/2025    02/12/2018 (2)   1,850  $69,042  -  -             02/10/2020 (4)  -  -  4,475  $310,073
   02/11/2016    2,888    5,775    $27.75    02/11/2026    02/12/2018 (3)   -  -  4,625  $172,605             02/10/2021 (3)  2,525  $174,957  -  -
   02/13/2017    2,918    8,757    $45.35    02/13/2027                           02/10/2021 (4)  -  -  3,800  $263,302
   02/12/2018    -    12,050    $44.65    02/12/2028               

Carolyn E. Cheverine

   05/30/2017    35,441    -    $46.40    07/19/2021    05/30/2017 (4)   11,608  $433,211  -  -

Ronald J. Myers (1)

  02/12/2018  -  3,013  $44.65  02/12/2028   02/12/2018 (3)  463  $32,081  -  -
   02/12/2018    3,287    -    $44.65    07/19/2021    02/12/2018 (2)   491  $18,324  -  -  02/12/2019  -  7,838  $42.60  02/12/2029   02/12/2019 (3)  1,175  $81,416  -  -
                   02/12/2018 (3)   -  -  2,537  $94,681             02/10/2020 (3)  3,169  $219,580  -  -
             02/10/2020 (4)  -  -  4,056  $281,040
             02/10/2021 (3)  3,021  $209,325  -  -
                 02/10/2021 (4)  -  -  1,428  $98,946

 (1)

Upon his retirement, Mr. Myers’ unvested nonqualified stock options, time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units were treated in accordance with the original terms of the respective grants. The performance-based restricted stock units in the table are prorated based on the number of months worked during the three-year period.

(2)

All option awards shown are nonqualified stock options that vest 25% per year over the four-year period from the date of grant and will expire ten years after the date of grant.

 

 (2)(3)

Time-based restricted stock units vest 25% per year over the four-year period from the date of grant. Upon an NEO becoming retirement eligible, restricted stock units may be withheld prior to vesting for taxes owed on such restricted stock units being deemed nonforfeitable.

 (3)(4)

Performance-based restricted stock units vest atafter the end of the three-year performance cycle based on the achievement of performance objectives. For the performance-based restricted stock units granted on February 10, 2020 and February 10, 2021, amounts are shown at target.

 

 (4)(5)

Ms. Cheverine’s deferredDeferred restricted shares for Mr. Roellgen vest 100% on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant in accordance with the terms of her applicable award agreement, which provide that the award will continue to vest following the end of Ms. Cheverine’s employment with the Company as if she had remained in continuous employment.grant.

The market value of the stock awards shown in the table above was determined based upon the closing price of our common shares on December 31, 2018,2021, which was $37.32.$69.29.

2018 2021 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to the exercise of stock options by and vesting of

other equity-based awards for our NEOs during 2018:2021:

 

  Option Awards  Stock Awards (2)
  

Option Awards

 

  

Stock Awards(2)

 

 
Name  Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
  Value Realized      
on Exercise(1)      
  Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
  Value Realized
on Vesting
  Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
  Value Realized
on Exercise (1)
  

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting

 

  Value Realized
on Vesting
 

Richard G. Kyle

  4,275  $129,896          98,585  $4,277,494  297,750  $14,219,067  70,866  $4,913,329
 

Philip D. Fracassa

  10,000  $316,600          21,778  $944,931  30,525  $1,233,402  17,859  $1,238,321
 

Christopher A. Coughlin

  -  -          30,846  $1,338,374  -  -  21,095  $1,463,722
 

Hansal N. Patel

  3,196  $162,532  2,582  $181,628
 

Andreas Roellgen

  18,525  $1,031,106  4,608  $320,566
 

Ronald J. Myers

  -  -          6,396  $277,658  9,850  $295,792  12,445  $862,175

Carolyn E. Cheverine

  -  -          -  -

 

 (1)

The value realized on the exercise of stock options is the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of our common shares at the time of exercise. Fair market value is determined by a real-time trading quote from the NYSE at the time of exercise.

 

 (2)

Stock awards include time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units.units for all NEOs. For Mr. Myers, stock awards also include deferred shares. The value realized on vesting for time-based and performance-based restricted stock units and deferred shares is the number of shares that vested in 20182021 multiplied by the fair market value of our common shares on the date of vesting. Fair market value for performance-based restricted stock units is determined by the average of the high and low price of our common shares on the date of vesting, which is the date that the Compensation Committee approves the performance score payout associated with such award.

2018

 2021 Pension Benefits Table

 

Year-over-year changes in pension values in the 20182021 Summary Compensation Table are influenced by plan participation, age, length of service, and changes in annual cash compensation, as well as external factors such as interest rates and changes to mortality assumptions.assumptions, discount rates, and interest on the prior year’s values as the benefits are one year closer to being paid. The smaller year-over-year increase in actuarial pension values resulted from higher interest rates from the prior year measurement period, offset partially by an update to the marriage assumptions under the Excess Benefit Agreements for the remaining non-retired participants (Mr. Kyle, Mr. Fracassa and Mr. Coughlin) to reflect their current marital statuses. Effective December 31, 2022, eligible U.S. participants will cease to accrue pension benefits under the Company’s primary U.S. defined benefit pension plans.

The following table sets forth the number of years of credited service and actuarial present value of the defined benefit pension plans for our NEOs as of December 31, 20182021 (see the“Retirement Programs” section on page 4452 for additional details of the material features of these plans):

Name  Plan Name  Number of Years
of Credited
Service
  Present Value of
    Accumulated Benefit (1)    
  Plan Name  

Number of Years
Credited Service

 

  Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit (1)
  Payments During Last
Fiscal Year (2)

Richard G. Kyle(2)

  Supplemental Pension Plan  12.7  $6,993,000

Richard G. Kyle (3)

  Supplemental Pension Plan  15.7  $18,549,337  -
  Pension Plan  -  -  Pension Plan  -  -  -

Philip D. Fracassa(2)

  Supplemental Pension Plan  13.2  $3,175,000

Philip D. Fracassa (3)

  Supplemental Pension Plan  16.2  $6,981,956  -
  Pension Plan  -  -  -
  Pension Plan  -  -

Christopher A. Coughlin

  Supplemental Pension Plan  34.5  $4,958,000  Supplemental Pension Plan  37.5  $7,836,685  -
  Pension Plan  34.5  $914,000  Pension Plan  37.5  $1,348,039  -

Hansal N. Patel (3)

  Supplemental Pension Plan  -  -  -
  Pension Plan  -  -  -

Andreas Roellgen (4)

  Europe Executive Plan  15.3  $955,100  -
  FRIP  24.3  $167,800  -

Ronald J. Myers

  Supplemental Pension Plan  36.6  $583,000  Supplemental Pension Plan  39.5  $1,377,650  -
  Pension Plan  36.6  $1,049,000  Pension Plan  39.5  -  $1,479,281

Carolyn E. Cheverine(2)

  Supplemental Pension Plan  -  -
  Pension Plan  -  -

 

 (1)

The “Present Value of Accumulated Benefit” is the present value of pension benefits earned as of December 31, 20182021 that would be payable under that plan for the life of the executive, beginning at age 62. SeeNote 1214 – Retirement Benefit Plansin the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statement in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20182021 for details about the assumptions used to determine present value.

 

 (2)

In connection with Mr. Myers’ retirement from the Company, Mr. Myers received a lump sum payment from the Pension Plan in 2021.

(3)

Because neither Mr. Kyle, nor Mr. Fracassa and Mr. Patel were not employed by the Company as of December 31, 2003, they did not accumulate any service under the Pension Plan. Ms. Cheverine was

(4)

Because Mr. Roellgen is based in Colmar, France, he is not eligible for either the Pension Plan or the Supplemental Pension Plan. Instead, Mr. Roellgen is a participant in the Supplemental PensionFRIP and the Europe Executive Plan. Mr. Roellgen had earned 15.3 years of service under the Europe Executive Plan or Pension Planwhen his accumulation of years of service under such plan was frozen at the end of 2012. Mr. Roellgen’s compensation is based in Euros. The conversion rate used for purposes of converting the Euros earned by Mr. Roellgen into U.S. Dollars for purposes of this table was 1.00 = $1.1370, which was the applicable exchange rate as these plans were closed to new entrants prior to her date of hire.December 31, 2021.

2018

2021 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

The table below sets forth information regarding Deferred Compensation Plan contributions, earnings and withdrawals during 20182021 and the account balances as of December 31, 20182021 for the NEOs:

 

Name  

Executive
Contributions
in 2018(1)

 

  Company
Contributions
in 2018(1)
  Aggregate
Earnings
in 2018(2)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
    Aggregate Balance  
at December 31,
2018(3)
  

Executive

Contributions

in 2021 (1)

  

Company

Contributions

in 2021 (2)

  

Aggregate

Earnings in

2021 (3)

  

Aggregate

    Withdrawals/    

Distributions

  

Aggregate Balance  

at December 31,

2021 (4)

Richard G. Kyle

  $47,083  -  $14,823  -  $291,130  $204,318  -  $33,164  -  $911,441

Philip D. Fracassa

  $71,112  $62,764  $21,875  -  $455,236  $56,038  $52,830  $37,254  -  $970,396

Christopher A. Coughlin

  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -

Hansal N. Patel

  $62,207  -  $3,989  -  $148,021

Andreas Roellgen

  -  -  -  -  -

Ronald J. Myers

  -  -  $11,368  -  $200,577  -  -  $9,654  -  $233,374

Carolyn E. Cheverine

  $3,318  $7,129  $225  -  $10,672

 

 (1)

Amounts shown as executive contributions or Company contributions in 2018,2021, if any, were reported in the 20182021 Summary Compensation Table.Table (for base salary) or in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table (for payments made under the annual cash incentive plan).

 

 (2)

Amounts shown as Company contributions in 2021, if any, were reported in the 2021 Summary Compensation Table under the “All Other Compensation” column (for Company contributions into the Deferred Compensation Plan).

(3)

This column includes interest earned from cash deferrals. The earnings during this year and previous years were not above market or preferential; therefore, these amounts were not included in the 20182021 Summary Compensation Table.

 

 (3)(4)

Includes $170,592$549,642 for Mr. Kyle, $242,114$676,285 for Mr. Fracassa, and $87,237 for Mr. Myers that was previously reported as compensation in the 2018 Summary Compensation TableTables for prior years (or would have been if the recipient had been an NEO in such year).years.

The Deferred Compensation Plan allows certain employees, including the U.S.-based NEOs, to defer, receipt on apre-tax basis, the receipt of certain types of compensation until a portion of theirspecified point in the future. Eligible compensation includes salary, incentive compensation payable in cash, employee or Company 401(k) contributions and/or core defined contributions in excess of tax limits and/or incentive compensation payable in cash until a specified point in the future.

limits. Cash deferrals earn interest quarterly at a rate based onequal to the prime rate plus one percent.1%. For further information, see the “Deferred Compensation” section on page 46.54.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

 

We have entered into severance agreements with each of the NEOs that provide for compensation in the event of termination of employment under certain circumstances (the “Severance Agreements”). In addition, the NEOs are entitled to post-termination payments or benefits under agreements entered into under the Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan, the Predecessor Long-Term Incentive Plan, and under our retirement and benefit plans in certain situations. The following circumstances would trigger post-termination payments to the NEOs: change in control followed by certain events described below,below; involuntary termination without cause, retirement,cause; retirement; permanent disabilitydisability; and death. All scenarios are assumed to have occurred on December 31, 2018.2021.

Change in Control

Under the Severance Agreements with the NEOs, when certain events occur, such as a reduction in the NEO’s responsibilities or base salary, or termination of the NEO’s employment without cause, within twoa specified number of years following a change in control of the Company (as defined in the Severance Agreements), each NEO will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment in an amount equal to a

multiple (that is set forth in the table below for the respective NEO) of the sum of: (1) the greater of (a) the NEO’s annual base salary in effect prior to the termination and (b) the NEO’s annual base salary in effect prior to the change in control,control; plus (2) the greater of (a) the NEO’s target annual cash incentive compensation for the year in which the NEO terminates employment and (b) the NEO’s target annual cash incentive compensation for the year in which the change in control occurs. For Mr. Roellgen, the amount is reduced by any severance payments he is entitled to receive under French law.

 

NEO  Change In Control Multiple      Additional Service Years    

Mr. Kyle

  3.0x3 years

Mr. Fracassa

  3.0x3 years

Mr. Coughlin

  3.0x3 years

Mr. MyersPatel

  1.5x

Mr. Roellgen

  1.5 years1.5x

In addition, each U.S.-based NEO who is eligible for a supplemental retirement benefit would receive a lump sum amount. The lump sum amount is determined by calculating the benefit under each of the QualifiedPension Plan and the Supplemental Pension PlanPlan. Under the Severance Agreements, pension benefits for Messrs. Kyle, Fracassa, and Coughlin would be calculated assuming the NEO continuedthey continue to earn service foruntil the number of years designated in the table above until December 31, 2022 pension freeze date, with annual earnings during those years equal to the compensation described above. The lump sum amount is reduced by the lump sum equivalent of the benefit otherwise payable from the QualifiedPension Plan. This lump sum is determined based on the mortality table and interest rate promulgated by the IRS under Section 417(e)(3) of the Code.

The NEOSeverance Agreements also would receive certain benefits based onprovide Messrs. Kyle, Fracassa, and Coughlin with contributions that would have been made to the SIP Plan and thePost-Tax Savings Plan duringon the Changethree years of change in Control period designatedcontrol compensation they would receive. The agreements for Messrs. Patel and Roellgen do not provide for any such contributions in the table above. event of a change in control.

At the time the conditions are met after a change in control, any unvested equity-based grants would vest and become nonforfeitable and the NEO would have three years to exercise all stock options. Performance-based restricted stock units would vest based on actual performance through the most recent date prior to the Changechange in Control.control. In the event of a change in control, the amounts payable under the Severance Agreements would become secured by a trust arrangement. As consideration for providing severance benefits, the Company receives confidentiality andnon-compete covenants from the NEOs, as well asand (where legally permissible) a customary release of claims against the Company. The NEOU.S.-based NEOs also would be entitled to continuation of health and welfare benefits through the applicable severance period (in other words, a number of years equal to the change in control multiple in the table above) and career outplacement services.services (or French unemployment benefits in the case of Mr. Roellgen).

None of the Severance Agreements with the NEOs containcontains an excise taxgross-up provision.

Voluntary Termination

If an NEO voluntarily terminates his or her employment with the Company, we generally provide no enhanced termination benefits such as severance, benefits, perquisites or vesting of any equity-based grants, although the Compensation Committee reserves the right to make adjustments where warranted.

Involuntary Termination With Cause

The Company provides no standard severance, benefits, perquisites or vesting of any equity-based grants in the case where an NEO is terminated by the Company with cause. As provided in the Severance Agreements, termination with cause can occur only in the event that the NEO has committed any of the following: an intentional act of fraud, embezzlement or theft in connection with his duties with the Company; intentional wrongful disclosure of secret processes or confidential information of the Company or a Company subsidiary; or

intentional wrongful engagement in any Competitive Activity (as defined in the Severance Agreements) that would constitute a material breach of the NEO’s duty of loyalty to the Company.Company (or a Company subsidiary as applicable).

If the Company terminates an NEO’s employment for cause, no benefit is payable from any ofunder the nonqualified pension plans.Excess Benefit Agreements.

Involuntary Termination Without Cause

In the case of an involuntary termination without cause other than in connection with a change in control, each NEO is entitled to a lump sum severance payment equal to a multiple (that is set forth in the table below for the respective NEO) of the sum of: (1) the NEO’s base salary and (2) an amount equal to the highest annual cash incentive payout percentage during the preceding five years (not to exceed 100%) multiplied by the target annual cash incentive compensation for the year in which the NEO is terminated.terminated (or, for Mr. Roellgen, the actual annual cash incentive compensation earned for the full year in which he is terminated). For Mr. Roellgen, the amount is reduced by any severance payments he is entitled to receive under French law. As consideration for providing severance benefits, the Company receives confidentiality andnon-compete covenants from the NEOs, as well asand (where legally permissible) a customary release of claims against the Company. Each NEO also is entitled to continuation of certain health and welfare benefits through the applicable severance period (in other words, a number of years equal to the applicable multiple in the table below) and career outplacement services.services (or French unemployment benefits in the case of Mr. Roellgen). Equity-based grants vest through the period of time equal to one year multiplied by the severance multiple in the table below in the case of an involuntary termination without cause, with up to three years to exercise stock options.

 

NEO Severance Multiple        

Mr. Kyle

 2.0x

Mr. Fracassa

 1.5x

Mr. Coughlin

 1.5x

Mr. MyersPatel

 1.0x

Mr. Roellgen

1.0x

The values shown in the Termination Scenarios table below for the retirement benefits (where eligible) are payable in the same form and manner as discusseddescribed in the “Retirement Programs” discussion on page 44.pages 52 to 54. In the event of involuntary termination without cause, the benefit is determined and payable as described in the “Retirement Programs” discussion on page 44,pages 52 to 54, but with up to two additional years of service credit.credit, except with respect to pension benefits for Messrs. Kyle, Fracassa, and Coughlin, which would be calculated assuming they continue to earn service until the December 31, 2022 pension freeze date.

Retirement

“Retirement” for purposes of outstanding grants to NEOs under the Long-TermEquity and Incentive Compensation Plan (for grants made in 2018) means either: (1) voluntary termination of the NEO at or after age 62; or (2) retirement after the NEO has reached age 55 and has accrued at least 15 years of continuous service, with the consent of the Board or the Committee. Treatment of equity awards for NEOs who retire includes normal vesting of Long-TermEquity and Incentive Compensation Plan awards as if the officer had remained in the continuous employ of the Company (except performance-based restricted stock units, which are prorated through the last day of employment and paid at the end of the performance period).

Amounts shown in the retirement column in the Termination Scenarios table below for “Retirement Benefits” are for NEOs who are eligible to retire under the Pension Plan or under an individual Excess Benefit Agreement as of December 31, 20182021 assuming the NEOs immediately retire. The amounts shown are in addition to the corresponding amounts reflected in the pension benefits table2021 Pension Benefits Table on page 5365 (which assumes retirement of the NEO at age 62). See the “Retirement Programs” section on page 4452 for additional details.

Death or Permanent Disability

“Permanent Disability” occurs if an NEO qualifies for permanent disability benefits under a disability plan or program of the Company or, in the absence of a disability plan or program of the Company, under a government-sponsored disability program.

Benefits for U.S.-based NEOs who die while actively employed are payable to the surviving spouse from the defined benefit pension plans at the NEO’s normal retirement date (or on a reduced basis at an early retirement date). The benefit is equal to 50% of the benefit payable as if thesuch NEO had terminated employment on the date of his death, survived to the payment date (as elected by spouse), elected the 50% joint and survivor form of payment, and died the next day. If the U.S.-based NEO has at least 15 years of service at time of death, the benefit is equal to 50% of the accrued benefit at time of death payable immediately, but with any applicable early commencement reduction.reduction.

All equity-based Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan and Predecessor Long-Term Incentive Plan grants immediately vest in the event of death or permanent disability, except performance-based restricted stock units, which are prorated and paid at the end of the performance period. In the case of disability, the employee has up to five years to exercise stock options. In the case of death, the survivor has up to five years to exercise stock options.

Termination Scenarios

 

 

Mr. Kyle 
    Voluntary
Resignation
   Termination
With Cause
   Retirement(5)   Death & Disability   Termination
Without Cause
   Change in
Control
 

Cash Severance(1)

   -    -    -    -    $4,143,334    $6,215,001 

Equity(2)

   -    -    -    $6,266,438    $5,747,205    $6,092,415 

Retirement Benefits (3)

   -    -    -    -    $1,358,000    $4,972,000 

Other Benefits(4)

   -    -    -    -    $53,000    $79,500 

Total

   -    -    -    $6,266,438    $11,301,539    $17,358,916 
Mr. Fracassa 
    Voluntary
Resignation
   Termination
With Cause
   Retirement(5)   Death & Disability   Termination
Without Cause
   Change in
Control
 

Cash Severance(1)

   -    -    -    -    $1,408,204    $2,816,407 

Equity(2)

   -    -    -    $1,438,482    $1,315,998    $1,396,236 

Retirement Benefits (3)

   -    -    -    -    -    $1,228,000 

Other Benefits(4)

   -    -    -    -    $39,750    $79,500 

Total

   -    -    -    $1,438,482    $2,763,952    $5,520,143 
Mr. Coughlin 
    Voluntary
Resignation
   Termination
With Cause
   Retirement(5)   Death & Disability   Termination
Without Cause
   Change in
Control
 

Cash Severance(1)

   -    -    -    -    $1,385,782    $2,771,564 

Equity(2)

   -    -    -    $1,960,991    $1,798,164    $1,906,392 

Retirement Benefits (3)

   -    -    $659,000    -    -    $199,000 

Other Benefits(4)

   -    -    -    -    $39,750    $79,500 

Total

   -    -    -    $1,960,991    $3,223,696    $4,956,456 
Mr. Myers 
    Voluntary
Resignation
   Termination
With Cause
   Retirement(5)   Death & Disability   Termination
Without Cause
   Change in
Control
 

Cash Severance(1)

   -    -    -    -    $576,716    $865,074 

Equity(2)

   -    -    -    $564,013    $512,437    $546,734 

Retirement Benefits (3)

   -    -    $146,000    -    -    $286,000 

Other Benefits(4)

   -    -    -    -    $26,500    $39,750 

Total

   -    -    -    $564,013    $1,115,653    $1,737,558 

Note: Ms. Cheverine is not reflected in the table above because her employment with the Company ended as of July 19, 2018. In connection with Ms. Cheverine’s cessation of employment, she received the compensation and benefits provided for in the event of an involuntary termination without cause (as described on page 56) under the terms of her outstanding deferred share, nonqualified stock option, time-based restricted stock unit and performance-based restricted stock unit agreements and her severance agreement. For more details see the 2018 Summary Compensation Table on page 49 and “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2018Year-End” on page 52. She is also entitled to the “Other Benefits” described in footnote 4 below.

Mr. Kyle

 

 
    

Voluntary    

Resignation    

   

Termination With    

Cause    

   Retirement       Death & Disability     

Termination  

Without Cause  

   

Change in Control 

and Termination 

 

Cash Severance (1)

   -    -    -    -    $4,667,152    $7,000,728 

Equity (2)

   -    -    -    $10,142,263    $11,540,743    $12,528,610 

Retirement Benefits (3)

   -    -    $1,124,480    -    $0    $1,110,664 

Other Benefits (4)

   -    -    -    -    $79,500    $79,500 

Total

   -    -    $1,124,480    $10,142,263    $16,287,395    $20,719,502 

Mr. Fracassa

 

 
    

Voluntary

Resignation

   

Termination With

Cause

   Retirement   Death & Disability   

Termination

Without Cause

   

Change in Control

and Termination

 

Cash Severance (1)

   -    -    -    -    $1,547,530    $3,095,060 

Equity (2)

   -    -    -    $2,722,755    $2,998,183    $3,390,295 

Retirement Benefits (3)

   -    -    -    -    -    $597,408 

Other Benefits (4)

   -    -    -    -    $79,500    $79,500 

Total

   -    -    -    $2,722,755    $4,625,213    $7,162,263 

Mr. Coughlin

 

 
    

Voluntary

Resignation

   

Termination With

Cause

   Retirement   Death & Disability   

Termination

Without Cause

   

Change in Control

and Termination

 

Cash Severance (1)

   -    -    -    -    $1,547,018    $3,094,036 

Equity (2)

   -    -    -    $3,052,236    $3,349,282    $3,770,843 

Retirement Benefits (3)

   -    -    $194,908    -    -    $225,607 

Other Benefits (4)

   -    -    -    -    $79,500    $79,500 

Total

   -    -    $194,908    $3,052,236    $4,975,800    $7,169,986 

Mr. Patel

 

 
    

Voluntary

Resignation

   

Termination With

Cause

   Retirement   Death & Disability   

Termination

Without Cause

   

Change in Control

and Termination

 

Cash Severance (1)

   -    -    -    -    $685,105    $1,027,658 

Equity (2)

   -    -    -    $938,471    $836,901    $1,069,083 

Retirement Benefits (3)

   -    -    -    -    -    - 

Other Benefits (4)

   -    -    -    -    $26,500    $39,750 

Total

   -    -    -    $938,471    $1,548,506    $2,136,491 

Mr. Roellgen (5)

 

 
    

Voluntary

Resignation

   

Termination With

Cause

   Retirement   Death & Disability   

Termination

Without Cause

   

Change in Control

and Termination

 

Cash Severance (1)

   -    -    -    -    $582,027    $873,040 

Equity (2)

   -    -    -    $1,545,852    $1,423,262    $1,641,819 

Retirement Benefits (3)

   -    -    -    -    -    - 

Other Benefits (4)

   -    -    -    -    $21,477    $21,477 

Total

   -    -    -    $1,545,852    $2,026,766    $2,536,336 

 (1)

“Cash Severance” amounts are determined by multiples of annual pay provided in the Severance Agreements.

 

 (2)

“Equity” includes deferred shares, time-based restricted stock units, performance-based restricted stock units and stock option grants. Equity-basedTreatment of equity-based grants immediately vest in the event of a termination or change in control (as definedis described in the Severance Agreements) followed by certainPotential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section on page 66. Beginning with the Predecessor Long-Term Incentive Plan grant for 2012, we modified our equity grant agreements to require double-trigger vesting for awards in the event of a qualifying termination events previously described or at the time of death or permanent disability. Outside of thefollowing a change in control context, equity-based grants vest through the period of time represented by the severance multiple in the case of an involuntary termination. All full-value awards are valued at the closing price of our common shares on December 31, 2018, which was $37.32.control. All stock options are valued based on the difference between the above closing stock price and the exercise price (or zero if the difference is negative), times the number of unvested stock options that would accelerate, as provided for in the Severance Agreements. Beginning withFor retirement eligible NEOs, amounts shown reflect both the Long-

Term Incentive Plan grant for 2012, we modified our equity grant agreements to require double-trigger vesting for awardsvalue of unvested restricted stock units and stock options that would vest as described in the eventRetirement” section on page 68 following retirement as well as the value of a qualifyingperformance-based restricted stock units, which are prorated through the last day of employment (for purposes of this table, assuming December 31, 2021 as the termination following a change in control.date). All full-value awards are valued at the closing price of our common shares on December 31, 2021, which was $69.29.

 

 (3)

“Retirement Benefits” for eligible NEOs represent the value of additional benefits earned under the qualified and supplemental plans as a result of retirement, termination without cause, or a qualifying termination following a change in control.

 

 (4)

“Other Benefits” consist of continuation of health and welfare benefits through the severance period, with an estimated value of $16,500 per year, plus outplacement services (if elected) with an estimated value of $10,000 per year.

(5)

Values are shown under the retirement scenario for only those NEOs who were eligible for early retirement as defined in the applicable retirement plan as of December 31, 2018,2021 and reflect the incremental present value above what they would receive at normal retirement age.age 62. As of December 31, 2018,2021, Mr. CoughlinKyle and Mr. MyersCoughlin both were eligible for early retirement as defined in the applicable retirement plan.

The table above only reports the value of Mr. Coughlin’s change in control SIP payments because the value of his pension as of December 31, 2021 would actually decrease $297,893 due to the change in control provisions. These pension provisions fully offset the value of his change in control SIP payments, which results in a lower net benefit value with the change in control severance benefits than without.

(4)

“Other Benefits” consist of continuation of health and welfare benefits through the severance period, with estimated values for U.S.-based NEOs of $16,500 per year and for Mr. Roellgen of $770 per year, plus outplacement services (if elected) with estimated values of $10,000 per year for U.S.-based NEOs and $20,700 per year for Mr. Roellgen.

(5)

Mr. Roellgen’s compensation is generally based in Euros. The conversion rate used for purposes of converting the Euros earned by Mr. Roellgen into U.S. Dollars was 1.00 = $1.1833 (the average monthly exchange rate for the calendar year).

Mr. Myers is not included in the table above due to his retirement from the Company on November 30, 2021. In connection with his retirement, Mr. Myers received cash payments of $198,945 for his annual incentive award, of which 85% was deferred into the Deferred Compensation Plan, $1,479,281 for his lump sum payment from the Pension Plan and $34,327 for accrued, but unused vacation paid to him in 2021. The value of his unvested equity upon retirement on November 30, 2021 was $1,816,464 assuming performance-based restricted stock units at target and valued at the closing price of our common shares on November 30, 2021, which was $65.83.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The table below sets forth information as of December 31, 20182021 regarding the Predecessor Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan. Under the Predecessor Long-Term Incentive Plan and Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan, we have made equity compensation available to Directors, officers and other employees of the Company. The Predecessor Long-Term Incentive Plan has beenand Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan were approved by our shareholders.

 

Plan Category  Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
  Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans (excluding
securities reflected in column (a))
  

Number of securities to be

issued upon exercise of

outstanding options, warrants

and rights

 

(a)(1)

  

Weighted-average

Exercise price of

outstanding options,

Warrants and rights

 

(b)(2)

  

Number of securities remaining available  

for future issuance under equity

compensation plans (excluding securities

reflected in column (a))

 

(c)(3)

  (a)(1)  (b)(2)  (c)(3)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(4)  4,382,842  $38.21  3,759,864  2,211,516  $41.59  7,738,437

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  -  -  -  -  -  -

Total:

  4,382,842

 

  $38.21

 

  3,759,864

 

  2,211,516  $41.59  7,738,437

 

(1)

The amount shown in column (a) includes the following:following grants made under both the Predecessor Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan: nonqualified stock options – 3,189,950;1,217,945; deferred shares – 112,786;55,138; performance-based restricted stock units – 741,241616,221 (assuming payout levels at target and settlement in shares)shares; at maximum payout levels for performance-based restricted stock units, an additional 616,221 shares would be issued); and time-based restricted stock units – 338,865322,212 (assuming settlement in shares).

 

(2)

The weighted average exercise price in column (b) includes nonqualified stock options only.

 

(3)

The amount shown in column (c) represents common shares remaining available under the Long-TermEquity and Incentive Compensation Plan, under which the Compensation Committee is authorized to make awards of common shares, nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, appreciation rights, restricted shares, deferred shares, performance shares, performance units and restricted stock units.units, and is inclusive of eligible recycled shares from the Predecessor Long Term Incentive Plan as described below. Awards may be credited with dividend equivalents payable in the form of cash or common shares. In addition, under the Long-TermEquity and Incentive Compensation Plan, nonemployee Directors are eligible for awards of restricted shares, restricted stock units, common shares and option rights. In 2015,2019, the Long-TermEquity and Incentive Compensation Plan was amended and restated and approved by shareholders at the annual meeting of shareholders to increase the numberauthorizing 10,000,000 shares of common sharesstock that may be issuedissued. Shares from the Predecessor Long-Term Incentive Plan are no longer available to be issued. However, if any common shares subject to an aggregateaward granted under the Predecessor Long Term Incentive Plan are forfeited, or an award granted under the Predecessor Long Term Incentive Plan (in whole or in part) is canceled or forfeited, expires, is settled in cash, or is unearned, the common shares subject to such award will, to the extent of 13,000,000.such cancellation, forfeiture, expiration, cash settlement, or unearned amount, be available for awards under the Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan. Under the Long-TermEquity and Incentive Compensation Plan, for any award that is not an option right or a stock appreciation right, 2.12 (awards issued prior to May 7, 2015) / 2.6 (awards issued on or after May 7, 2015)3.5 common shares are subtracted from the maximum number of common shares available under

the plan for every common share granted under the award. For awards of option rights and stock appreciation rights, however, only one common share is subtracted from the maximum number of common shares available under the plan for every common share granted. The amount in the table assumes payout levels at targetRecycled option rights and settlement in shares for performance-based restricted stock units and settlement in shares for time-based restricted stock units. At maximum payout levels for performance-based restricted stock units, an additional 1,927,227 shares would be subtractedappreciation rights from the Predecessor Long Term Incentive Plan are added back to the maximum number of securities remaining for future issuancecommon shares available under equity compensation plans. The entire amount in this columnthe plan by one common share. For any award that is not an option right or stock appreciation right, 3.5 common shares are added to the maximum number of shares available for future issuance other than uponunder the exercise of options, warrants or rights.plan.

(4)

The Company also maintains the Director Deferred Compensation Plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan pursuant to which Directors and other employees, respectively, may defer receipt of incentive compensation payable in common shares (other than restricted shares or options) authorized for issuance under the Long-TermEquity and Incentive Compensation Plan. The table does not include separate information about these plans because they merely provide for the deferral, rather than the issuance, of common shares.

CEO PAY RATIO

For 2018,2021, the ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation (“CEO Compensation”) to the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees (other than our CEO and the Excluded Employees (as defined below)) as described below (“Median Annual Compensation”), commonly referred to as the “CEO Pay Ratio”, was 173162 to 1.

This CEO Pay Ratio disclosure is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K using the data and assumptions described below, but there may be a degree of imprecision due to the permitted use of reasonable estimates and assumptions in preparing this CEO Pay Ratio disclosure. In this summary, we refer to the employee who received our Median Annual Compensation as our “Median Employee.” For purposes of this disclosure, the date used to identify our Median Employee was December 31, 2018.October 1, 2021 (the “Determination Date”). We did not use the same Median Employee to calculate the CEO Pay Ratio for 20182021 that we identified for the calculation in 20172020 (the “2017“2020 Median Employee”). From 2017 to 2018 there have been changes to, as the 20172020 Median Employee’s compensation and toEmployee is no longer employed by the size and composition of our total global workforce that, in the aggregate, caused us to reasonably believe would result in a significant change to our CEO Pay Ratio.Company.

For purposes of this CEO Pay Ratio disclosure, CEO Compensation was $8,720,272,$9,665,330, which represents the total compensation reported for our CEO in the 20182021 Summary Compensation Table.Table”. Also for purposes of this CEO Pay Ratio disclosure, Median Annual Compensation was $50,297,$59,720, which was calculated by totaling all applicable elements of compensation that our Median Employee earned during the 20182021 fiscal year in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of RegulationS-K.

To identify our Median Employee in 2021, we utilized the consistently applied compensation measure of ‘target“target total direct compensation” for the period from January 1, 20182021 to December 31, 2018,2021, which measure consisted of the sum of annual base pay plus the targeted value of annual and long-term incentives. For hourly workers, annual base pay was calculated using a reasonable estimate of hours worked during 20182021 multiplied by the applicable hourly rate. In addition, we annualized the total compensation (based on reasonable assumptions and estimates relating to our employee compensation program) for any employees (full-time and part-time) that commenced employment with the Company after January 1, 2018.2021. To establish our employee pool, as permitted by the applicable SEC rules, we excluded 82766056 non-U.S employees (the “Excluded Employees”) from our total global workforce of 17,45617,950 employees as of December 31, 2018October 1, 2021 who were employed in locations that individually represented less than 5% of our total global workforce from our Median Employee determination process to arrive at a pool of 16,62917,345 employees (this pool, excluding the Excluded Employees and the CEO, is hereinafter referred to as the “Employee Pool”). The Employee Pool doesdid not include any independent contractors or “leased” workers and excluded employees of businesses acquired by us in 2021, as permitted by the applicable SEC rules, and does not exclude any employees of businesses

6 The Excluded Employees include the following number of employees from the following countries: (a) Italy – 632 employees; (b) South Africa – 86 employees; (c) Mexico – 65 employees; (d) Russia – 18 employees; (e) Israel – 8 employees; (f) Indonesia – 7 employees; (g) Turkey – 6 employees; (h) Columbia – 3 employees; and (i) Philippines – 2 employees.

acquired by us or combined with us (other than employees who otherwise qualify as Excluded Employees).rules. We next calculated the median target total direct compensation for our Employee Pool and identified the subset of employees who were paid within a 1% range of such median (the “Comparison Group”). Finally, we selected a representative employee from the Comparison Group as our Median

Employee and determined our Median Employee’s Median Annual Compensation as described above.in 2021. We did not utilize anycost-of-living adjustments for purposes of this CEO Pay Ratio disclosure. Our Median Employee holds a position in our operations group in

6 The Excluded Employees included the following number of employees from the following countries: (a) United States.Kingdom – 188 employees; (b) Mexico – 182 employees; (c) Brazil – 87 employees; (d) South Africa – 83 employees; (e) Russian Federation – 24 employees; (f) Turkey – 8 employees; (g) Indonesia – 6 employees; (h) Israel – 6 employees; (i) Colombia – 3 employees; (j) Ghana – 3 employees; (k) Taiwan – 3 employees; (l) Thailand – 3 employees; (m) Bosnia and Herzegovina – 1 employee; (n) the Democratic Republic of the Congo – 1 employee; (o) Egypt – 1 employee; (p) Kazakhstan – 1 employee; (q) Nigeria – 1 employee; (r) Philippines – 1 employee; (s) Tanzania – 1 employee; (t) Ukraine – 1 employee; and (u) Vietnam – 1 employee.

PROPOSAL NO. 3: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT

OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, to perform the audit of our financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting for the 20192022 fiscal year. Ernst & Young has acted as our independent accounting firm for over 100 years. We believe the long tenure of Ernst & Young’s audit relationship with us is beneficial as Ernst & Young has developed significant expertise and experience with our business, accounting policies and practices and our internal control over financial reporting, which we believe allows for a higher quality audit and a competitive fee structure.

The appointment of Ernst & Young as our independent auditor is not required to be submitted to a vote of our shareholders for ratification. However, the Board of Directors believes that obtaining shareholder ratification is a sound governance practice. If our shareholders fail to vote in favor of the appointment of Ernst & Young, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain Ernst & Young and may retain that firm or another firm without resubmitting the matter to our shareholders. Even if the shareholders ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this matter is necessary to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young. Abstentions will not be counted for determining whether this matter is approved. Because the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young is a routine matter, we do not expect any brokernon-votes with respect to this matter.

Representatives of Ernst & Young are expected to be present at the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR RATIFICATION

OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR THE

20192022 FISCAL YEAR.

 

Auditor

 

Set forth below are the aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP for professional services rendered to us in 20182021 and 2017:2020:

 

 2018      2017 
  2021        2020 

Audit Fees:

          

Consolidated financial statements

 $3,614,000     $3,443,600      $3,263,500      $3,033,000 

New accounting standards and method changes

 $165,000     $751,938   

New accounting standards, method changes, and accounting consultations on matters addressed during the audit or interim reviews

   -                $367,500 

Statutory audits and SEC filings

 $483,400     $378,000      $558,000      $416,600 

Total Audit Fees

  $4,262,400     $4,573,538      $3,821,500      $3,817,100 

Audit-Related Fees:

          

Accounting consultations

  -     -   

Employee benefit plan audits

  -     $12,150   

Total Audit-Related Fees

  -     $12,150      -      - 

Tax Fees:

          

Tax compliance

 $112,486     $130,744      $205,000      $180,400 

Tax advisory and transfer pricing

 $942,841     $577,277      $1,220,000      $825,400 

Total Tax Fees

  $1,055,327     $708,021      $1,425,000      $1,005,800 

All Other Fees:

  $7,200     -               

Total fees

  $5,324,927     $5,293,709   

Publications and online subscriptions/content

   $7,200      $7,200 

Enterprise risk management assessment

   -      $25,000 

Forensic services

   -      $45,000 

Total Other Fees

   $7,200      $77,200 

Total Fees

   $5,253,700      $4,900,100 

The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures requiringpre-approval of all services provided by the independent auditor. Other than servicespre-approved in connection with the annual engagement of the independent auditor, all services to be provided by the independent auditor must be, and have been,pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Requests forpre-approval must contain sufficient detail to ensure the Audit Committee knows precisely what services it is being asked topre-approve so that it can make a well-reasoned assessment of the impact of the service on the auditor’s independence. Additionally, the Audit Committee haspre-approved the provision of a limited number of specific services that do not require further action by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has delegated itspre-approval authority to one of its members who must report anypre-approval decisions to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Audit Committee Report

 

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and our independent auditor the audited financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021. The Audit Committee also has discussed with our independent auditor the matters required to be discussed pursuant to Auditing Standard 1301, “Communications with Audit Committees,” as adopted by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.Board and the SEC.

The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosuredisclosures and the letter from our independent auditor required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, has discussed with our independent auditor such independent auditor’s independence, and has considered the compatibility ofnon-audit services with the auditor’s independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, for filing with the SEC.

 

 

James F. Palmer (Audit Committee Chairman)Chair)

 

Maria A. Crowe

 Christopher L. Mapes

Sarah C. Lauber

 Ajita G. Rajendra

Christopher L. Mapes

 Joseph W. Ralston

Ajita G. Rajendra

 

Frank C. Sullivan

PROPOSAL NO. 4: APPROVAL OF THE TIMKEN

COMPANY 2019 EQUITY AND INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

PLAN

Introduction

We are asking shareholders to approve The Timken Company 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2019 Plan”). The Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved and adopted the 2019 Plan on February 6, 2019, which, if adopted by our shareholders, will succeed the Long-Term Incentive Plan and The Timken Company Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Original LTIP” and, together with the Long-Term Incentive Plan, the “Predecessor Plans”), in each case including as amended or amended and restated. The Original LTIP terminated as to new awards on May 10, 2011 in connection with shareholder approval of the Long-Term Incentive Plan, and no further grants may be made under it. The Long-Term Incentive Plan has 1,080,026 shares remaining available for new awards as of the date of this Proxy Statement (assuming target-level payout for performance-based restricted stock units), but if the 2019 Plan is approved by our shareholders, no further grants will be made under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. However, outstanding awards under the Predecessor Plans, which are the only Company equity plans under which there are still outstanding awards, will generally continue in effect in accordance with their terms.

Shareholder approval of the 2019 Plan would constitute approval of up to 10,000,000 common shares, without par value, available for awards under the 2019 Plan, as described below and in the 2019 Plan. If the 2019 Plan is approved by shareholders, it will be effective as of the day of the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. If the 2019 Plan is not approved by our shareholders, no awards will be made under the 2019 Plan.

The actual text of the 2019 Plan is attached to this Proxy Statement asAppendix B. The following description of the 2019 Plan is only a summary of its principal terms and provisions and is qualified by reference to the actual text of the 2019 Plan as set forth inAppendix B.

Why We Believe You Should Vote for this Proposal

The 2019 Plan authorizes our Compensation Committee to provide cash awards and equity-based compensation as further described below, for the purpose of providing ournon-employee Directors, employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, and certain consultants and other service providers to the Company and its subsidiaries, incentives and rewards for service and/or performance. Some of the key features of the 2019 Plan that reflect our commitment to effective management of equity and incentive compensation are set forth below.

The following includes aggregated information regarding our view of the overhang associated with the Predecessor Plans and the potential dilution associated with the 2019 Plan. This information is as of February 20, 2019. As of that date, there were approximately 76,110,070 common shares outstanding:

Outstanding full-value awards (deferred shares, time-based restricted shares, performance-based restricted stock units, and time-based restricted stock units): 1,147,383 shares, assuming maximum payout for performance-based restricted stock units (approximately 1.5% of our outstanding common shares);

Outstanding stock options: 3,716,514 shares (approximately 4.9% of our outstanding common shares) (outstanding stock options have a weighted average exercise price of $38.90 and a weighted average remaining term of 6.0 years);

In summary, total common shares subject to outstanding awards, as described above (full-value awards and stock options): 4,863,897 shares (approximately 6.4% of our outstanding common shares);

Proposed common shares available for awards under the 2019 Plan: 10,000,000 shares (approximately 13.1% of our outstanding common shares – this percentage reflects the simple dilution of our shareholders that would occur if the 2019 Plan is approved); and

The total common shares subject to outstanding awards as of February 20, 2019 (4,863,897 shares), plus the proposed common shares available for future awards under the 2019 Plan (10,000,000 shares), represent a total overhang of 14,863,897 shares (19.5% under the 2019 Plan).

Based on the closing price on the NYSE for our common shares on February 20, 2019 of $43.51 per share, the aggregate market value as of February 20, 2019 of the new 10,000,000 common shares requested under the 2019 Plan was $435,100,000.

In determining the number of shares to request for approval under the 2019 Plan, our management team worked with WTW and the Compensation Committee to evaluate a number of factors, including our recent share usage and criteria expected to be utilized by institutional proxy advisory firms in evaluating our proposal for the 2019 Plan.

We currently anticipate that the shares requested in connection with the approval of the 2019 Plan will last for about four to five years, based on our historic grant rates and the approximate current share price, but could last for a shorter period of time if actual practice does not match recent rates or our share price changes materially. As noted below, our Compensation Committee retains full discretion under the 2019 Plan to determine the number and amount of awards to be granted under the 2019 Plan, subject to the terms of the 2019 Plan.

In evaluating this proposal, shareholders should consider all of the information in this proposal.

2019 Plan Highlights

Reasonable 2019 Plan Limits

Subject to adjustment and the applicable common share counting provisions as described in the 2019 Plan, awards under the 2019 Plan are limited to 10,000,000shares,plus any common shares that become available under the 2019 Plan as a result of forfeiture, cancellation, expiration, cash settlement or less-than-maximum earning of awards. These shares may be shares of original issuance or treasury shares or a combination of the two.

The 2019 Plan also provides that, subject as applicable to adjustment and the applicable common share counting provisions as described in the 2019 Plan:

the aggregate number of common shares actually issued or transferred upon the exercise of Incentive Stock Options (as defined below) will not exceed 10,000,000common shares; and

nonon-employee Director will be granted, in any one calendar year, compensation for such service having an aggregate maximum value (measured at the date of grant as applicable and calculating the value of any awards under the 2019 Plan based on the grant date fair value for financial reporting purposes) in excess of $650,000.

Allowances for Conversion Awards and Assumed Plans

Common shares issued or transferred under awards granted under the 2019 Plan in substitution for or conversion of, or in connection with an assumption of, stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted shares, restricted stock units, deferred shares, or other share or share-based awards held by awardees of an entity engaging in a corporate acquisition or merger transaction with us or any of our subsidiaries will not count against (or be added to) the aggregate share limit or other 2019 Plan limits described above. Additionally, shares available under certain plans that we or our subsidiaries may assume in connection with corporate transactions from another entity may be available for certain awards under the 2019 Plan, under circumstances further described in the 2019 Plan, but will not count against the aggregate share limit or other 2019 Plan limits described above.

Fungible Share Counting

Subject to the share counting rules in the 2019 Plan, the aggregate number of common shares available under the 2019 Plan will be reduced by (a) one common share for every one common share subject to a stock option or SAR granted under the 2019 Plan, and (b) 3.50 common shares for every one common share subject to an award other than a stock option or SAR granted under the 2019 Plan.

Limited Share Recycling Provisions

Subject to certain exceptions described in the 2019 Plan, if any award granted under the 2019 Plan (in whole or in part) is canceled or forfeited, expires, is settled for cash, or is unearned, the common shares subject to such award will, to the extent of such cancellation, forfeiture, expiration, cash settlement, or unearned amount, again be available under the 2019 Plan. Additionally, if, after the effective date of the 2019 Plan, any common shares subject to an award granted under the Predecessor Plans are forfeited, or an award granted under the Predecessor Plans (in whole or in part) is canceled or forfeited, expires, is settled in cash, or is unearned, the common shares subject to such award will, to the extent of such cancellation, forfeiture, expiration, cash settlement, or unearned amount, be available for awards under the 2019 Plan. Generally, the following will not be added (or added back, as applicable) to the aggregate number of common shares available under the 2019 Plan: (a) common shares used in payment of the exercise price of a stock option; (b) common shares used to satisfy tax withholding; and (c) common shares reacquired by the Company using cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options. Further, none of the common shares covered by stock-settled SARs that are exercised and settled in shares, whether or not all common shares covered by the SARs are actually issued to the participant upon exercise, will be added back to the aggregate number of shares available under the 2019 Plan. If a participant elects to give up the right to receive compensation in exchange for common shares based on fair market value, such common shares will not count against the aggregate number of shares available under the 2019 Plan.

Generally, any common share that becomes available under the 2019 Plan as a result of the recycling provisions of the 2019 Plan will be added back as (a) one common share if such common share was subject to a stock option or SAR, and (b) as 3.50 common shares if such common share was subject to an award other than a stock option or SAR.

Minimum Vesting Periods

The 2019 Plan provides that awards granted under the 2019 Plan will vest no earlier than after a minimumone-year vesting period orone-year performance period, as applicable, except that an aggregate of up to 5% of the common shares available for awards under the 2019 Plan (as may be adjusted under the adjustment provisions of the 2019 Plan) may be used for awards that do not at grant

comply with the minimum vesting requirement. However, notwithstanding the minimum vesting requirement, the Compensation Committee is permitted to (a) provide for continued vesting or accelerated vesting for any award under the 2019 Plan upon certain events, including in connection with or following a participant’s death, disability, or termination of service, or a change in control of the Company, or (b) exercise its discretionary vesting authority under the 2019 Plan (as described below and in the 2019 Plan) at any time following the grant of an award.

No Repricing Without Shareholder Approval

Except in connection with certain corporate transactions, changes in the capital structure of the Company or in connection with a change in control, the terms of outstanding awards may not be amended to (a) reduce the exercise price or base price of outstanding stock options or SARs, respectively, or (b) cancel outstanding “underwater” stock options or SARs (including following a participant’s voluntary surrender of “underwater” stock options or SARs) in exchange for cash, other awards or stock options or SARs with an exercise price or base price, as applicable, that is less than the exercise price or base price of the original stock options or SARs, as applicable, without shareholder approval. The 2019 Plan specifically provides that this provision is intended to prohibit the repricing of “underwater” stock options and SARs and that it may not be amended without approval by our shareholders.

Exercise or Base Price Limitation

The 2019 Plan also provides that, except with respect to certain converted, assumed or substituted awards as described in the 2019 Plan, no stock options or SARs will be granted with an exercise or base price less than the fair market value of a common share on the date of grant.

Code Section 162(m)

Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a deduction for certain compensation paid to certain executive officers (and, beginning in 2018, certain former executive officers) to the extent that compensation to a covered employee exceeds $1 million for such year. Compensation qualifying for a performance-based exception as “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code has historically not been subject to the deduction limit if the compensation satisfied the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code. This exception was repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, unless certain transition relief for certain compensation arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017 is available. Currently, the Company does not anticipate that it will be able to make any future grants under the 2019 Plan that will qualify for a performance-based exception. To be clear, shareholders are not being asked to approve the 2019 Plan (or any of its provisions) for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code or the performance-based exception.

Summary of Other Material Terms of the 2019 Plan

Administration

The 2019 Plan will generally be administered by our Compensation Committee (except as otherwise contemplated in the 2019 Plan) or such other body that may administer the 2019 Plan pursuant to its terms. Our Compensation Committee may delegate its authority under the 2019 Plan to a subcommittee. Any interpretation, construction and determination by our Compensation Committee of any provision of the 2019 Plan, or of any agreement, notification or document evidencing the grant of awards under the 2019 Plan, will be final and conclusive. To the extent permitted by applicable law, our Compensation Committee may delegate to one or more of its members or to one or more officers, or to one or more agents or advisors of the Company, such administrative duties or powers as it deems advisable. In addition, our Compensation Committee may by resolution, subject to certain restrictions set forth in the 2019 Plan, authorize one or more officers of the Company to (a) designate employees to be recipients of awards under the 2019 Plan, and (b) determine the size of such awards. Our Compensation Committee

is authorized to take action under the 2019 Plan subject to the express limitations contained in the 2019 Plan.

Eligibility

Participation in the 2019 Plan is available to any person who is selected by our Compensation Committee to receive benefits under the 2019 Plan and who is at that time (a) anon-employee Director of the Company, (b) an officer or other employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (including a person who has agreed to commence serving in such capacity within 90 days of the date of grant), (c) a consultant of the Company or a subsidiary, or (d) a person who provides services to the Company or any subsidiary that are equivalent to those typically provided by an employee. However, participants in the 2019 Plan must generally satisfy the FormS-8 definition of “employee.” As of February 20, 2019, we had approximately 17,000 employees and there were approximately 300 employees, 0 consultants, and 10non-employee Directors of the Company expected to participate in the 2019 Plan. The basis for participation in the 2019 Plan by eligible persons is the selection of such persons by our Compensation Committee in its discretion.

Types of Awards Under the 2019 Plan

Pursuant to the 2019 Plan, the Company may grant cash awards and stock options (including stock options intended to be “incentive stock options” as defined in Section 422 of the Code (“Incentive Stock Options”), SARs, restricted shares, restricted stock units, deferred shares, performance shares, performance units, cash incentive awards, and certain other awards based on or related to common shares.

Generally, each grant of an award under the 2019 Plan will be evidenced by an award agreement, certificate, resolution or other type or form of writing or other evidence approved by our Compensation Committee (an “Evidence of Award”), which will contain such terms and provisions as our Compensation Committee may determine, consistent with the 2019 Plan. A brief description of the types of awards which may be granted under the 2019 Plan is set forth below.

Stock Options

A stock option is a right to purchase common shares upon exercise. Stock options under the 2019 Plan may consist of either an Incentive Stock Option (subject to applicabletax-based limitations), anon-qualified stock option that is not intended to be an “incentive stock option” under Section 422 of the Code, or a combination of both. The term of a stock option may not extend more than 10 years from the date of grant. Our Compensation Committee may provide for the automatic exercise of a stock option in an Evidence of Award.

Each grant of a stock option will specify the applicable terms of the stock option, including the number of common shares subject to the stock option and the required period or periods of the participant’s continuous service, if any, before any stock option or portion of a stock option will become exercisable (subject to the 2019 Plan’s minimum vesting rules).

Each grant will specify whether the consideration to be paid in satisfaction of the exercise price will be payable: (a) in cash, by check acceptable to the Company, or by wire transfer of immediately available funds; (b) by the actual or constructive transfer to the Company of common shares owned by the participant with a value at the time of exercise that is equal to the total exercise price; (c) subject to any conditions or limitations established by our Compensation Committee, by a net exercise arrangement pursuant to which the Company will withhold common shares otherwise issuable upon exercise of a stock option; (d) by a combination of the foregoing methods; or (e) by such other methods as may be approved by our Compensation Committee. To the extent permitted by law, any grant may provide for deferred payment of the exercise price from the proceeds of a sale through a bank or broker of some or all of the shares to which the exercise relates. Stock options granted under the 2019 Plan may not provide for dividends or dividend equivalents.

SARs

A SAR is a right to receive from us an amount equal to 100%, or such lesser percentage as our Compensation Committee may determine, of the spread between the base price and the value of our common shares on the date of exercise. Each grant of SARs will specify the period or periods of continuous service, if any, by the participant with the Company or any subsidiary that is necessary before the SARs or installments of such SARs will become exercisable (subject to the 2019 Plan’s minimum vesting rules). A SAR may be paid in cash, common shares or any combination of the two. The term of a SAR may not extend more than 10 years from the date of grant. Our Compensation Committee may provide for the automatic exercise of a SAR in an Evidence of Award. SARs granted under the 2019 Plan may not provide for dividends or dividend equivalents.

Restricted Shares

Restricted shares constitute an immediate transfer of the ownership of common shares to the participant in consideration of the performance of services, entitling such participant to dividend, voting and other ownership rights, subject to the substantial risk of forfeiture and restrictions on transfer determined by our Compensation Committee for a period of time determined by our Compensation Committee or until certain management objectives specified by our Compensation Committee are achieved. Each such grant or sale of restricted shares may be made without additional consideration or in consideration of a payment by the participant that is less than the fair market value per common share on the date of grant. Restricted shares are subject to the 2019 Plan’s minimum vesting rules. Any grant of restricted shares may require that any and all dividends or distributions paid on restricted shares that remain subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture be automatically deferred and/or reinvested in additional restricted shares, which will be subject to the same restrictions as the underlying restricted shares. Any such dividends or other distributions on restricted shares will be deferred until, and paid contingent upon, the vesting of such restricted shares.

Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock units awarded under the 2019 Plan constitute an agreement by the Company to deliver common shares, cash, or a combination of the two, to the participant in the future in consideration of the performance of services, but subject to the fulfillment of such conditions during the restriction period as our Compensation Committee may specify. Each grant or sale of restricted stock units may be made without additional consideration or in consideration of a payment by the participant that is less than the fair market value of our common shares on the date of grant. Restricted stock units are subject to the 2019 Plan’s minimum vesting rules. During the restriction period applicable to restricted stock units, the participant will have no right to transfer any rights under the award and will have no rights of ownership in the common shares underlying the restricted stock units and no right to vote them. Rights to dividend equivalents may be extended to and made part of any restricted stock unit award at the discretion of and on the terms determined by our Compensation Committee, on a deferred and contingent basis, either in cash or in additional common shares, but dividend equivalents or other distributions on common shares under the restricted stock units will be deferred until and paid contingent upon vesting of such restricted stock units. A restricted stock unit may be paid in cash, common shares or any combination of the two.

Deferred Shares

The grant or sale of deferred shares represents an agreement to issue or transfer common shares to the participant following a deferral period in consideration of the participant’s performance of services, subject to fulfillment of conditions specified by our Compensation Committee. Each such grant or sale may be made without additional consideration from the participant or in consideration of a payment by the participant that is less than the fair market value of common shares on the date of grant. During the deferral period, the participant will have no right to transfer any rights under the award, and will have no rights of ownership in the deferred shares and no right to vote them. Our Compensation Committee may authorize the payment of dividend equivalents on the deferred shares, in cash or additional deferred shares, on a deferred and contingent basis, but dividend equivalents or other distributions on deferred shares will be deferred until and paid contingent upon the earning and vesting of such deferred shares.

Deferred shares are subject to the 2019 Plan’s minimum vesting rules. A deferred share may be paid in cash, common shares or any combination of the two.

Performance Shares, Performance Units and Cash Incentive Awards

Performance shares, performance units and cash incentive awards may also be granted to participants under the 2019 Plan. A performance share is a bookkeeping entry that records the equivalent of one common share, and a performance unit is a bookkeeping entry that records a unit equivalent to $1.00 or such other value as determined by our Compensation Committee. Each grant will specify the number or amount of performance shares or performance units, or the amount payable with respect to a cash incentive award being awarded, which number or amount may be subject to adjustment to reflect changes in compensation or other factors.

These awards, when granted under the 2019 Plan, generally become payable to participants based on the achievement of specified management objectives and upon such terms and conditions as our Compensation Committee determines at the time of grant.

The performance period with respect to each cash incentive award or grant of performance shares or performance units will be a period of time determined by our Compensation Committee (subject to the 2019 Plan’s minimum vesting rules) and within which the management objectives relating to such award are to be achieved. Any grant of performance shares or performance units may provide for the payment of dividend equivalents in cash or in additional common shares, subject to deferral and payment on a contingent basis based on the participant’s earning and vesting of the performance shares or performance units, as applicable, with respect to which such dividend equivalents are paid.

Other Awards

Subject to applicable law and applicable share limits under the 2019 Plan, our Compensation Committee may authorize the grant to any participant of common shares or such other awards that may be based on or related to common shares, as further described in the 2019 Plan (“Other Awards”). The terms and conditions of any such awards will be determined by our Compensation Committee. Common shares delivered under an award in the nature of a purchase right granted under the 2019 Plan will be purchased for such consideration, paid for at such time, by such methods, and in such forms, including, without limitation, common shares, other awards, notes or other property, as our Compensation Committee determines. In addition, our Compensation Committee may grant cash awards, as an element of or supplement to any other awards granted under the 2019 Plan. Our Compensation Committee may also authorize the grant of common shares as a bonus, or may authorize the grant of other awards in lieu of obligations of the Company or a subsidiary to pay cash or deliver other property under the 2019 Plan or under other plans or compensatory arrangements, subject to terms determined by our Compensation Committee in a manner that complies with Section 409A of the Code.

Other Awards are subject to the 2019 Plan’s minimum vesting rules. Our Compensation Committee may provide for the payment of dividends or dividend equivalents on Other Awards in cash or in additional common shares, subject to deferral and payment on a contingent basis based on the participant’s earning and vesting of the Other Awards with respect to which such dividends or dividend equivalents are paid.

Change in Control

The 2019 Plan includes a definition of “change in control” that will apply to awards under the 2019 Plan, unless otherwise determined by our Compensation Committee.

Management Objectives

The 2019 Plan provides that any of the awards set forth above may be granted subject to the achievement of specified management objectives. Management objectives are defined as the measurable performance objective or objectives established pursuant to the 2019 Plan for participants

who have received grants of performance shares, performance units or cash incentive awards or, when so determined by our Compensation Committee, other types of awards under the 2019 Plan, all as determined by our Compensation Committee. Additionally, if our Compensation Committee determines that a change in the business, operations, corporate structure or capital structure of the Company, or the manner in which it conducts its business, or other events or circumstances render the management objectives unsuitable, our Compensation Committee may in its discretion modify such management objectives or the goals or actual levels of achievement, in whole or in part, as our Compensation Committee deems appropriate and equitable.

Transferability of Awards

In general, and except as otherwise provided by our Compensation Committee, and subject to the terms of the 2019 Plan, awards under the 2019 Plan will not be transferrable by a participant except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. In no event will any such award granted under the 2019 Plan be transferred for value. Except as otherwise determined by our Compensation Committee, stock options and SARs will be exercisable during the participant’s lifetime only by him or her or, in the event of the participant’s legal incapacity to do so, by his or her guardian or legal representative as described in the 2019 Plan.

Adjustments; Corporate Transactions

Our Compensation Committee will make or provide for such adjustments in: (a) if and as applicable, the number of and kind of common shares covered by, and the exercise price or base price provided under, awards granted pursuant to the 2019 Plan; (b) cash incentive awards; and (c) other award terms, as our Compensation Committee in its good faith discretion determines to be equitably required in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of participants that otherwise would result from certain corporate transactions and events that are described in the 2019 Plan.

Also, in the event of any such transaction or event, or in the event of a change in control of the Company, our Compensation Committee may provide in substitution for any or all outstanding awards under the 2019 Plan such alternative consideration (including cash), if any, as it may in good faith determine to be equitable under the circumstances. In addition, for each stock option or SAR with an exercise price or base price, respectively, greater than the consideration offered in connection with any such transaction or event or change in control of the Company, our Compensation Committee may in its discretion elect to cancel such stock option or SAR without any payment to the person holding such award. Our Compensation Committee will make or provide for such adjustments to the numbers of common shares available under the 2019 Plan and the share limits of the 2019 Plan as our Compensation Committee in its sole discretion may in good faith determine to be appropriate in connection with such transaction or event (subject to applicable limitations described in the 2019 Plan).

Detrimental Activity and Recapture

Any Evidence of Award may reference a clawback policy of the Company or provide for the cancellation or forfeiture and repayment to us of any gain related to an award, or other provisions intended to have a similar effect, upon such terms and conditions as may be determined by our Compensation Committee from time to time, if any participant, either during employment or other service with us or a subsidiary or within a specified period after such employment or service, engages in any detrimental activity, as described in the applicable Evidence of Award or such clawback policy. In addition, any Evidence of Award or such clawback policy may provide for cancellation or forfeiture of an award or the forfeiture and repayment of any common shares issued under and/or any other benefit related to an award, or other provisions intended to have a similar effect, upon such terms and conditions as may be required by our Compensation Committee or under Section 10D of the 1934 Act and any applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC or any national securities exchange or national securities association on which the common shares may be traded.

Withholding

The 2019 Plan includes provisions governing the satisfaction of the Company’s tax and other withholding obligations with respect to awards under the 2019 Plan. Generally, absent other arrangements being made by a participant, if a participant’s benefit is to be received in the form of common shares, unless otherwise determined by our Compensation Committee, we will withhold common shares having a value equal to the amount required to be withheld. When a participant is required to pay the Company an amount required to be withheld, the participant may elect, unless otherwise determined by our Compensation Committee, to satisfy the obligation, in whole or in part, by having withheld, from the shares required to be delivered to the participant, common shares having a value equal to the amount required to be withheld or by delivering to us other common shares held by such participant. In no event will the fair market value of the common shares to be withheld and delivered pursuant to the 2019 Plan exceed the minimum amount required to be withheld, unless (a) an additional amount can be withheld and not result in adverse accounting consequences, (b) such additional withholding amount is authorized by our Compensation Committee, and (c) the total amount withheld does not exceed the participant’s estimated tax obligations attributable to the applicable transaction. Participants will also make such arrangements as the Company may require for the payment of any withholding tax or other obligation that may arise in connection with the disposition of common shares acquired upon the exercise of stock options.

Effective Date of the 2019 Plan

The 2019 Plan will become effective on the date it is approved by the Company’s shareholders.

Amendment and Termination of the 2019 Plan

The Board generally may amend the 2019 Plan from time to time in whole or in part. However, if any amendment, for purposes of applicable stock exchange rules (and except as permitted under the adjustment provisions of the 2019 Plan) must be approved by our shareholders in order to comply with applicable law or the rules of the NYSE (including as described in the 2019 Plan), or, if the common shares are not traded ontheNYSE, the principal national securities exchange upon which the common shares are traded or quoted, all as determined by the Board, then such amendment will be subject to shareholder approval and will not be effective unless and until such approval has been obtained.

Further, subject to the 2019 Plan’s prohibition on repricing and other limitations set forth in the 2019 Plan, our Compensation Committee generally may amend the terms of any award prospectively or retroactively. If permitted by Section 409A of the Code and subject to certain other limitations set forth in the 2019 Plan (but notwithstanding the 2019 Plan’s minimum vesting rules), including in the case of termination of employment or service, or in the case of unforeseeable emergency or other circumstances or in the event of a change in control, our Compensation Committee may in its discretion provide for continued vesting or accelerate the vesting of certain awards granted under the 2019 Plan.

The Board may, in its discretion, terminate the 2019 Plan at any time. Termination of the 2019 Plan will not affect the rights of participants or their successors under any awards outstanding and not exercised in full on the date of termination. No grant will be made under the 2019 Plan on or after the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the 2019 Plan, but all grants made prior to such date will continue in effect thereafter subject to their terms and the terms of the 2019 Plan.

New Plan Benefits

It is not possible to determine specific amounts and types of awards that may be granted in the future under the 2019 Plan because the grant and actual settlement of awards under the 2019 Plan will be discretionary. The 2019 Plan does not mandate set benefits or amounts, and no awards have been granted under the 2019 Plan that are contingent upon shareholder approval.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a brief summary of certain of the federal income tax consequences of certain transactions under the 2019 Plan based on federal income tax laws in effect. This summary, which is presented for the information of shareholders considering how to vote on this proposal and not for 2019 Plan participants, is not intended to be complete and does not describe federal taxes other than income taxes (such as Medicare and Social Security taxes), or state, local or foreign tax consequences.

Tax Consequences to Participants

Restricted Shares

The recipient of restricted shares generally will be subject to tax at ordinary income rates on the fair market value of the restricted shares (reduced by any amount paid by the recipient for such restricted shares) at such time as the restricted shares are no longer subject to forfeiture or restrictions on transfer for purposes of Section 83 of the Code (“Restrictions”). However, a recipient who so elects under Section 83(b) of the Code within 30 days of the date of transfer of the shares will have taxable ordinary income on the date of transfer of the shares equal to the excess of the fair market value of such shares (determined without regard to the Restrictions) over the purchase price, if any, of such restricted shares. If a Section 83(b) election has not been made, any dividends received with respect to restricted shares that are subject to the Restrictions generally will be treated as compensation that is taxable as ordinary income to the recipient.

Performance Shares, Performance Units and Cash Incentive Awards

No income generally will be recognized upon the grant of performance shares, performance units or cash incentive awards. Upon payment in respect of theearn-out of performance shares, performance units or cash incentive awards, the recipient generally will be required to include as taxable ordinary income in the year of receipt an amount equal to the amount of cash received and the fair market value of any unrestricted common shares received.

Nonqualified Stock Options

In general:

no income will be recognized by an optionee at the time anon-qualified stock option is granted;

at the time of exercise of anon-qualified stock option, ordinary income will be recognized by the optionee in an amount equal to the difference between the option price paid for the shares and the fair market value of the shares, if unrestricted, on the date of exercise; and

at the time of sale of shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of anon-qualified stock option, appreciation (or depreciation) in value of the shares after the date of exercise will be treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss) depending on how long the shares have been held.

Incentive Stock Options

No income generally will be recognized by an optionee upon the grant or exercise of an Incentive Stock Option. If common shares are issued to the optionee pursuant to the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option, and if no disqualifying disposition of such shares is made by such optionee within two years after the date of grant or within one year after the transfer of such shares to the optionee, then upon sale of such shares, any amount realized in excess of the option price will be taxed to the optionee as a long-term capital gain and any loss sustained will be a long-term capital loss.

If common shares acquired upon the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option are disposed of prior to the expiration of either holding period described above, the optionee generally will recognize ordinary income in the year of disposition in an amount equal to the excess (if any) of the fair market value of such shares at the time of exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on the disposition of such shares if a sale or exchange) over the exercise price paid for such shares. Any further gain (or loss) realized by the participant generally will be taxed as short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss) depending on the holding period.

SARs

No income will be recognized by a participant in connection with the grant of a SAR. When the SAR is exercised, the participant normally will be required to include as taxable ordinary income in the year of exercise an amount equal to the amount of cash received and the fair market value of any unrestricted common shares received on the exercise.

Restricted Stock Units

No income generally will be recognized upon the award of restricted stock units. The recipient of a restricted stock unit award generally will be subject to tax at ordinary income rates on the fair market value of unrestricted common shares on the date that such shares are transferred to the participant under the award (reduced by any amount paid by the participant for such restricted stock units), and the capital gains/loss holding period for such shares will also commence on such date.

Deferred Shares

No income generally will be recognized upon the award of deferred shares. The participant generally will be subject to tax at ordinary income rates on the fair market value of unrestricted common shares on the date that such shares are transferred to the participant under the award (reduced by any amount paid by the participant for such deferred shares), and the capital gains/loss holding period for such shares will also commence on such date.

Tax Consequences to the Company or its Subsidiaries

To the extent that a participant recognizes ordinary income in the circumstances described above, the Company or the subsidiary for which the participant performs services will be entitled to a corresponding deduction provided that, among other things, the income meets the test of reasonableness, is an ordinary and necessary business expense, is not an “excess parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code and is not disallowed by the $1 million limitation on certain executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Registration with the SEC

We intend to file a Registration Statement on FormS-8 relating to the issuance of common shares under the 2019 Plan with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as soon as practicable after approval of the 2019 Plan by our shareholders

Vote Required for Approval

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is necessary for approval of the 2019 Plan. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted for determining whether this proposal is approved.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR APPROVAL OF THE TIMKEN COMPANY 2019 EQUITY AND INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN.

PROPOSAL NO. 5: SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL – SIMPLE

INDEPENDENT BOARD CHAIRMANMAJORITY VOTE

A shareholder, John Chevedden, whose name, address and share ownership are available upon request as described on page 78,81, has notified the Company of his intention to offer the following proposal for consideration of our shareholders at the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. By including the proposal below in our proxy materials, the Company makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the proponent’s claims or assertions.

Proposal 4 – Simple Majority Vote

LOGO

RESOLVED, Shareholders request that our board take each step necessary so that each voting requirement in our charter and bylaws (that is explicit or implicit due to default to state law) that calls for a greater than simple majority vote be eliminated, and replaced by a requirement for a majority of the votes cast for and against applicable proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws. If necessary this means the closest standard to a majority of the votes cast for and against such proposals consistent with applicable laws. This includes any existing supermajority vote requirement that result from default to state law and can be subject to elimination.

Shareholders request our Boardare willing to pay a premium for shares of Directorscompanies that have excellent corporate governance. Supermajority voting requirements have been found to adopt as a policy,be one of 6 entrenching mechanisms that are negatively related to company performance according to “What Matters in Corporate Governance” by Lucien Bebchuk, Alma Cohen and amend our governing documents as necessary, to require henceforth that the ChairAllen Ferrell of the Board of Directors, whenever possible,Harvard Law School. Supermajority requirements are used to be an independent member of the Board. The Board would have discretion to phase in this policy for the next Chief Executive Officer transition, implemented so it does not violate any existing agreement.

If the Board determines thatblock initiatives supported by most shareowners but opposed by a Chairman, who was independent when selected is no longer independent, the Board shall select a new Chairman who satisfies the requirements of the policy within a reasonable amount of time. Compliance with this policy is waived if no independent director is available and willing to serve as Chairman. This proposal requests that all the necessary steps be taken to accomplish the above.status quo management.

This proposal topic won 50%-plusfrom 74% to 88% support at 5 major U.S. companies in 2013 including 73%-support at Netflix. These 5 majorityWeyerhaeuser, Alcoa, Waste Management, Goldman Sachs, FirstEnergy, McGraw-Hill and Macy’s. The proponents of these proposals included Ray T. Chevedden and William Steiner. The votes would have been still higher than 74% to 88% if allmore shareholders had access to independent proxy voting advice.

An independent board chairman would have more time and incentive to improveCurrently a 2%-minority can frustrate the independence and oversightwill of our Board. For instance Elizabeth Ann Harrell,79%-shareholder majority in an election in which 81% of shares cast ballots. In other words a new director in 2017, had no other major company director experience.

Meanwhile 6 directors had15-2%-minority could have the power to32-years long-tenure on our board – long-tenure which erodes director independence:

John Timken

32-years

John Luke

19-years

Jacqueline Woods

18-years

Ward Timken

16-years

Joseph Ralston

15-years

Frank Sullivan

15-years

These directors, whose independence has eroded, also had a big influence on our most important Board committees – controlling 8 prevent 79% of the 18 positions.

Joseph Ralston, with15-year long-tenure, was Lead Director - inappropriate because the Lead Director position requires a higher level of director independence.

Plus we permanently have no right to elect a director by written consent since Timken is incorporated in Ohio. Written consent often obtains significantshareholders from improving shareholder support in states other than Ohio. For instance a written consent proposal, sponsored by Ray T. Chevedden, won 54% supportrights and management accountability at AT&T.

An independent Chairman is best positioned to build up the oversight capabilities of our directors while our CEO addresses the challengingday-to-day issues facing the company. The roles of Chairman and CEO are fundamentally different and should be held by 2 directors, a CEO and a Chairman who is completely independent.Timken.

Please vote yes:

Independent Board ChairmanSimple Majority Vote - Proposal 54

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL – INDEPENDENT BOARD CHAIRMAN

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSE TO THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEAGAINST THIS

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

This proposal, submitted by John Chevedden, requests that each Company voting requirement in our Articles of Incorporation or Code of Regulations that calls for a greater than simple majority vote (either explicit or implicit due to default state law) be replaced by a majority vote requirement.

After careful consideration, the Board has concluded that this proposal is not in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Accordingly, the Board unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons.

Existing Supermajority Voting Thresholds Apply in Limited Circumstances

A majority of votes cast, or a simple majority, is already the voting standard for most matters voted upon by the Company’s common shareholders. Our existing Board leadership structure and strong corporate governance practices already provide for effective and independent Board oversight. Timken’s Directors have a fiduciary duty to routinely evaluate and determine the Board’s leadership structure based on what will best serve shareholders’ interests under the circumstances, not pursuant to an inflexible policy established in advance. No single, fixed leadership model is appropriateCode of Regulations currently provides that in all circumstances. If this proposal werematters, except as provided by statute or by our Articles of Incorporation or Code of Regulations, a simple majority is the voting standard applicable to be approvedour common shareholders. The express voting standards applicable to our common shareholders in our Articles of Incorporation and implemented, it would depriveCode of Regulations are also simple majority standards. Ohio corporate law, like the Boardcorporate law of important flexibility to utilize its business judgment to determinemost states, does however provide a default voting standard for certain extraordinary matters (requiring the most effective leadership structure to serveaffirmative vote of the interestsholders of at least two-thirds of our outstanding voting securities). Because our organizational documents are otherwise silent on the required voting standard for such extraordinary matters, certain matters, such as a merger or sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets and a voluntary dissolution of the Company, and its shareholders. Moreover, when the proponent put forth substantially the same proposal in 2014, over 73% of the votes cast by our shareholders voted against the proposal.

The Board’s current and preferred leadership structure is to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO. With limited exceptions, these roles have been separate for over 80 years. The Board considers this balance of leadership between the two positions to bewould require a strength for the Company.

The Board recognizes the importance of having in place a structure to ensure that it functions in an appropriately independent manner. With the Board’s appointment of John M. Timken, Jr. to the role of Chairman in 2014, it already adopted a structure that is essentially the same as that requested by this proposal (without unduly depriving the Board of its flexibility). John M. Timken, Jr. meets all of the independence requirements of the NYSE listing standards, and the Board itself has determined that he has no relationships that impair his independence. The last time the Company had anon-independent Chairman, the Board utilized an independent Lead Director. Pursuant to the Board of Directors General Policies and Procedures, the Board maintains the right to appoint an independent Lead Director in the future should circumstances warrant.supermajority vote.

The Board believes that independent oversight involvesretaining the default supermajority voting standards under Ohio law, applicable only in certain limited circumstances, is in the best interests of the Company’s shareholders and the Company. Supermajority voting requirements on fundamental corporate matters help to protect shareholders against self-interested and potentially abusive actions proposed by one or a few large shareholders, who may seek to advance their interests over the interests of the majority of the Company’s shareholders.

The Board believes that in certain limited circumstances, the higher voting requirements are appropriate because certain fundamental matters should require the support of a broad consensus of the Company’s shareholders, rather than a simple majority of the votes present at a meeting. These default supermajority thresholds assist in maximizing long-term value to all shareholders and have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers of our Company that may not be in the best interests of our shareholders and the Company. The Board believes that the limited supermajority requirements the Company has in place are appropriate to maintain the stability of our operations, while striking an appropriate balance that allows for fundamental changes where there is strong shareholder consensus.

Benefits to Shareholders from Supermajority Provisions

Under a simple majority voting standard, where only having an independenta “majority of the votes cast for and against” is required, a few large shareholders would have the power to approve actions that would significantly alter the governance of the Company, including fundamental changes to the Company’s corporate governance structure or operations that could negatively impact the interests of all shareholders. This means a very small group of shareholders could act in their own self-interests and possibly to the detriment of the Company’s other shareholders. Our Board leader, but also showingbelieves that the few heightened voting standards currently existing protect our shareholders against such actions and should not be eliminated.

Because this proposal would eliminate shareholder protections that are in place to maximize long-term value, the Board believes that this proposal is not in the best interests of the Company or its shareholders.

The Board Has Demonstrated a Strong Commitment to Corporate Governance Best Practices

The Board believes that this proposal should be evaluated in the context of the Company’s overall commitment to strong corporate governance whichthat is responsive to the views and concerns of the Company’s shareholders, as evidenced by the following practices:

 

 ·

We have a declassified Board – all of our Directors are elected annually.

·

We have an independent Board Chairman.

· 

The Board is comprised of a substantial majority of independent Directors (9(10 of 11 Director nominees12 Directors are independent).

 

 · 

At each regularly scheduledWe have shown a strong commitment to Board meeting, the independent Directors have the opportunity to meet in executive session. Independent directors use these executive sessions to discuss matters of concern as well as any matter they deem appropriate, including evaluation of senior management, CEOrefreshment and management succession, matters to be included on Board agendas, Board informational needs and Board effectiveness. Following these sessions, the Board’s guidance and feedback is discussed with the CEO and Chairman.diversity:

 

  

The Chairs – and all members –over half of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent Directors. These Chairs review in advance the matters to be discussed and the materials to be providedour Board is comprised of Directors that have been added in the areas covered by their respective committee charters.past decade; and

 

 

Five of 12 Directors are ethnically or gender diverse.

·

We align our Directors’ and executive officers’ interests with those of our shareholders through robust ownership requirements.

·

We have granted our shareholders proxy access with 3/3/20/20 parameters.

· 

All Directors have full accessDirector nominees are evaluated in the same manner by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, without regard to all members of management, other Company employees and outside advisors, so the Chairman is only onesource of the many sourcesnominee recommendation.

·

Our Directors are elected by a majority of information forvotes cast and our Majority Voting Policy requires a Director who fails to receive a majority of the Directors.votes cast in favor of his or her election to submit his or her resignation to the Board.

·

Shareholders holding 25% of the Company’s common shares have the right to call special meetings.

See page 2125 for more details on the Company’s commitment to strong corporate governance.

* * * *

In support of his position, the proponent makes several assertions and intimations with which we do not agree. As indicated above, a substantial majority of our Board is composed of independent Directors (as defined by the NYSE listing standards), which is also true ofall standing committee members and committee Chairs. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee routinely reviews Board and committee composition to help ensure that there is the right balance of experience, competencies and backgrounds to fulfill oversight obligations for our shareholders. As part of that process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly reviews whether any vacancies are expected due to retirement, refreshment or otherwise. Our commitment to refreshment has been demonstrated with the addition of five new independent Directors since 2014. While the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to maintain an appropriate mix of newer Directors who bring fresh perspectives, we believe that it is in the best interests of our Company and its shareholders to retain longer-tenured Directors who have deep knowledge of our global operations and long-term strategy.

The Board believes that adopting a policy to restrict the Board’s discretion in selecting the Chair of the Board would deprive the Board of valuable flexibility to exercise its business judgment in selecting the most qualified and appropriate individual to lead the Board. In light of the substantial independent oversight of management by the Board, the Company’s strong corporate governance practices, and the business success that the Board has fostered and overseen, the Board believes that the simple majority vote standard for certain limited circumstances that would be imposed under this proposal is neither productive nornot in the best interests of the Company or its shareholders.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is necessary for the approval of this proposal. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted for determining whether the resolution is approved.

 

FOR THESE REASONS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT

SHAREHOLDERS VOTEAGAINST THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

OTHER INFORMATION

Admission toParticipation at the Annual Meeting

 

For admissionIn order to attend the Annual Meeting,online-only meeting, you will need to pre-register no later than 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on May 5, 2022. To pre-register for the meeting, please bringfollow these instructions:

Registered Shareholders

If your shares are registered in your name with our transfer agent or you are a participant holding shares in a Timken-sponsored employee savings plan and you wish to attend the virtual meeting, go to www.cesonlineservices.com/tkr22_vm. Please have your Proxy Card or Notice of Annualthe Meeting, of Shareholders (withcontaining your11-digit control number)number, available and follow the instructions to complete your registration request.

Beneficial Shareholders (those holding shares through a stock brokerage account or by a letterbank or other holder of record)

Beneficial shareholders who wish to attend the virtual meeting may pre-register by visiting the website www.cesonlineservices.com/tkr22_vm. Please have available the voting instruction form, notice, or other communication from your broker, ifbank, or other holder of record that sets forth the control number provided to you and follow the instructions to complete your shares are held in street name.registration request.

After pre-registering for the meeting, shareholders will receive a confirmation email with a link and instructions for accessing the virtual Annual Meeting and submitting questions. Shareholders may review the rules of conduct for the virtual meeting or vote during the virtual Annual Meeting by following the instructions available on the meeting website.

Proxy Solicitation

 

The enclosed proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors, and the entire cost of solicitation will be paid by the Company. In addition to solicitation by mail, our officers and other employees, without extra remuneration, may solicit the return of proxies by any means of communication. Brokerage houses, nominees, fiduciaries and other custodians will be requested to forward soliciting material to the beneficial owners of shares held of record by them and will be reimbursed for their expenses. We have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee not to exceed $17,500 plus reasonableout-of-pocket expenses.

How Proxies will be Voted

 

On the record date of February 20, 2019,22, 2022, we had 76,110,07074,787,494 outstanding common shares, each entitled to one vote upon all matters presented to the meeting. The presence in person or by proxy of not less than 50% of such shares shall constitute a quorum for purposes of the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Voting at the Meeting

 

Shares represented by properly executed proxies will be voted at the meeting in accordance with the shareholders’ instructions. In the absence of specific instructions, the shares will be voted FOR all of the Director nominees as indicated under Proposal No. 1, FOR Proposal No. 2, FOR Proposal No. 3 FOR Proposal No. 4, and AGAINST Proposal No. 5.4. The time limits established under our Amended Regulations forNon-Rule14a-8Non-Rule 14a-8 Proposals (as defined below) described under “Submission of Shareholder Proposals” also apply in determining whether notice is timely for purposes of SEC rules relating to the exercise of discretionary voting authority. We do not know of any matters to be brought before the 20192022 Annual Meeting except as indicated in the accompanying Notice of 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and this Proxy Statement.

However, if any other matters properly come before the meeting for action of which we did not have notice on or prior to February 7, 20196, 2022, or that applicable law otherwise permits proxies to vote on a discretionary basis, it is intended that the proxy holders may vote or act thereon in their discretion.

You may revoke your proxy at any time before the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders by a later dated proxy received by us or by giving notice to us either in writing or at the meeting.

Corporate Election Services, Inc. (“CES”) will be responsible for tabulating the results of shareholder voting. CES will submit a total vote only, keeping all individual votes confidential. Representatives of CES will serve as inspectors of election for the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Under Ohio law, our Amended Articles of Incorporation and Amended Regulations, properly executed proxies marked “abstain” and brokernon-votes will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum has been achieved at the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act requires our executive officers and Directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of our common shares, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC, and to provide us with copies of such reports. We are required to disclose any failure by any of the above-mentioned persons to file timely Section 16 reports.

Based solely upon our review of the copies of such reports furnished to us, or written representations that no forms were required to be filed, we are not aware of any instances of noncompliance, or late compliance, with such filings during the year ended December 31, 2018, by our executive officers, Directors, orten-percent shareholders.

Submission of Shareholder Proposals

 

We must receive by November 23, 201918, 2022 any proposal of our shareholders intended to be presented at the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and to be included in our proxy materials related to the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Rule14a-8 under the 1934 Act. Such proposals should be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested. A shareholder submitting a proposal outside the processes of Rule14a-8 under the 1934 Act in connection with the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders(“Non-Rule14a-8Non-Rule 14a-8 Proposals”) must submit written notice of such proposal in accordance with Article I, Sections 12 and 14 of our Amended Regulations. In general, to be timely, a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to or received by our Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary at our principal executive offices not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which the Company held the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders. If the date of the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is scheduled for a date more than 30 days prior to or more than 30 days after the first anniversary of the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, then a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to our Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary at ourprincipalourprincipal executive offices not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is first made. Our proxy related to the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will give discretionary authority to the proxy holders to vote with respect to allNon-Rule

14a-8 Proposals received by us after February 7, 2020.5, 2023. The summaries set forth immediately above are qualified in their entirety by our Amended Regulations and Rule14a-8.

General

 

The SEC permits companies to send a single set of annual disclosure documents to any household at which two or more shareholders reside, unless contrary instructions have been received, but only if we provide advance notice and follow certain procedures. In such cases, such shareholders continue to receive a separate notice of the meeting and proxy card. This “householding” process reduces the volume of duplicate information and reduces printing and mailing expenses. We have not instituted householding for shareholders of record; however, a number of brokerage firms may have instituted householding for beneficial owners of our common shares held through such brokerage firms. If your family has multiple accounts holding common shares, you already may have received a householding notification from your broker. Please contact your broker directly if you have any questions or require additional copies of the annual disclosure documents. The broker will arrange for delivery of a separate copy of this Proxy Statement or our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20182021 promptly upon your written or oral request. You may decide at any time to revoke your decision to household and thereby receive multiple copies.

After April 1, 2019,2022, we will furnish to each shareholder, upon written request and without charge, a copy of our Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, including financial statements and schedules thereto, filed with the SEC. Requests should be addressed to Hansal N. Patel, CorporateVice President, General Counsel & Secretary, The Timken Company, 4500 Mt. Pleasant Street NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720. The name, address and share ownership of the personshareholder submitting the shareholder proposal on page 74,76 may be obtained using the contact information above or by calling234-262-3000.

APPENDIX A

RECONCILIATION  RECONCILIATIONS OF NON-GAAP MEASURES TO MOST DIRECTLY COMPARABLE GAAP TO NON-GAAP MEASURES

(dollars in millions, excluding EPS and Adjusted EPS)

 

Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted Net Income, EBIT and Margin1 2018  2017 2016 

2016

As

Reported6

 

2015

As

Reported6

 

2014

As

Reported6

 
  
Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted Net
Income and EBITDA1
   2021     2020      2019      2018      2017    2016 10
 

Net Sales

 $3,580.8  $3,003.8  $2,669.8  $2,669.8  $2,872.3  $3,076.2   $ 4,132.9  $ 3,513.2   $ 3,789.9   $ 3,580.8   $ 3,003.8   $ 2,669.8

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to The Timken Company

  302.8  203.4  140.8  152.6  (70.8 170.8   $ 369.1  $ 284.5   $ 362.1   $ 302.8   $ 203.4   $ 140.8

Discontinued operations

  -       -       -       -       -      (24.0

Income from Continuing Operations

  302.8  203.4  140.8  152.6  (70.8 146.8 

Impairment, restructuring and reorganization charges2

 15.1 29.0  9.8  7.1  13.1  28.0

Corporate pension and other postretirement benefit related expense (income)3

 0.3 18.5  (4.1)  12.8  18.1  67.0
 

Acquisition related charges

 3.2 3.7  15.5  20.6  9.0  4.2
 

Acquisition-related gain4

 (0.9) (11.1)  -  -  -  -
 

(Gain) loss on divestitures and sale of real estate

 - (0.4)  (4.5)  0.8  (3.6)  (0.5)

Property (recoveries) losses and related expenses5

 - (5.5)  7.6  -  -  -
 

Brazil legal matter

 - -  1.8  -  -  -
 

Tax Indemnification and related items

 0.2 0.5  0.7  1.5  (1.0)  -
 

Health care plan modification costs

 - -  -  -  (0.7)  2.9
 

CDSOA income, net of expense

  -       -      (59.6 (59.6  -       -      - -  -  -  -  (59.6)

Pension related charges2

  12.8  18.1  67.0  28.1  465.0  33.7 

Impairment and restructuring charges3

  7.1  13.1  28.0  28.0  15.9  136.2 

Loss (gain) on divestitures and sale of real estate

  0.8  (3.6 (0.5 (0.5 (28.7 (22.6

Acquisition related charges

  20.6  9.0  4.2  4.2  5.7   -     

Tax Indemnification and related items

  1.5  (1.0  -       -       -       -     

Health care plan modification costs

  -      (0.7 2.9  2.9   -       -     

Fixed assetwrite-off

  -       -       -       -      9.7   -     
 

Noncontrolling interest

  (1.3  -       -       -       -       -      - (0.1)  (0.5)  (1.3)  -  -
 

Provision for income taxes

  (16.8 (30.8 (13.8 0.5  (207.7 (61.2 (23.6) (6.0)  (34.6)  (16.8)  (30.8)  (13.8)
 

Adjusted Net Income

 $327.5  $207.5  $169.0  $156.2  $189.1  $232.9   $ 363.4  $ 313.1   $ 353.8   $ 327.5   $ 207.5   $ 169.0

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest

  2.7  (1.1 0.3  0.3  2.8  2.5  12.4 7.9  12.6  2.7  (1.1)  0.3
 

Provision for income taxes (as reported)

  102.6  57.6  60.5  69.2  (121.6 54.7  95.1 103.9  97.7  102.6  57.6  60.5
 

Interest expense

  51.7  37.1  33.5  33.5  33.4  28.7  58.8 67.6  72.1  51.7  37.1  33.5
 

Interest income

  (2.1 (2.9 (1.9 (1.9 (2.7 (4.4 (2.3) (3.7)  (4.9)  (2.1)  (2.9)  (1.9)
 

Depreciation and amortization expense6

 167.0 164.0  159.9  146.0  135.8  130.2
 

Less: Noncontrolling interest

  (1.3  -       -       -       -       -      - (0.1)  (0.5)  (1.3)  -  -
 

Less: Provision for income taxes

  (16.8 (30.8 (13.8 0.5  (207.7 (61.2 (23.6) (6.0)  (34.6)  (16.8)  (30.8)  (13.8)

Adjusted EBIT

 $500.5  $329.0  $275.2  $256.8  $308.7  $375.6 

Adjusted EBIT Margin (% of net sales)

  14.0%  11.0%  10.3%  9.6%  10.7%  12.2% 
 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $ 718.0  $ 658.9   $ 726.3   $ 646.5   $ 464.8   $ 405.4
             

  
Reconciliation of Diluted EPS to Adjusted EPS1 2018  2017 2016 2016 2015 2014      2021     2020      2019      2018      2017      2016 10

Diluted Earnings per Share (EPS) - Continuing Operations

 $3.86  $2.58  $1.78  $1.92  $(0.84 $1.61 

Adjusted EPS - Continuing Operations

 $4.18  $2.63  $2.13  $1.97  $2.21  $2.55 
 

Diluted Earnings per Share (EPS)

  $ 4.79  $ 3.72   $ 4.71   $ 3.86   $ 2.58   $ 1.78
 

Adjusted EPS

  $ 4.72  $ 4.10   $ 4.60   $ 4.18   $ 2.63   $ 2.13
 

Diluted Shares

  78,337,481  78,911,149  79,234,324  79,234,324  85,346,246  91,224,328  77,006,589 76,401,366  76,896,565  78,337,481  78,911,149  79,234,324

    
           
  
Reconciliation of Adjusted Net Operating Profit after Taxes 2018  2017 2016             2021     2020      2019      2018      
 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $ 718.0  $ 658.9   $ 726.3   $ 646.5    
 

Less: Depreciation and amortization expense6

  $167.0  $164.0   $159.9   $ 146.0    
 

Adjusted EBIT

 $500.5  $329.0  $275.2      $ 551.0  $ 494.9   $ 566.4   $ 500.5    
 

Adjusted tax rate

  26.5%  30.0%  30.5%         24.0%     25.5%      26.5%      26.5%    
 

Calculated income taxes

  132.6  98.7  83.9      $ 132.2  $126.2   $150.1   $132.6    
 

Adjusted net operating profit after taxes (ANOPAT)

 $367.9  $230.3  $191.3      $ 418.8  $ 368.7   $ 416.3   $ 367.9    

    
Reconciliation of Adjusted Invested Capital 2018  2017 2016        

Total debt

 $1,681.6  $962.3  $659.2    

Total equity

  1,642.7  1,474.9  1,310.9    

Invested capital (Total debt + Total equity)

  3,324.3  2,437.2  $1,970.1    

Invested capital(two-point average)

 $2,880.8  $2,203.7  $1,988.1    

    
Calculation of Return on Adjusted Invested Capital4 2018  2017 2016        

ANOPAT

 $367.9  $230.3  $191.3    

Invested capital(two-point average)

  2,880.8  2,203.7  1,988.1    

Return on invested capital

  12.8%  10.5%  9.6%    

      
Reconciliation of Free Cash Flow5 2018            

Net cash provided from operating activities

 $332.5      

Less: capital expenditures

  112.6      

Free cash flow

 $219.9      

      
  Reconciliation of Adjusted Invested Capital     2021     2020      2019      2018      2017   
 

Total debt

 $1,464.9 $1,564.6  $1,730.1  $1,681.6  $962.3                    
 

Total equity

 $2,377.7 $2,225.2  $1,954.8  $1,642.7  $1,474.9  
      

Invested capital (Total debt + Total equity)

 $3,842.6 $3,789.8  $3,684.9  $3,324.3  $2,437.2  
 

Invested capital (two-point average)

 $3,816.2 $3,737.4     $3,504.6  $2,880.8    
               
  Calculation of Return on Adjusted Invested Capital7 2021 2020  2019  2018      
 

ANOPAT

 $418.8 $368.7  $416.3  $367.9    
 

Invested capital (two-point average)

 $3,816.2 $3,737.4  $3,504.6  $2,880.8    
 

Return on invested capital

 11.0%         9.9%        11.9%        12.8%    
          
   
Reconciliation of Free Cash Flow8 2021 2020                                               
 

Net cash provided from operating activities

 $387.3 $577.6        
 

Less: capital expenditures

 $148.3 $121.6        
 

Free cash flow

 $239.0 $456.0        
             
 
Reconciliation of Net Debt9 2021 2020            
 

Short-term debt

 $53.8 $130.7        
 

Long-term debt

 $1,411.1 $1,433.9        
 

Total debt

 $1,464.9 $1,564.6        
 

Less: cash and cash equivalents

 $257.1 $320.3        
 

Net debt

 $1,207.8 $1,244.3        

1Management believes consolidated earnings (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and taxes (EBIT)amortization (EBITDA) is anon-GAAP measure that is useful to investors as it is representative of the Company’s performance and that it is appropriate to compare GAAP net income to consolidated EBIT.EBITDA. Management also believes thatnon-GAAP measures of adjusted EBIT, adjusted EBIT Margin,EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share are useful to investors as they are representative of the Company’s core operations and are used in the management of the business, including decisions concerning the allocation of resources and assessment of performance.

2Pension Impairment, restructuring and reorganization charges (including items recorded in cost of products sold) are related charges represent curtailments, professional fees associated withto: (i) plant closures; (ii) the rationalization of certain plants; (iii) severance related to cost reduction initiatives; and (iv) related depreciation and amortization. The Company reassesses its operating footprint and cost structure periodically, and makes adjustments as needed that result in restructuring charges. However, management believes these actions are not representative of the Company’s core operations.

3 Corporate pensionde-risking and other postretirement benefit related expense (income) primarily represents actuarial gainslosses and losses(gains) that resulted from the remeasurement of pension plan assets and obligations as a result of changes in assumptions. The Company recognizes actuarial gainslosses and losses(gains) through earnings in connection with the annual remeasurement in the fourth quarter, or on an interim basis if specific events trigger a remeasurement. Pension

Corporate pension and other postretirement benefit related chargesexpense (income) also include pension settlement charges.includes curtailments.

34Impairment The acquisition-related gain represents a bargain purchase price gain on the acquisition of the assets of Aurora Bearing Company that closed on November 30, 2020.

5 Property (recoveries) losses and restructuring charges, including items recorded in costrelated expenses represent property loss and related expenses during the periods presented (net of products sold, are related to plant closures,insurance recoveries received) that occurred during the rationalizationfirst quarter of certain plants and severance related to cost reduction initiatives. The Companyre-assesses its operating footprint and makes adjustments as needed that result in restructuring charges. However, management believes these actions are not representative2019 at one of the Company’s core operations.warehouses in Knoxville, Tennessee and during the third quarter of 2019 at one of the Company’s warehouses in Yantai, China.

46 Depreciation and amortization shown excludes depreciation recognized in reorganization charges, if any.

7The Company uses ANOPAT/Average Invested Capital as anon-GAAP ratio that indicates return on invested capital, which is useful to investors as a measure of return on their investment.

58Management believes that free cash flow is anon-GAAP measure that is useful to investors because it is a meaningful indicator of cash generated from operating activities available for the execution of its business strategy.

692014-2016 Management believes Net Debt is an important measure of the Company’s financial position, due to the amount of cash and cash equivalents on hand.

10 2016 results depicted above are as originally reported and prior torevised for the adoption ofmark-to-market accounting.

APPENDIX B

THE TIMKEN COMPANY

2019 EQUITY AND INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

1.        Purpose.The purpose of this Plan is to permit award grants tonon-employee Directors, officers and other employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries, and certain consultants to the Company and its Subsidiaries, and to provide to such persons incentives and rewards for service and/or performance.

2.        Definitions.As used in this Plan:

(a)         “Appreciation Right” means a right granted pursuant toSection 5 of this Plan.

(b)         “Base Price” means the price to be used as the basis for determining the Spread upon the exercise of an Appreciation Right.

(c)         “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(d)         “Cash Incentive Award” means a cash award granted pursuant toSection 9 of this Plan.

(e)         “Change in Control” has the meaning set forth inSection 13 of this Plan.

(f)         “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and the regulations thereunder, as such law and regulations may be amended from time to time.

(g)         “Committee” means the Compensation Committeeof the Board (or its successor(s)), or any other committee of the Board designated by the Board to administer this Plan pursuant toSection 11 of this Plan. In addition, the Board may act on behalf of the Committee with respect to the terms of this Plan regarding any awards granted tonon-employee Directors under this Plan.

(h)         “Common Shares” means the common shares, without par value, of the Company or any security into which such common shares may be changed by reason of any transaction or event of the type referred to inSection 12 of this Plan.

(i)         “Company” means The Timken Company, an Ohio corporation, and its successors.

(j)         “Date of Grant” means the date provided for by the Committee on which a grant of Option Rights, Appreciation Rights, Performance Shares, Performance Units, Cash Incentive Awards, or other awards contemplated bySection 10 of this Plan, or a grant or sale of Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Units, Deferred Shares or other awards contemplated bySection 10 of this Plan, will become effective (which date will not be earlier than the date on which the Committee takes action with respect thereto).

(k)         “Deferral Period” means the period of time during which Deferred Shares are subject to deferral limitations, as provided inSection 8 of this Plan.

(l)         “Deferred Shares” means an award made pursuant toSection 8 of this Plan of the right to receive Common Shares at the end of the applicable Deferral Period.

(m)         “Director” means a member of the Board.

(n)         “Effective Date” means the date this Plan is approved by the Shareholders.

(o)         “Evidence of Award” means an agreement, certificate, resolution or other type or form of writing or other evidence approved by the Committee that sets forth the terms and conditions of the awards granted under this Plan. An Evidence of Award may be in an electronic medium, may be limited to notation on the books and records of the Company and, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, need not be signed by a representative of the Company or a Participant.

(p)         “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, and the rules and regulations thereunder, as such law, rules and regulations may be amended from time to time.

(q)         “Incentive Stock Option” means an Option Right that is intended to qualify as an “incentive stock option” under Section 422 of the Code or any successor provision.

(r)         “Management Objectives” means the measurable performance objective or objectives established pursuant to this Plan for Participants who have received grants of Performance Shares, Performance Units or Cash Incentive Awards or, when so determined by the Committee, Option Rights, Appreciation Rights, Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Units, Deferred Shares, dividend equivalents or other awards pursuant to this Plan. If the Committee determines that a change in the business, operations, corporate structure or capital structure of the Company, or the manner in which it conducts its business, or other events or circumstances render the Management Objectives unsuitable, the Committee may in its discretion modify such Management Objectives or the goals or actual levels of achievement regarding the Management Objectives, in whole or in part, as the Committee deems appropriate and equitable.

(s)         “Market Value per Share” means, as of any particular date, the price per Common Share under the fair market value pricing method adopted by the Committee provided such method is in compliance with the fair market value pricing rules set forth in Section 409A of the Code, which pricing method may include (but is not limited to) (i) the closing price, opening price or average price of a Common Share as reported for the particular date on the New York Stock Exchange or, if the Common Shares are not then listed on the New York Stock Exchange, on any other national securities exchange on which the Common Shares are listed, or if there are no sales on such date, on the next preceding trading day during which a sale occurred, and (ii) if there is no regular public trading market for the Common Shares, the fair market value as determined in good faith by the Committee.

(t)         “Optionee” means the optionee named in an Evidence of Award evidencing an outstanding Option Right.

(u)         “Option Price” means the purchase price payable on exercise of an Option Right.

(v)         “Option Right” means the right to purchase Common Shares upon exercise of an award granted pursuant toSection 4 of this Plan.

(w)         “Participant” means a person who is selected by the Committee to receive benefits under this Plan and who is at the time (i) anon-employee Director, (ii) an officer or other employee of the Company or any Subsidiary, including a person who has agreed to commence serving in such capacity within 90 days of the Date of Grant, (iii) a consultant of the Company or a Subsidiary, or (iv) a person who provides services to the Company or any Subsidiary that are equivalent to those typically provided by an employee;provided,however, that no person may be selected by the Committee as a Participant unless such person satisfies the FormS-8 definition of an “employee.”

(x)         “Performance Period” means, in respect of a Cash Incentive Award, Performance Share or Performance Unit, a period of time established pursuant toSection 9 of this Plan within which the Management Objectives relating to such Cash Incentive Award, Performance Share or Performance Unit are to be achieved.

(y)         “Performance Share” means a bookkeeping entry that records the equivalent of one Common Share awarded pursuant toSection 9 of this Plan.

(z)         “Performance Unit” means a bookkeeping entry awarded pursuant toSection 9 of this Plan that records a unit equivalent to $1.00 or such other value as is determined by the Committee.

(aa)       “Plan” means this The Timken Company 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan, as may be amended or amended and restated from time to time.

(bb)       “Predecessor Plans” means The Timken Company 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan and The Timken Company Long-Term Incentive Plan, in each case including as amended or amended and restated.

(cc)       “Restricted Shares” means Common Shares granted or sold pursuant toSection 6 of this Plan as to which neither the substantial risk of forfeiture nor the prohibition on transfers has expired.

(dd)       “Restricted Stock Units” means an award made pursuant toSection 7 of this Plan of the right to receive Common Shares, cash or a combination thereof at the end of the applicable Restriction Period.

(ee)       “Restriction Period” means the period of time during which Restricted Stock Units are subject to restrictions, as provided inSection 7 of this Plan.

(ff)       “Shareholder” means an individual or entity that owns one or more Common Shares.

(gg)       “Spread” means the excess of the Market Value per Share on the date when an Appreciation Right is exercised over the Base Price provided for with respect to the Appreciation Right.

(hh)       “Subsidiary” means a corporation, company or other entity (i) more than 50% of whose outstanding shares or securities (representing the right to vote for the election of directors or other managing authority) are, or (ii) which does not have outstanding shares or securities (as may be the case in a partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, unincorporated association or other similar entity), but more than 50% of whose ownership interest representing the right generally to make decisions for such other entity is, now or hereafter, owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Company;provided,however, that for purposes of determining whether any person may be a Participant for purposes of any grant of Incentive Stock Options, “Subsidiary” means any corporation in which the Company at the time owns or controls, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the total combined Voting Power represented by all classes of stock issued by such corporation.

(ii)       “Voting Power” means, at any time, the combined voting power of the then-outstanding securities entitled to vote generally in the election of Directors in the case of the Company or members of the board of directors or similar body in the case of another entity.

3.        Shares Available Under this Plan.

(a)        Maximum Shares Available Under this Plan. Subject to adjustment as provided inSection 12 of this Plan and the share counting rules set forth inSection 3(b) of this Plan, the number of Common Shares available under this Plan for awards of (A) Option Rights or Appreciation Rights, (B)

Restricted Shares, (C) Restricted Stock Units, (D) Deferred Shares, (E) Performance Shares or Performance Units, (F) awards contemplated bySection 10 of this Plan, or (G) dividend equivalents paid with respect to awards made under this Plan will not exceed in the aggregate (x) 10,000,000 Common Shares. Such shares may be shares of original issuance or treasury shares or a combination of the foregoing.

(b)        Share Counting Rules.

 

(i)

Subject to the provisions of thisSection 3(b), the aggregate number of Common Shares available underSection 3(a) of this Plan will be reduced by (A) one Common Share for every one Common Share subject to an Option Right or Appreciation Right granted under this Plan, and (B) 3.50 Common Shares for every one Common Share subject to an award other than an Option Right or Appreciation Right granted under this Plan.

(ii)

Except as provided inSection 23 of this Plan, if any award granted under this Plan (in whole or in part) is cancelled or forfeited, expires, is settled for cash, or is unearned, the Common Shares subject to such award will, to the extent of such cancellation, forfeiture, expiration, cash settlement, or unearned amount, again be available underSection 3(a) above.

(iii)

If, after the Effective Date, any Common Shares subject to an award granted under the Predecessor Plans are forfeited, or an award granted under the Predecessor Plans (in whole or in part) is cancelled or forfeited, expires, is settled for cash, or is unearned, the Common Shares subject to such award will, to the extent of such cancellation, forfeiture, expiration, cash settlement, or unearned amount, be available for awards under this Plan.

(iv)

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Plan: (A) Common Shares withheld by the Company, tendered or otherwise used in payment of the Option Price of an Option Right will not be added (or added back, as applicable) to the aggregate number of Common Shares available underSection 3(a) of this Plan; (B) Common Shares withheld by the Company, tendered or otherwise used to satisfy tax withholding will not be added (or added back, as applicable) to the aggregate number of Common Shares available underSection 3(a) of this Plan; (C) Common Shares subject to a share-settled Appreciation Right that are not actually issued in connection with the settlement of such Appreciation Right on the exercise thereof will not be added back to the aggregate number of Common Shares available under Section 3(a) of this Plan; and (D) Common Shares reacquired by the Company on the open market or otherwise using cash proceeds from the exercise of Option Rights will not be added (or added back, as applicable) to the aggregate number of Common Shares available under Section 3(a) of this Plan.

(v)

Any Common Share that becomes available under this Plan under thisSection 3(b) will be added back as (A) one Common Share if such Common Share was subject to an Option Right or Appreciation Right granted under this Plan or an option right or a stock appreciation right granted under a Predecessor Plan, and (B) as 3.50 Common Share(s) if such Common Share was subject to an award granted under this Plan other than an Option Right or an Appreciation Right (or was subject to an

award other than an option right or a stock appreciation right granted under a Predecessor Plan).

LOGO

(vi)

If, under this Plan, a Participant has elected to give up the right to receive compensation in exchange for Common Shares based on fair market value, such Common Shares will not count against the aggregate limit underSection 3(a) of this Plan.

(c)        Limit on Incentive Stock Options. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Plan, and subject to adjustment as provided inSection 12 of this Plan, the aggregate number of Common Shares actually issued or transferred by the Company upon the exercise of Incentive Stock Options will not exceed 10,000,000 Common Shares.

(d)        Non-Employee Director Compensation Limit. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Plan, in no event will anynon-employee Director in any one calendar year be granted compensation for such service having an aggregate maximum value (measured at the Date of Grant as applicable, and calculating the value of any awards based on the grant date fair value for financial reporting purposes) in excess of $650,000.

(e)        Certain Vesting Requirements. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan (outside of thisSection 3(e)) to the contrary, awards granted under this Plan shall vest no earlier than after a minimumone-year vesting period orone-year performance period, as applicable;provided,however, that, notwithstanding the foregoing, an aggregate of up to 5% of the Common Shares available for awards under this Plan as provided for inSection 3 of this Plan, as may be adjusted underSection 12 of this Plan, may be used for awards that do not at grant comply with such minimum vesting provisions. Nothing in thisSection 3(e) or otherwise in this Plan, however, shall preclude the Committee, in is sole discretion, from (i) providing for continued vesting or accelerated vesting for any award under the Plan upon certain events, including in connection with or following a Participant’s death, disability, or termination of service or a Change in Control, or (ii) exercising its authority underSection 19(c) at any time following the grant of an award.

4.        Option Rights.The Committee may, from time to time and upon such terms and conditions as it may determine, authorize the granting to Participants of Option Rights. Each such grant may utilize any or all of the authorizations, and will be subject to all of the requirements, contained in the following provisions:

(a)         Each grant will specify the number of Common Shares to which it pertains subject to the limitations set forth inSection 3 of this Plan.

(b)         Each grant will specify an Option Price per Common Share, which Option Price (except with respect to awards underSection 23 of this Plan) may not be less than the Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant.

(c)         Each grant will specify whether the Option Price will be payable (i) in cash, by check acceptable to the Company or by wire transfer of immediately available funds, (ii) by the actual or constructive transfer to the Company of Common Shares owned by the Optionee having a value at the time of exercise equal to the total Option Price, (iii) subject to any conditions or limitations established by the Committee, by the withholding of Common Shares otherwise issuable upon exercise of an Option Right pursuant to a “net exercise” arrangement (it being understood that, solely for purposes of determining the number of treasury shares held by the Company, the Common Shares so withheld will not be treated as issued and acquired by the Company upon such exercise), (iv) by a combination of such methods of payment, or (v) by such other methods as may be approved by the Committee.

(d)         To the extent permitted by law, any grant may provide for deferred payment of the Option Price from the proceeds of sale through a bank or broker on a date satisfactory to the Company of some or all of the Common Shares to which such exercise relates.

(e)         Each grant will specify the period or periods of continuous service by the Optionee with the Company or any Subsidiary, if any, that is necessary before any Option Rights or installments thereof will vest.

(f)         Any grant of Option Rights may specify Management Objectives regarding the vesting of such rights.

(g)         Option Rights granted under this Plan may be (i) options, including Incentive Stock Options, that are intended to qualify under particular provisions of the Code, (ii) options that are not intended to so qualify, or (iii) combinations of the foregoing. Incentive Stock Options may only be granted to Participants who meet the definition of “employees” under Section 3401(c) of the Code.

(h)         No Option Right will be exercisable more than 10 years from the Date of Grant. The Committee may provide in any Evidence of Award for the automatic exercise of an Option Right upon such terms and conditions as established by the Committee.

(i)         Option Rights granted under this Plan may not provide for any dividends or dividend equivalents thereon.

(j)         Each grant of Option Rights will be evidenced by an Evidence of Award. Each Evidence of Award will be subject to this Plan and will contain such terms and provisions, consistent with this Plan, as the Committee may approve.

5.        Appreciation Rights.

(a)         The Committee may, from time to time and upon such terms and conditions as it may determine, authorize the granting to any Participant of Appreciation Rights. An Appreciation Right will be the right of the Participant to receive from the Company an amount determined by the Committee, which will be expressed as a percentage of the Spread (not exceeding 100%) at the time of exercise.

(b)         Each grant of Appreciation Rights may utilize any or all of the authorizations, and will be subject to all of the requirements, contained in the following provisions:

(i)

Each grant may specify that the amount payable on exercise of an Appreciation Right will be paid by the Company in cash, Common Shares or any combination thereof.

(ii)

Each grant will specify the period or periods of continuous service by the Participant with the Company or any Subsidiary, if any, that is necessary before the Appreciation Rights or installments thereof will vest.

(iii)

Any grant of Appreciation Rights may specify Management Objectives regarding the vesting of such Appreciation Rights.

(iv)

Appreciation Rights granted under this Plan may not provide for any dividends or dividend equivalents thereon.

(v)

Each grant of Appreciation Rights will be evidenced by an Evidence of Award. Each Evidence of Award will be subject to this Plan and will contain such terms and provisions, consistent with this Plan, as the Committee may approve.

(c)         Also, regarding Appreciation Rights:

(i)

Each grant will specify in respect of each Appreciation Right a Base Price, which (except with respect to awards underSection 23 of this Plan) may not be less than the Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant; and

(ii)

No Appreciation Right granted under this Plan may be exercised more than 10 years from the Date of Grant. The Committee may provide in any Evidence of Award for the automatic exercise of an Appreciation Right upon such terms and conditions as established by the Committee.

6.        Restricted Shares. The Committee may, from time to time and upon such terms and conditions as it may determine, authorize the grant or sale of Restricted Shares to Participants. Each such grant or sale may utilize any or all of the authorizations, and will be subject to all of the requirements, contained in the following provisions:

(a)         Each such grant or sale will constitute an immediate transfer of the ownership of Common Shares to the Participant in consideration of the performance of services, entitling such Participant to voting, dividend and other ownership rights, but subject to the substantial risk of forfeiture and restrictions on transfer hereinafter described.

(b)         Each such grant or sale may be made without additional consideration or in consideration of a payment by such Participant that is less than the Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant.

(c)         Each such grant or sale will provide that the Restricted Shares covered by such grant or sale will be subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture” within the meaning of Section 83 of the Code for a period to be determined by the Committee on the Date of Grant or until achievement of Management Objectives referred to inSection 6(e) of this Plan.

(d)         Each such grant or sale will provide that during or after the period for which such substantial risk of forfeiture is to continue, the transferability of the Restricted Shares will be prohibited or restricted in the manner and to the extent prescribed by the Committee on the Date of Grant (which restrictions may include rights of repurchase or first refusal of the Company or provisions subjecting the Restricted Shares to a continuing substantial risk of forfeiture while held by any transferee).

(e)         Any grant of Restricted Shares may specify Management Objectives regarding the vesting of such Restricted Shares.

(f)         Any such grant or sale of Restricted Shares may require that any and all dividends or other distributions paid thereon during the period of such restrictions be automatically deferred and/or reinvested in additional Restricted Shares, which will be subject to the same restrictions as the underlying award. For the avoidance of doubt, any such dividends or other distributions on Restricted Shares will be deferred until, and paid contingent upon, the vesting of such Restricted Shares.

(g)         Each grant or sale of Restricted Shares will be evidenced by an Evidence of Award. Each Evidence of Award will be subject to this Plan and will contain such terms and provisions, consistent with this Plan, as the Committee may approve. Unless otherwise directed by the Committee, (i) all certificates representing Restricted Shares will be held in custody by the Company until all restrictions thereon will have lapsed, together with a stock power or powers executed by the Participant in whose name such certificates are registered, endorsed in blank and covering such shares or (ii) all Restricted Shares will be held at the Company’s transfer agent in book entry form with appropriate restrictions relating to the transfer of such Restricted Shares.

7.        Restricted Stock Units. The Committee may, from time to time and upon such terms and conditions as it may determine, authorize the granting or sale of Restricted Stock Units to Participants. Each such grant or sale may utilize any or all of the authorizations, and will be subject to all of the requirements, contained in the following provisions:

(a)         Each such grant or sale will constitute the agreement by the Company to deliver Common Shares or cash, or a combination thereof, to the Participant in the future in consideration of the performance of services, but subject to the fulfillment of such conditions (which may include achievement regarding Management Objectives) during the Restriction Period as the Committee may specify.

(b)         Each such grant or sale may be made without additional consideration or in consideration of a payment by such Participant that is less than the Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant.

(c)         During the Restriction Period, the Participant will have no right to transfer any rights under his or her award and will have no rights of ownership in the Common Shares deliverable upon payment of the Restricted Stock Units and will have no right to vote them, but the Committee may, at or after the Date of Grant, authorize the payment of dividend equivalents on such Restricted Stock Units on a deferred and contingent basis, either in cash or in additional Common Shares;provided,however, that dividend equivalents or other distributions on Common Shares underlying Restricted Stock Units will be deferred until and paid contingent upon the vesting of such Restricted Stock Units.

(d)         Each grant or sale of Restricted Stock Units will specify the time and manner of payment of the Restricted Stock Units that have been earned. Each grant or sale will specify that the amount payable with respect thereto will be paid by the Company in Common Shares or cash, or a combination thereof.

(e)         Each grant or sale of Restricted Stock Units will be evidenced by an Evidence of Award. Each Evidence of Award will be subject to this Plan and will contain such terms and provisions, consistent with this Plan, as the Committee may approve.

8.        Deferred Shares.The Committee may, from time to time and upon such terms and conditions as it may determine, authorize the granting or sale of Deferred Shares to Participants. Each such grant or sale may utilize any or all of the authorizations, and will be subject to all of the requirements, contained in the following provisions:

(a)         Each such grant or sale will constitute the agreement by the Company to issue or transfer Common Shares to the Participant in the future in consideration of the performance of services, but subject to the fulfillment of such conditions (which may include achievement regarding Management Objectives) during the Deferral Period as the Committee may specify.

(b)         Each such grant or sale may be made without additional consideration or in consideration of a payment by such Participant that is less than the Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant.

(c)         Each such grant or sale will provide that the Deferred Shares covered by such grant or sale will be subject to a Deferral Period to be determined by the Committee on the Date of Grant or until Management Objectives are achieved.

(d)         During the Deferral Period, the Participant will have no right to transfer any rights under his or her award, will have no rights of ownership in the Deferred Shares and will have no right to vote them, but the Committee may, at or after the Date of Grant, authorize the payment of dividend equivalents on such Deferred Shares on a deferred and contingent basis, either in cash or in additional Deferred Shares;provided,however, that dividend equivalents or other distributions on Deferred Shares will be deferred until and paid contingent upon the earning and vesting of such Deferred Shares.

(e)         Each grant or sale of Deferred Shares will be evidenced by an Evidence of Award. Each Evidence of Award will be subject to this Plan and will contain such terms and provisions, consistent with this Plan, as the Committee may approve.

(f)         Each grant or sale of Deferred Shares will specify the time and manner of payment of the Deferred Shares that have been earned. Each grant or sale will specify that the amount payable with respect thereto will be paid by the Company in Common Shares or cash, or a combination thereof.

9.        Cash Incentive Awards, Performance Shares and Performance Units. The Committee may, from time to time and upon such terms and conditions as it may determine, authorize the granting of Cash Incentive Awards, Performance Shares and Performance Units. Each such grant may utilize any or all of the authorizations, and will be subject to all of the requirements, contained in the following provisions:

(a)         Each grant will specify the number or amount of Performance Shares or Performance Units, or amount payable with respect to a Cash Incentive Award, to which it pertains, which number or amount may be subject to adjustment to reflect changes in compensation or other factors.

(b)         The Performance Period with respect to each Cash Incentive Award or grant of Performance Shares or Performance Units will be such period of time as will be determined by the Committee.

(c)         Each grant of a Cash Incentive Award, Performance Shares or Performance Units will specify Management Objectives regarding the earning of the award.

(d)         Each grant will specify the time and manner of payment of a Cash Incentive Award, Performance Shares or Performance Units that have been earned.

(e)         The Committee may, on the Date of Grant of Performance Shares or Performance Units, provide for the payment of dividend equivalents to the holder thereof either in cash or in additional Common Shares, which dividend equivalents will be subject to deferral and payment on a contingent basis based on the Participant’s earning and vesting of the Performance Shares or Performance Units, as applicable, with respect to which such dividend equivalents are paid.

(f)         Each grant of a Cash Incentive Award, Performance Shares or Performance Units will be evidenced by an Evidence of Award. Each Evidence of Award will be subject to this Plan and will contain such terms and provisions, consistent with this Plan, as the Committee may approve.

10.        Other Awards.

(a)         Subject to applicable law and the applicable limits set forth inSection 3 of this Plan, the Committee may authorize the grant to any Participant of Common Shares or such other awards that may be denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, or related to, Common Shares or factors that may influence the value of such shares, including, without limitation, convertible or exchangeable debt securities, other rights convertible or exchangeable into Common Shares, purchase rights for Common Shares, awards with value and payment contingent upon performance of the Company or specified Subsidiaries, affiliates or other business units thereof or any other factors designated by the Committee, and awards valued by reference to the book value of the Common Shares or the value of securities of, or the performance of specified Subsidiaries or affiliates or other business units of the Company. The Committee will determine the terms and conditions of such awards. Common Shares delivered pursuant to an award in the nature of a purchase right granted under thisSection 10 will be purchased for such consideration, paid for at such time, by such methods, and in such forms, including, without limitation, Common Shares, other awards, notes or other property, as the Committee determines.

(b)         Cash awards, as an element of or supplement to any other award granted under this Plan, may also be granted pursuant to thisSection 10.

(c)         The Committee may authorize the grant of Common Shares as a bonus, or may authorize the grant of other awards in lieu of obligations of the Company or a Subsidiary to pay cash or deliver other property under this Plan or under other plans or compensatory arrangements, subject to such terms as will be determined by the Committee in a manner that complies with Section 409A of the Code.

(d)         The Committee may, at or after the Date of Grant, authorize the payment of dividends or dividend equivalents on awards granted under thisSection 10 on a deferred and contingent basis, either in cash or in additional Common Shares;provided,however, that dividend equivalents or other distributions on Common Shares underlying awards granted under thisSection 10 will be deferred until and paid contingent upon the earning and vesting of such awards.

(e)         Each grant of an award under thisSection 10 will be evidenced by an Evidence of Award. Each such Evidence of Award will be subject to this Plan and will contain such terms and provisions, consistent with this Plan, as the Committee may approve, and will specify the time and terms of delivery of the applicable award.

11.        Administration of this Plan.

(a)         This Plan will be administered by the Committee. The Committee may from time to time delegate all or any part of its authority under this Plan to a subcommittee thereof. To the extent of any such delegation, references in this Plan to the Committee will be deemed to be references to such subcommittee.

(b)         The interpretation and construction by the Committee of any provision of this Plan or of any Evidence of Award (or related documents) and any determination by the Committee pursuant to any provision of this Plan or of any such agreement, notification or document will be final and conclusive. No member of the Committee shall be liable for any such action or determination made in good faith. In addition, the Committee is authorized to take any action it determines in its sole discretion to be appropriate subject only to the express limitations contained in this Plan, and no authorization in any Plan section or other provision of this Plan is intended or may be deemed to constitute a limitation on the authority of the Committee.

(c)         To the extent permitted by law, the Committee may delegate to one or more of its members, to one or more officers of the Company, or to one or more agents or advisors, such administrative duties or powers as it may deem advisable, and the Committee, the subcommittee, or any person to whom duties or powers have been delegated as aforesaid, may employ one or more persons to render advice with respect to any responsibility the Committee, the subcommittee or such person may have under this Plan. The Committee may, by resolution, authorize one or more officers of the Company to do one or both of the following on the same basis as the Committee: (i) designate employees to be recipients of awards under this Plan; and (ii) determine the size of any such awards;provided,however, that (A) the Committee will not delegate such responsibilities to any such officer for awards granted to an employee who is an officer, Director, or more than 10% “beneficial owner” (as such term is defined in Rule13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of any class of the Company’s equity securities that is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, as determined by the Committee in accordance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act; (B) the resolution providing for such authorization shall set forth the total number of Common Shares such officer(s) may grant; and (C) the officer(s) will report periodically to the Committee regarding the nature and scope of the awards granted pursuant to the authority delegated.

12.        Adjustments. The Committee shall make or provide for such adjustments in the number of and kind of Common Shares covered by outstanding Option Rights, Appreciation Rights, Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Units, Deferred Shares, Performance Shares and Performance Units granted hereunder and, if applicable, in the number of and kind of Common Shares covered by other awards

granted pursuant toSection 10 of this Plan, in the Option Price and Base Price provided in outstanding Option Rights and Appreciation Rights, respectively, in Cash Incentive Awards, and in other award terms, as the Committee, in its sole discretion, exercised in good faith, determines is equitably required to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants that otherwise would result from (a) any extraordinary cash dividend, stock dividend, stock split, combination of shares, recapitalization or other change in the capital structure of the Company, (b) any merger, consolidation,spin-off,split-off,spin-out,split-up, reorganization, partial or complete liquidation or other distribution of assets, issuance of rights or warrants to purchase securities, or (c) any other corporate transaction or event having an effect similar to any of the foregoing. Moreover, in the event of any such transaction or event or in the event of a Change in Control, the Committee may provide in substitution for any or all outstanding awards under this Plan such alternative consideration (including cash), if any, as it, in good faith, may determine to be equitable in the circumstances and shallrequire in connection therewith the surrender of all awards so replaced in a manner that complies with Section 409A of the Code. In addition, for each Option Right or Appreciation Right with an Option Price or Base Price, respectively, greater than the consideration offered in connection with any such transaction or event or Change in Control, the Committee may in its discretion elect to cancel such Option Right or Appreciation Right without any payment to the person holding such Option Right or Appreciation Right. The Committee shall also make or provide for such adjustments in the number of Common Shares specified inSection 3 of this Plan as the Committee in its sole discretion, exercised in good faith, determines is appropriate to reflect any transaction or event described in thisSection 12;provided,however, that any such adjustment to the number specified inSection 3(c) of this Plan will be made only if and to the extent that such adjustment would not cause any Option Right intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option to fail to so qualify.

13.        Change in Control. For purposes of this Plan, except as may be otherwise prescribed by the Committee in an Evidence of Award made under this Plan, “Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:

(a)         the acquisition by any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act (a “Person”) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 30% or more of either: (i) the then-outstanding Common Shares or (ii) the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (“Voting Shares”);provided,however, that for purposes of this subsection (a), the following acquisitions shall not constitute a Change in Control: (1) any acquisition directly from the Company, (2) any acquisition by the Company, (3) any acquisition by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any Subsidiary, or (4) any acquisition by any Person pursuant to a transaction which complies with clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of subsection (c); or

(b)         individuals who, as of the Effective Date, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason (other than death or disability) to constitute at least a majority of the Board;provided,however, that any individual becoming a Director subsequent to the Effective Date whose election, or nomination for election by the Shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the Directors then comprising the Incumbent Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee for Director, without objection to such nomination) shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal of Directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board; or

(c)         consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company (a “Business Combination”), in each case, unless, following such Business Combination, (i) all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners, respectively of the Common Shares and Voting Shares immediately prior to such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than66-2/3% of, respectively, the then-outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of the entity

resulting from such Business Combination (including, without limitation, an entity which as a result of such transaction owns the Company or all or substantially all of the Company’s assets either directly or through one or more subsidiaries) in substantially the same proportions relative to each other as their ownership, immediately prior to such Business Combination, of the Common Shares and Voting Shares of the Company, as the case may be, (ii) no Person (excluding any entity resulting from such Business Combination or any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or such entity resulting from such Business Combination) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 30% or more of, respectively, the then-outstanding shares of common stock of the entity resulting from such Business Combination, or the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities of such corporation except to the extent that such ownership existed prior to the Business Combination, and (iii) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement, or of the action of the Board, providing for such Business Combination; or

(d)         approval by the Shareholders of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any award under the Plan that is characterized as“non-qualified deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, an event shall not be considered to be a Change in Control under the Plan for purposes of any payment in respect of such award unless such event would also constitute a “change in ownership,” a “change in effective control” or a “change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of” the Company under Section 409A of the Code.

14.        Detrimental Activity and Recapture Provisions. Any Evidence of Award may reference a clawback policy of the Company or provide for the cancellation or forfeiture of an award or the forfeiture and repayment to the Company of any gain related to an award, or other provisions intended to have a similar effect, upon such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Committee from time to time, if a Participant, either (a) during employment or other service with the Company or a Subsidiary, or (b) within a specified period after termination of such employment or service, engages in any detrimental activity, as described in the applicable Evidence of Award or such clawback policy. In addition, notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, any Evidence of Award or such clawback policy may also provide for the cancellation or forfeiture of an award or the forfeiture and repayment to the Company of any Common Shares issued under and/or any other benefit related to an award, or other provisions intended to have a similar effect, upon such terms and conditions as may be required by the Committee or under Section 10D of the Exchange Act and any applicable rules or regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission or any national securities exchange or national securities association on which the Common Shares may be traded.

15.        Non-U.S. Participants. In order to facilitate the making of any grant or combination of grants under this Plan, the Committee may provide for such special terms for awards to Participants who are foreign nationals or who are employed by the Company or any Subsidiary outside of the United States of America or who provide services to the Company or any Subsidiary under an agreement with a foreign nation or agency, as the Committee may consider necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in local law, tax policy or custom. Moreover, the Committee may approve such supplements to or amendments, restatements or alternative versions of this Plan (includingsub-plans) (to be considered part of this Plan) as it may consider necessary or appropriate for such purposes, without thereby affecting the terms of this Plan as in effect for any other purpose, and the secretary or other appropriate officer of the Company may certify any such document as having been approved and adopted in the same manner as this Plan. No such special terms, supplements, amendments or restatements, however, will include any provisions that are inconsistent with the terms of this Plan as then in effect unless this Plan could have been amended to eliminate such inconsistency without further approval by the Shareholders.

16.        Transferability.

(a)         Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, and subject to compliance withSection 18(b) of this Plan and Section 409A of the Code, no Option Right, Appreciation Right, Restricted Share, Restricted Stock Unit, Deferred Share, Performance Share, Performance Unit, Cash Incentive Award, award contemplated bySection 10 of this Plan or dividend equivalents paid with respect to awards made under this Plan will be transferable by the Participant except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. In no event will any such award granted under this Plan be transferred for value. Where transfer is permitted, references to “Participant” shall be construed, as the Committee deems appropriate, to include any permitted transferee to whom such award is transferred. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, Option Rights and Appreciation Rights will be exercisable during the Participant’s lifetime only by him or her or, in the event of the Participant’s legal incapacity to do so, by his or her guardian or legal representative acting on behalf of the Participant in a fiduciary capacity under state law or court supervision.

(b)         The Committee may specify on the Date of Grant that part or all of the Common Shares that are (i) to be issued or transferred by the Company upon the exercise of Option Rights or Appreciation Rights, upon the termination of the Restriction Period applicable to Restricted Stock Units, upon the termination of the Deferral Period applicable to Deferred Shares or upon payment under any grant of Performance Shares or Performance Units or (ii) no longer subject to the substantial risk of forfeiture and restrictions on transfer referred to inSection 6 of this Plan, will be subject to further restrictions on transfer, including minimum holding periods.

17.        Withholding Taxes. To the extent that the Company is required to withhold federal, state, local or foreign taxes or other amounts in connection with any payment made or benefit realized by a Participant or other person under this Plan, and the amounts available to the Company for such withholding are insufficient, it will be a condition to the receipt of such payment or the realization of such benefit that the Participant or such other person make arrangements satisfactory to the Company for payment of the balance of such taxes or other amounts required to be withheld, which arrangements (in the discretion of the Committee) may include relinquishment of a portion of such benefit. If a Participant’s benefit is to be received in the form of Common Shares, and such Participant fails to make arrangements for the payment of taxes or other amounts, then, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the Company will withhold Common Shares having a value equal to the amount required to be withheld. Notwithstanding the foregoing, when a Participant is required to pay the Company an amount required to be withheld under applicable income, employment, tax or other laws, the Participant may elect, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, to satisfy the obligation, in whole or in part, by having withheld, from the Common Shares required to be delivered to the Participant, Common Shares having a value equal to the amount required to be withheld or by delivering to the Company other Common Shares held by such Participant. The Common Shares used for tax or other withholding will be valued at an amount equal to the fair market value of such Common Shares on the date the benefit is to be included in Participant’s income. In no event will the fair market value of the Common Shares to be withheld and delivered pursuant to thisSection 17 exceed the minimum amount required to be withheld, unless (i) an additional amount can be withheld and not result in adverse accounting consequences, (ii) such additional withholding amount is authorized by the Committee, and (iii) the total amount withheld does not exceed the Participant’s estimated tax obligations attributable to the applicable transaction. Participants will also make such arrangements as the Company may require for the payment of any withholding tax or other obligation that may arise in connection with the disposition of Common Shares acquired upon the exercise of Option Rights.

18.        Compliance with Section 409A of the Code.

(a)         To the extent applicable, it is intended that this Plan and any grants made hereunder comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, so that the income inclusion provisions of Section 409A(a)(1) of the Code do not apply to the Participants. This Plan and any grants made hereunder will be administered in a manner consistent with this intent. Any reference in this Plan to

Section 409A of the Code will also include any regulations or any other formal guidance promulgated with respect to such section by the U.S. Department of the Treasury or the Internal Revenue Service.

(b)         Neither a Participant nor any of a Participant’s creditors or beneficiaries will have the right to subject any deferred compensation (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) payable under this Plan and grants hereunder to any anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, attachment or garnishment. Except as permitted under Section 409A of the Code, any deferred compensation (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) payable to a Participant or for a Participant’s benefit under this Plan and grants hereunder may not be reduced by, or offset against, any amount owed by a Participant to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.

(c)         If, at the time of a Participant’s separation from service (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code), (i) the Participant will be a specified employee (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code and using the identification methodology selected by the Company from time to time) and (ii) the Company makes a good faith determination that an amount payable hereunder constitutes deferred compensation (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) the payment of which is required to be delayed pursuant to thesix-month delay rule set forth in Section 409A of the Code in order to avoid taxes or penalties under Section 409A of the Code, then the Company will not pay such amount on the otherwise scheduled payment date but will instead pay it, without interest, on the tenth business day of the seventh month after such separation from service.

(d)         Solely with respect to any award that constitutes nonqualified deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code and that is payable on account of a Change in Control (including any installments or stream of payments that are accelerated on account of a Change in Control), a Change in Control shall occur only if such event also constitutes a “change in the ownership,” “change in effective control,” and/or a “change in the ownership of a substantial portion of assets” of the Company as those terms are defined under Treasury Regulation§1.409A-3(i)(5), but only to the extent necessary to establish a time and form of payment that complies with Section 409A of the Code, without altering the definition of Change in Control for any purpose in respect of such award.

(e)         Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan and grants hereunder to the contrary, in light of the uncertainty with respect to the proper application of Section 409A of the Code, the Company reserves the right to make amendments to this Plan and grants hereunder as the Company deems necessary or desirable to avoid the imposition of taxes or penalties under Section 409A of the Code. In any case, a Participant will be solely responsible and liable for the satisfaction of all taxes and penalties that may be imposed on a Participant or for a Participant’s account in connection with this Plan and grants hereunder (including any taxes and penalties under Section 409A of the Code), and neither the Company nor any of its affiliates will have any obligation to indemnify or otherwise hold a Participant harmless from any or all of such taxes or penalties.

19.        Amendments.

(a)         The Board may at any time and from time to time amend this Plan in whole or in part;provided,however, that if an amendment to this Plan, for purposes of applicable stock exchange rules and except as permitted underSection 12 of this Plan, (i) would materially increase the benefits accruing to Participants under this Plan, (ii) would materially increase the number of securities which may be issued under this Plan, (iii) would materially modify the requirements for participation in this Plan, or (iv) must otherwise be approved by the Shareholders in order to comply with applicable law or the rules of the New York Stock Exchange or, if the Common Shares are not traded on the New York Stock Exchange, the principal national securities exchange upon which the Common Shares are traded or quoted, all as determined by the Board, then, such amendment will be subject to Shareholder approval and will not be effective unless and until such approval has been obtained.

(b)         Except in connection with a corporate transaction or event described inSection 12 of this Plan or in connection with a Change in Control, the terms of outstanding awards may not be amended to reduce the Option Price of outstanding Option Rights or the Base Price of outstanding

Appreciation Rights, or cancel outstanding “underwater” Option Rights or Appreciation Rights (including following a Participant’s voluntary surrender of “underwater” Option Rights or Appreciation Rights) in exchange for cash, other awards or Option Rights or Appreciation Rights with an Option Price or Base Price, as applicable, that is less than the Option Price of the original Option Rights or Base Price of the original Appreciation Rights, as applicable, without Shareholder approval. ThisSection 19(b) is intended to prohibit the repricing of “underwater” Option Rights and Appreciation Rights and will not be construed to prohibit the adjustments provided for inSection 12 of this Plan. Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, thisSection 19(b) may not be amended without approval by the Shareholders.

(c)         If permitted by Section 409A of the Code, but subject to the paragraph that follows, notwithstanding the Plan’s minimum vesting requirements, and including in the case of termination of employment or service, or in the case of unforeseeable emergency or other circumstances or in the event of a Change in Control, to the extent a Participant holds an Option Right or Appreciation Right not immediately exercisable in full, or any Restricted Shares as to which the substantial risk of forfeiture or the prohibition or restriction on transfer has not lapsed, or any Restricted Stock Units as to which the Restriction Period has not been completed, or any Deferred Shares as to which the Deferral Period has not been completed, or any Cash Incentive Awards, Performance Shares or Performance Units which have not been fully earned, or any dividend equivalents or other awards made pursuant toSection 10 of this Plan subject to any vesting schedule or transfer restriction, or who holds Common Shares subject to any transfer restriction imposed pursuant toSection 16(b) of this Plan, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, provide for continued vesting or accelerate the time at which such Option Right, Appreciation Right or other award may vest or be exercised or the time at which such substantial risk of forfeiture or prohibition or restriction on transfer will lapse or the time when such Restriction Period will end or the time when such Deferral Period will end or the time at which such Cash Incentive Awards, Performance Shares or Performance Units will be deemed to have been earned or the time when such transfer restriction will terminate or may waive any other limitation or requirement under any such award.

(d)         Subject toSection 19(b) of this Plan, the Committee may amend the terms of any award theretofore granted under this Plan prospectively or retroactively. Except for adjustments made pursuant toSection 12 of this Plan, no such amendment will materially impair the rights of any Participant without his or her consent. The Board may, in its discretion, terminate this Plan at any time. Termination of this Plan will not affect the rights of Participants or their successors under any awards outstanding hereunder and not exercised in full on the date of termination.

20.        Governing Law. This Plan and all grants and awards and actions taken hereunder will be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal substantive laws of the State of Ohio.

21.        Effective Date/Termination. This Plan will be effective as of the Effective Date. No grants will be made on or after the Effective Date under the Predecessor Plans, provided that outstanding awards granted under the Predecessor Plans will continue unaffected following the Effective Date. No grant will be made under this Plan on or after the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date, but all grants made prior to such date will continue in effect thereafter subject to the terms thereof and of this Plan. For clarification purposes, the terms and conditions of this Plan shall not apply to or otherwise impact previously granted and outstanding awards under the Predecessor Plans, as applicable.

22.        Miscellaneous Provisions.

(a)         The Company will not be required to issue any fractional Common Shares pursuant to this Plan. The Committee may provide for the elimination of fractions or for the settlement of fractions in cash.

(b)         This Plan will not confer upon any Participant any right with respect to continuance of employment or other service with the Company or any Subsidiary, nor will it interfere in any way with any right the Company or any Subsidiary would otherwise have to terminate such Participant’s employment or other service at any time.

(c)         Except with respect toSection 22(e) of this Plan, to the extent that any provision of this Plan would prevent any Option Right that was intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option from qualifying as such, that provision will be null and void with respect to such Option Right. Such provision, however, will remain in effect for other Option Rights and there will be no further effect on any provision of this Plan.

(d)         No award under this Plan may be exercised by the holder thereof if such exercise, and the receipt of cash or shares thereunder, would be, in the opinion of counsel selected by the Company, contrary to law or the regulations of any duly constituted authority having jurisdiction over this Plan.

(e)         Absence on leave approved by a duly constituted officer of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries will not be considered interruption or termination of service of any employee for any purposes of this Plan or awards granted hereunder.

(f)         No Participant will have any rights as a Shareholder with respect to any Common Shares subject to awards granted to him or her under this Plan prior to the date as of which he or she is actually recorded as the holder of such Common Shares upon the share records of the Company.

(g)         The Committee may condition the grant of any award or combination of awards authorized under this Plan on the surrender or deferral by the Participant of his or her right to receive a cash bonus or other compensation otherwise payable by the Company or a Subsidiary to the Participant.

(h)         Except with respect to Option Rights and Appreciation Rights, the Committee may permit Participants to elect to defer the issuance of Common Shares under this Plan pursuant to such rules, procedures or programs as it may establish for purposes of this Plan and which are intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. The Committee also may provide that deferred issuances and settlements include the crediting of dividend equivalents or interest on the deferral amounts.

(i)         If any provision of this Plan is or becomes invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, or would disqualify this Plan or any award under any law deemed applicable by the Committee, such provision will be construed or deemed amended or limited in scope to conform to applicable laws or, in the discretion of the Committee, it will be stricken and the remainder of this Plan will remain in full force and effect. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan or an Evidence of Award to the contrary, nothing in this Plan or in an Evidence of Award prevents a Participant from providing, without prior notice to the Company, information to governmental authorities regarding possible legal violations or otherwise testifying or participating in any investigation or proceeding by any governmental authorities regarding possible legal violations, and for purpose of clarity a Participant is not prohibited from providing information voluntarily to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 21F of the Exchange Act.

23.        Share-Based Awards in Substitution for Awards Granted by Another Company. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary:

(a)         Awards may be granted under this Plan in substitution for or in conversion of, or in connection with an assumption of, stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, deferred shares or other share or share-based awards held by awardees of an entity engaging in a corporate acquisition or merger transaction with the Company or any Subsidiary. Any conversion, substitution or assumption will be effective as of the close of the merger or acquisition, and, to the extent applicable, will be conducted in a manner that complies with Section 409A of the Code. The awards so granted may reflect the original terms of the awards being assumed or substituted or converted for and need not comply with other specific terms of this Plan, and may account for Common Shares substituted for the securities covered by the original awards and the number of shares subject to the original awards, as well as any exercise or purchase prices applicable to the original awards, adjusted to account for differences in stock prices in connection with the transaction.

(b)         In the event that a company acquired by the Company or any Subsidiary or with which the Company or any Subsidiary merges has shares available under apre-existing plan previously approved by shareholders and not adopted in contemplation of such acquisition or merger, the shares available for grant pursuant to the terms of such plan (as adjusted, to the extent appropriate, to reflect such acquisition or merger) may be used for awards made after such acquisition or merger under this Plan;provided,however, that awards using such available shares may not be made after the date awards or grants could have been made under the terms of thepre-existing plan absent the acquisition or merger, and may only be made to individuals who were not employees or directors of the Company or any Subsidiary prior to such acquisition or merger.

(c)         Any Common Shares that are issued or transferred by, or that are subject to any awards that are granted by, or become obligations of, the Company underSections 23(a) or 23(b) of this Plan will not reduce the Common Shares available for issuance or transfer under this Plan or otherwise count against the limits contained inSection 3 of this Plan. In addition, no Common Shares subject to an award that is granted by, or becomes an obligation of, the Company underSections 23(a) or23(b) of this Plan, will be added to the aggregate limit contained inSection 3(a) of this Plan.


  

 

 

        LOGOLOGO

 

c/o Corporate Election Services

P. O. Box 3230

Pittsburgh, PA 15230

 VOTE  BY  TELEPHONE
 

 

 

 

Have your proxy card available when you call theToll-Free number 1-888-693-8683using a touch-tone phone, and follow the simple instructions to record your vote.

 

 

 

 VOTEBY  INTERNET
 

 

  

 

Have your proxy card available when you access the websitewww.cesvote.comand follow the simple instructions to record your vote.

 

  

 

  VOTEBY  MAIL
  

 

  

 

Please mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in thepostage-paid envelopeprovided or return it to: Corporate Election Services, P.O. Box 3230, Pittsburgh, PA 15230.

 

 

Vote by Telephone

CallToll-Freeusing a  

Touch-Tone phone:  

1-888-693-8683Internet

 

 

  

 

Vote by Internet

Access the Website and

Cast your vote:

www.cesvote.comQR Code

 

 

  

 

Telephone

Vote by

Call Toll-Free:

1-888-693-8683

Mail

Return your proxy card

Access the Internet site andLOGO
cast your vote:card/voting instruction form
www.cesvote.comin thePostage-Paid postage-paid

Scan with a mobile device

envelope provided

 

Vote 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

If you vote by telephone or Internet, please do NOT send your proxy by mail.

 

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO     Proxy must be signed and dated below.

LOGO     Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing.    LOGOLOGO

 

 

THETIMKENCOMPANY

  PROXY /VOTINGINSTRUCTIONCARD

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

The undersigned appoints John M. Timken, Jr.; Richard G. Kyle; and Hansal N. Patel; and each of them, as true and lawful proxies, with full power of substitution, to vote and act for the undersigned as specified on the reverse hereof at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of THE TIMKEN COMPANY to be held online at 4500 Mount Pleasant Street NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720,http://www.cesonlineservices.com/tkr22_vm, on May 10, 2019,6, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., and at any adjournment thereof, as fully as the undersigned could vote and act if personally present on the matters set forth on the reverse hereof, and, in their discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting, and/or if the undersigned is a participant in one or more of the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ employee share ownership plans and has stock of the Company allocated to his or her account(s), the undersigned directs the trustee(s) of such plan(s) likewise to appoint the above-named individuals as proxies to vote and act with respect to all shares of such stock so allocated on the record date for such meeting in the manner specified on the reverse hereof at such meeting or any adjournment thereof, and in their discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting.

 

Signature

 

Signature (if jointly held)
Date:

Please sign exactly as the name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as an attorney, executor, administrator, trust or guardian, please give full title as such.

PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN AS SOON AS POSSIBLE


LOGOLOGO

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

May 6, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

May 10, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.

The Timken Company

4500 Mount Pleasant Street NW

North Canton, OH 44720-5450

Telephone:  (234) 262-3000

Parking:    Shareholders attending the meeting may park in the visitor lot in front of the Corporate Office building.

Note:   If your shares are held in street name, please bring a letter with you from your broker stating as such to the Annual Meeting.

For directions to the Annual Meeting, you may call234-262-3000.http://www.cesonlineservices.com/tkr22_vm

ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO FUTURE DOCUMENTS NOW AVAILABLE

If you are a registered holder of shares, you have the option to access future shareholder communications (e.g., annual reports, proxy statements, related proxy materials) over the Internet instead of receiving those documents in print. Participation is completely voluntary. If you give your consent, in the future, when our material is available over the Internet you will receive notification that will contain the Internet location where the material is available. Our material will be presented in PDF format. There is no cost to you for this service other than any charges you may incur from your Internet provider, telephone and/or cable company. Once you give your consent, it will remain in effect until you inform us otherwise. You may revoke your consent at any time by notifying the Company in writing.

To give your consent, follow the prompts when you vote by telephone or over the Internet or check the appropriate box located at the bottom of the attached proxy card when you vote by mail.

LOGOLOGO     Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing.    LOGOLOGO

 

 

THE TIMKEN COMPANY

  PROXY /VOTINGINSTRUCTIONCARD

PROXY / VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD

The shares represented by this proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors unless otherwise specified. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR proposals 1, 2 and 3.

 

    1.

Election of twelve Directors to serve for a term of one year:

          Nominees:  (01) Maria A. Crowe  (02) Elizabeth A. Harrell  (03) Richard G. Kyle  (04) Sarah C. Lauber
  (05) John A. Luke, Jr.  (06) Christopher L. Mapes  (07) James F. Palmer  (08) Ajita G. Rajendra
  (09) Frank C. Sullivan  (10) John M. Timken, Jr.  (11) Ward J. Timken, Jr.  (12) Jacqueline F. Woods

The shares represented by this proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors unless otherwise specified.

The Board of Directors recommends a

FOR all nominees listed aboveWITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote FOR proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4.

for all nominees listed above

 

1.

Election of Directors to serve for a term of one year:

Nominees:

      (01)  Maria A. Crowe (02) Elizabeth A. Harrell (03)  Richard G. Kyle  (04)  John A. Luke, Jr.
  

    (05)

  Christopher L. Mapes (06) James F. Palmer (07)  Ajita G. Rajendra  (08)  Frank C. Sullivan
  

    (09)

  John M. Timken, Jr. (10) Ward J. Timken, Jr. (11)  Jacqueline F. Woods    
      ❑ FOR all nominees listed above                 WITHHOLD AUTHORITYto vote for all nominees listed above
  

To withhold authority to vote for individual Nominee(s), write the name(s) or number(s) on the line below:

  

  To withhold authority to vote for individual Nominee(s), write the name(s) or number(s) on the line below:

2.

Approval, on an advisory basis, of our named executive officer compensation.

    FOR    FOR  AGAINST    ABSTAIN  

 

3.

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019.2022.

    FOR    FOR  AGAINST    ABSTAIN  

    The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST proposal 4.

    4.

Consideration of a shareholder proposal requesting that our Board take each step necessary so that each voting requirement in our charter and bylaws (that is explicit or implicit due to default to state law) that calls for a greater than simple majority vote be eliminated, and replaced by a requirement for a majority of the votes cast for and against applicable proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws.

 

4.

Approval of The Timken Company 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan.

    FOR    FOR  AGAINST    ABSTAIN  

The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST proposal 5.

 

5.

A shareholder proposal asking our Board of Directors to adopt a policy, or otherwise take the steps necessary, to require that the Chair of the Board of Directors be independent.

      FOR

AGAINSTABSTAIN

PLEASE CHECK THIS BOX IF YOU CONSENT TO ACCESS FUTURE ANNUAL REPORTS AND PROXY MATERIAL VIA THE INTERNET ONLY.

CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.